03.07.2013 Views

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

struggle between two powers is reflected as a war of religion; its social, cultural, and<br />

economic bases are completely ignored or not noticed by contemporary authors. 48<br />

Consequently, on the one hand, this feature makes Selim-nāmes ‘unreliable’ from<br />

the religious stand, socio-political incentives, sources of motivation in their protest<br />

against the Ottoman rule, and the true sentiments of the qizilbashes. Yet, on the other<br />

hand, it is exactly this feature that makes them extremely valuable as a source for<br />

understanding the proliferating ‘Ottoman official ideology’, which had one of the most<br />

effective roles in the making of the ‘Qizilbash Identity”.<br />

Among a number of Selim-nāmes, some deserve special mention for the purpose<br />

of the present study. Before all, Defter VIII, the Addendum of Defter VIII, and Defter IX<br />

of Kemalpaşazāde 49 must be delineated. Before discussing his works, it should be stated<br />

that Kemalpaşazāde’s own career, which started as a müderris in small-scale medreses<br />

and ended in the highest office of the scholarly-bureaucratic hierarchy – that is<br />

şeyhülislamlık – of the Ottoman Empire, 50 makes his narratives of special interest.<br />

Indeed, Kemalpaşazāde was among prominent actors creating or re-shaping the<br />

‘Ottoman official ideology’ against the qizilbash menace and thus formulating the<br />

‘Qizilbash heresy’ as well. Therefore his writings, to a great extent, reflect the Ottoman<br />

official stand. On the other hand, as he was an active figure taking part in most of the<br />

contemporary events, his accounts are based either on his own eye-witness or on a report<br />

48 See J. R. Walsh, “The Historiography of Ottoman-Safavid Relations in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth<br />

Centuries”, in Historians of the Midle East, eds., Bernard Lewis and P. M. Holt, New York, Toronto,<br />

London: Oxford <strong>University</strong> Press, 1962, 197-210.<br />

49 Defter VIII, which deals with the reign of Bayezid II, can not be deemed a selim-nāme. The other two<br />

defters, however, must be considered among outstanding examples of the selim-nāme literature.<br />

50 For the life and works of Şemseddin Ahmed bin Süleyman bin Kemal Paşa (Kemalpaşazāde), see Mecdī<br />

Mehmed Efendi, Şakaik-ı Nu’maniye ve Zeylleri, c. I, haz. Abdülkadir Özcan, Đstanbul: Çağrı Yayınları,<br />

1989, pp. 381-385; ALI, pp. 1209-1216; Franz Babinger, “Kemālpashazāde”, EI2, p. 912; Đsmet<br />

Parmaksızoğlu, “Kemāl Paşa Zāde”, IA, p. 561; Hayri Bolay, Bahaeddin Yediyıldız, Mustafa Sait<br />

Yazıcıoğlu, eds., Şeyhülislâm Đbn Kemâl Sempozyumu, Ankara: Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı Yayınları, 1989.<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!