03.07.2013 Views

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

egarding the ‘deep current’ and which for the most part focused on the anthropological<br />

fundamentals of the political formations, governed the whole thesis.<br />

It is only by now, having determined the ‘visible picture’ as far as the available<br />

sources allow, that the fundamentals of the Qizilbash Identity which are rooted in the<br />

‘deep current’, especially its religious and anthropological fundamentals, could be<br />

speculated on a comparatively safe ground of historical knowledge. Yet it should be<br />

stated that the present monograph of the emergence of the Qizilbash Identity will remain<br />

incomplete until a comprehensive evaluation of the religious and anthropological<br />

dimensions of this identity is carried out. We have copies of the religious-sacred texts of<br />

the qizilbashes, namely Buyruk, dating from the early seventeenth century. The Buyruk<br />

texts not only explain the pillars of the qizilbash belief and rules of the practice or<br />

rituals, but also include valuable information on the social organization, the socio-<br />

religious hierarchy, and the religious-legal principles governing the community. Once<br />

the course of the events was established, which was what the present thesis attempted to<br />

do, then the accounts of Buyruk texts became meaningful and gain historical value even<br />

if the earliest text was from after a century later than the congealment of the Qizilbash<br />

Identity. 2041 As a matter of fact, a sufficient study of the religious aspects of the<br />

Qizilbash Identity, which is mainly based on the Buyruk texts and which consults with<br />

some archival documents – especially the Mühimme registers of the Ottoman state - and<br />

with the other known sources, would complete the present monograph.<br />

As well as the ‘surface current’ is concerned, the attentive reader might have<br />

already recognized that ‘the making of the Qizilbash Identity’ was a phenomenon<br />

2041 The earliest known manuscript of Buyruk texts was copied in 1612-3 in Manisa. The transliterated text<br />

of this copy, alongside with the facsimile of the original manuscript, is published by Ahmet Taşğın. See<br />

Bisâtî, Şeyh Sâfî Buyruğu (Menâkıbu’l-Esrâr Behcetü’l-Ahrâr), ed. Ahmet Taşğın, Ankara, 2003.<br />

625

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!