03.07.2013 Views

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

We learn from Kemalpaşazāde, 1186 when Ismail rose in 1499, the Turkomans of<br />

Teke were among his foremost supporters. Kemalpaşazāde’s description - such as<br />

disobedient-stubborn, fearless, and killers - suggests that they were overwhelmingly<br />

nomadic-tribes. We also learn from Kemalpaşazāde that they were not deemed as being<br />

respected (kendüye kimse ādem demeyen), but rather esteemed among lower classes of<br />

the society in their homeland. They were far away from state posts, but always had been<br />

simple subjects. In short, they were distanced from the Ottoman state organization in<br />

such a degree that they could not benefit from any favor of the state; rather regarded by<br />

the bureaucrats - the state agents – as second class subjects.<br />

On the other hand, they found, as Kemalpaşazāde put forward, honor and respect<br />

in the court of Ismail. They became attached to the dignity of state and achieved high<br />

posts near Ismail while they were ignorable subjects in their homeland. Those who had<br />

never been acquainted with any state functionary in their life became the commanders<br />

and generals. Kemalpaşazāde also hits on an important point to be underscored: the<br />

Turkomans of Teke were among the firsts who joined Ismail’s forces when he moved<br />

from Gīlan. Thus they acquired superiority among qizilbashes. They also acquired fame<br />

with their bravery and obedience (merdānelik ve yoldaşlık). 1187<br />

Kemalpaşazāde argues it was because of the respect and opportunities they found<br />

under the banner of Ismail which caused many Turkomans of the Teke region to leave<br />

their home and immigrate to Persia. They sold all of their possessions even at very low<br />

prices. One should not disregard, however, that this is not the whole picture; it was not<br />

çift āstini iki yini yaka rūstāyi bölüşmek, ya’nī ki iki çahşırı bir uğurdan temellüke kādir olmayanları birisi<br />

ile iktifā itmek ve beğleri ve bellü başluların ekseri ol tarīka gitmek şi’ār u disārları Đslām ve imanları gibi<br />

şatr-ı vāhid ile kanā’at sūretini göstermek üzre idi.” (ALI, p. 1086.)<br />

1186 KPZ8b, p. 43.<br />

1187 KPZ8b, p. 43.<br />

359

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!