03.07.2013 Views

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Kemalpaşazāde reports that some of rebels were killed and some others were<br />

deported in order to re-establish tranquility. But he does not clarify where these<br />

rebellious qizilbashes were exiled to. Later historians, however, specifies this point.<br />

Hoca Saadeddin, for example, explains how the number of Ismail’s sympathizers in<br />

Anatolia, especially in Teke and Hamid-ili, had increased when Ismail rose up, captured<br />

Tabriz and consolidated his temporal power as well as his spiritual one. As already<br />

mentioned in the previous pages, the majority of his fighters were recruited from several<br />

region of Anatolia and the Ottoman Provinces of Teke and Hamid-ili were among the<br />

foremost regions where qizilbash activities were intensified. 1037 Ottoman administration<br />

tried to prevent qizilbash’s passing over the borders. 1038 Nevertheless, the danger was<br />

not limited to some subjects’ abandoning their home lands, but, according to Ottoman<br />

sources, the remaining qizilbashes were also disturbing the social order. 1039 The final<br />

solution, then, came out as a quite severe one. The famous qizilbashes of the region were<br />

exiled to the recently captured coastal cities of Morea, Modon, Coron, and Lepanto. 1040<br />

Before Hoca Saadeddin, however, this deportation was reported by<br />

Aşıkpaşazāde, who was already an old man then. As indicated earlier, the last section<br />

(bāb) of his history is directly connected to the deportation of Safavid disciples from<br />

Anatolia to Moton and Koron. The subtitle and introductory sentences of this section<br />

1037 HSE3, p. 345.<br />

1038 See, for example, ANMH, p. 45.<br />

1039 KPZ8a, p. 233-4. Seventeenth century historians, such as Müneccimbaşı and Solakzāde, usually recite<br />

Saadeddin’s account on this issue. Among them Müneccimbaşı explicitly states the risk of anarchy that the<br />

remaining sufis could possibly create as a reason of the deportation. “Teke ve Hamid Đli’nde bulunan<br />

Türkmenlerden çoğu Şah Đsmail’in ordusuna katıldıklarından kalanların bir fitne çıkarmasından korkuldu.<br />

Bunlar Sultan’ın emriyle Modon ve Koron bölgesinde iskān edildiler. Serhad muhafızlarına da bunlardan<br />

memleketlerine dönmek isteyenlere mani olmaları emr edildi.” See MNB, p. 417.<br />

1040 HSE3, pp. 345-6. Solakzāde repeats Saadeddin’s account. See SLZ1, p. 429. Consider also TNSB, pp.<br />

237-8 and HAM2, p. 369. The deportation of qizilbashes is recorded in contemporary Italian sources as<br />

well. See FSH, p. 92.<br />

318

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!