03.07.2013 Views

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

community within the Ottoman Empire significantly shifted from tribal-nomads to<br />

sedentary villagers.<br />

Nevertheless, although being the overwhelming color, this is not the whole<br />

picture. It would not be true to argue that the dissemination of the qizilbash message<br />

among sedentary people was a phenomenon of the post-Çaldıran period. Contemporary<br />

sources make frequent references to villagers and townspeople somehow adhered to the<br />

qizilbash movement at least by the year 1510 and onwards especially in the province of<br />

Rum, in the context of the intense qizilbash uprisings. Even some discontent Ottoman<br />

officials such as the timar holders and qādis supported these uprisings. 2011 Especially in<br />

the Province of Rum, the number of non-tribal ‘qizilbashes’ increased dramatically. One<br />

may assure two possible reasons for this: first of all, in the first decade of the sixteenth<br />

century, the Province of Rum was ruled, nearly independently, by Prince Ahmed, whose<br />

vague policy regarding to the qizilbash issue is already delineated.<br />

The analysis in chapter VI showed that one should not totally ignore the claim<br />

put forward by the Ottoman historians that Ahmed established good relations with the<br />

qizilbashes simply to gain their military support in his struggle with Prince Selim. On<br />

the other hand, it seems that the official interest in the military potency of the qizilbashes<br />

somehow facilitated the legitimacy of qizilbashism within the public sphere. 2012<br />

2011 A detailed analysis of the role of timar holders in the Shahkulu rebellion and their incentives is already<br />

made in chapter VI. There are some occasional indications in the contemporary sources to the ‘somehow’<br />

affiliation of state officials to the qizilbash movement. The qādi of Bolu, for example, lost his life because<br />

of his connection with the Safavids. As recited by Haydar Çelebi in Feridun Beg’s Munşe’āt<br />

(Münşe’ātü’s-selātin, I, Istanbul, 1274/1858, p. 497): “…Yiğirminci günde (20 Rebī II, 924/May 1, 1518)<br />

Bolu kadısı Mevlāna Đsa’nun Erdebil cānibiyle mu’āmelesi olmağın salb olunmak emr olunub Hüseyn ve<br />

Đskender nām kapucular gönderildi. Anlar dahī mezkūrı Merzifon’da bulub ‘ale-mele’i’n-nās salb<br />

eylediler.” Cited and quoted in Jean-Louis Bacqué-Grammont, “Etudes Turco-Safavides, III. Notes et<br />

documents sur la revolte de Sah Veli b. Seyh Celal”, Archivum Ottomanicum, VII, 1982, p. 24.<br />

2012 For an exaggerated account of how qizilbashism attained popularity and ‘official’ acceptance in the<br />

Province of Rum under Prince Ahmed, see Amasyalı Abdizāde Hüseyin Hüsāmeddin, Amasya Tarihi, vol.<br />

III, Đstanbul, 1927, pp. 240-272.<br />

610

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!