Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX
Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX
Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Nitrate Vulnerable Zones (NVZs)<br />
In Scotland, 14% of the land area is designated <strong>as</strong> NVZs. These are located in<br />
Aberdeenshire, Moray, Banff and Buchan; Strathmore and Fife; Lothians and the<br />
Borders; and Lower Nithsdale. The European Nitrates Directive 91/676/EEC requires<br />
legally binding rules to be put in place for NVZs to reduce nitrate loss from agricultural<br />
land when nitrate levels exceed, or are likely to exceed, the levels set in the Directive.<br />
These rules are known <strong>as</strong> Action Programmes. Action Programme me<strong>as</strong>ures in NVZs<br />
in Scotland require that a fertiliser and manure plan to <strong>as</strong>sess N fertiliser requirement<br />
for each crop and field is prepared and implemented; N must not be applied in excess<br />
of crop need; organic manure applications must not exceed specified N limits; and<br />
closed periods when slurry and poultry manure shall not be applied to any land<br />
that h<strong>as</strong> a sandy or shallow soil (Scottish Executive, 2003). SAC estimated in the<br />
Regulatory Impact Assessment that these me<strong>as</strong>ures could reduce nitrate leaching in<br />
the NVZs by up to 3,580 tonnes N/annum (Oglethorpe et al., 2002).<br />
The Nitrates Directive requires the Action Programme to be reviewed periodically.<br />
Ahead of the next review (2006), the European Commission h<strong>as</strong> challenged the UK’s<br />
implementation of the Nitrates Directive. The Commission h<strong>as</strong> identified several<br />
<strong>as</strong>pects of the existing Action Programme that it wishes the UK to address. The<br />
major issues affect livestock farms, and relate to the farm-b<strong>as</strong>ed limit on livestock<br />
excretal returns; and the extension of the closed period for spreading slurry and<br />
poultry manure with <strong>as</strong>sociated requirement for incre<strong>as</strong>ed storage. The Commission<br />
h<strong>as</strong> also identified the need to be sure what the upper N fertiliser limits are and there<br />
needs to be some maximum. The Scottish Executive is preparing a consultation<br />
paper, expected in February 2006, proposing changes to the 2003 NVZ Action<br />
Programme Regulations. Recent changes in economics including CAP reform have<br />
already introduced changes to agricultural practice that on balance are expected to<br />
reduce nitrate leaching independently of the provisions of the Action Programme. The<br />
expected incre<strong>as</strong>e in conversion of arable land to extensively-managed, permanent<br />
green cover; and the reductions in economic optimum N fertiliser requirement due to<br />
higher N fertiliser costs and continuing low commodity price will also contribute.<br />
Designated Bathing Waters<br />
Faecal coliforms and faecal Streptococci from agriculture contribute too many of the<br />
60 designated bathing waters in Scotland failing the EC Bathing Water standards,<br />
especially in the South West of the country (Ayrshire, Dumfries and Galloway).<br />
Merrilees et al. (2004) and Aitken et al. (2004) reported on a SEERAD-funded project<br />
to deliver capital works me<strong>as</strong>ures and farm-specific BMPs to reduce the potential risk<br />
of faecal indicator organism (FIO) contamination from livestock farms to rivers. Fortyeight<br />
farms were surveyed in four sensitive river catchments draining into bathing<br />
waters in the south, west and north co<strong>as</strong>t of Scotland. FIO bacteria from farmland<br />
potentially impacted all the rivers. W<strong>as</strong>te storage facilities, farming practices, field<br />
conditions, grazing management and risks of FIO contamination to watercourses<br />
were <strong>as</strong>sessed on each farm and BMPs were designed, costed, implemented and<br />
monitored. With only nine farms, Brighouse Bay w<strong>as</strong> an ideal place to establish and<br />
monitor BMPs and <strong>as</strong>sess any improvement in water quality. The main aim w<strong>as</strong><br />
to determine to what extent improved farm practices and BMPs could contribute<br />
to improved water quality in the catchment (Dickson et al., 2005; Merrilees et al.,<br />
2006).<br />
103