22.01.2014 Views

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CAN WE IMPROVE PREDICTION OF P CONCENTRATION<br />

IN LUNAN LOCHS BY CHANGING THE PLUS MODEL?<br />

I Papadopoulou 1 , A Vinten 2 and J DeGroote 2<br />

1<br />

Miaouli 24, Kordelio 56334, Thessaloniki, Greece, E-mail: ioanna.papadopoulou@<br />

gmail.com; 2 The Macaulay Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen, AB15 8QH, UK<br />

SUMMARY<br />

This project involves changing different factors of the PLUS model in order to test<br />

how sensitive the model is to these parameters. The first factor examined w<strong>as</strong><br />

whether modifying export coefficients to better reflect land use (spring–winter cereals)<br />

improved prediction of P loading. After checking the impact of crop choice, another<br />

scenario w<strong>as</strong> set aimed at investigating how sensitive the model is to changes in<br />

the P export coefficient table used in previous PLUS application. In addition, an<br />

attempt w<strong>as</strong> made to represent structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) in the<br />

GIS framework and predict potential reduction in phosphorus in-loch concentrations<br />

resulting from installing buffer strips.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

PLUS is a manageable model, constructed to predict the loss of phosphorus from<br />

a complex catchment to its drainage system. The model uses an export coefficient<br />

approach, calculating the total phosphorus (TP) load delivered annually to a water<br />

body <strong>as</strong> the sum of the individual loads exported from each nutrient source in its<br />

catchment.<br />

The catchment of the Lunan Burn, in Scotland, w<strong>as</strong> selected <strong>as</strong> the study site for the<br />

present project. The Lunan chain of Lochs in Perthshire is of high conservation status<br />

and requires informed and targeted environmental protection.<br />

A study comparing predictions of PLUS with monthly observations of P status<br />

of the Lunan chain of Lochs (SEPA, 2004) found a marked discrepancy between<br />

observations and predictions. This discrepancy could be attributed to a number of<br />

factors, but the most likely issues identified were the inadequacy of the land cover<br />

data, the use of inappropriate loss coefficients and imperfect knowledge of septic<br />

tank outputs.<br />

Comparison of the resulting predictions for in-loch concentrations of TP with<br />

observed values for the lochs showed re<strong>as</strong>onably good agreement for the upper<br />

three lochs in the Lunan chain. However, for Lochs Clunie and Marlee the predictions<br />

of the model were significantly higher than the observed values (SEPA, 2004).<br />

SCENARIOS APPLIED<br />

Two scenarios were applied to Lunan catchment, with the aim of determining which<br />

of the model parameters exert greatest influence over model output. For the purpose<br />

of these scenarios, the year of 1999 w<strong>as</strong> chosen <strong>as</strong> the control year. This decision<br />

w<strong>as</strong> taken because among the sets of years for which data are available, 1999 w<strong>as</strong><br />

closer to the initial PLUS application during which water chemistry data from January<br />

2000 w<strong>as</strong> used.<br />

231

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!