22.01.2014 Views

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

High Flows<br />

Under high flow conditions, faecal indicator concentrations exhibit a strong se<strong>as</strong>onal<br />

pattern with much higher levels in the summer period. In the unmodified ‘control’<br />

catchment, the incre<strong>as</strong>e in mean bathing water compliance parameters between the<br />

pre- ‘autumn/winter’ and the post- ‘summer’ sampling periods were <strong>as</strong> follows:<br />

a. total coliform 10.6 -fold incre<strong>as</strong>e<br />

b. Escherichia coli 6.8-fold incre<strong>as</strong>e<br />

c. Intestinal enterocci 3.5-fold incre<strong>as</strong>e.<br />

Commonly, over 95% of the faecal indicator flux in the bathing se<strong>as</strong>on occurs during<br />

storm periods, thus, the elevation in concentration in high flows is very significant.<br />

Analysis<br />

This observed se<strong>as</strong>onality made direct comparison of the high flow water quality data<br />

acquired pre- and post-remediation meaningless. However, the control catchment<br />

facilitated comparisons between the pre-remediation difference between ‘test’<br />

and ‘control’ catchments (a) and the post-remediation difference (b). The value (b)<br />

minus (a) gives the magnitude of water quality improvement in the post-remediation<br />

period.<br />

Two me<strong>as</strong>ures of subcatchment remediation intensity were calculated:<br />

i. the additional percentage of the stream bank length fenced and,<br />

ii. the additional percentage of subcatchment land area from which the stream w<strong>as</strong><br />

‘protected’, by the new fencing.<br />

While this inferred relationship will always be ‘confounded’ by subcatchment factors<br />

such <strong>as</strong>, (a) the exact positioning of the fencing in relation to the sampling point<br />

and (b) locations of hardstandings and their ‘connectivity’ within the subcatchment,<br />

there does seem to be a clear improvement in the catchments where a significant<br />

proportion of the stream bank h<strong>as</strong> been fenced.<br />

133

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!