22.01.2014 Views

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In 2003/04, heavy rain fell after the late-drilled treatments were established, again<br />

causing capping of the soil surface on the sandy soil at Pewsey with rill erosion down<br />

the tramlines. This rain also caused gushing of run-off down the tramlines on some<br />

traps on the L-RC treatment at Wilton, and incre<strong>as</strong>ed run-off from the headland area<br />

at E<strong>as</strong>t Knoyle (Table 1). Consequently, run-off volumes were up to c. fivefold greater<br />

on the late-drilled treatments than on the early-drilled treatments. As in the first year,<br />

the incre<strong>as</strong>ed run-off mobilised significantly more sediment and P on the ploughed<br />

soil compared with the reduced cultivated soil at Pewsey (Table 1). At Wilton, flowweighted<br />

SS and TP concentrations were incre<strong>as</strong>ed on the L-RC treatment but not<br />

significantly so. However at E<strong>as</strong>t Knoyle, flow-weighted SS and P concentrations<br />

were significantly lower in the run-off on the headland area, perhaps reflecting a more<br />

consolidated surface that w<strong>as</strong> more resistant to sediment entrainment. Sufficient<br />

crop cover had developed on the early drilled treatments at all sites in 2003/04 to<br />

prevent accelerated sediment and P mobilisation, and there were no significant soil<br />

cultivation treatment effects. Mean cumulative sediment and TP export ranged up<br />

to 0.8 t/ha and 0.6 kg/ha in 2003/04, with the majority (60-97%) of the TP export in<br />

particulate (> 0.45 mm) form at all three sites (Table 1).<br />

Table 1:<br />

Treatment effects on cumulative run-off volume, and loads of SS, TP<br />

and DP at each site in 2003/04. Flow-weighted concentrations (g/L<br />

for SS and mg/L for TP and DP) are given in brackets<br />

Site Run-off SS TP DP<br />

Treatment (mm) (kg/ha) (g/ha) (g/ha)<br />

Pewsey<br />

E-TC 3.2 77 (2.3) 48 (1.5) 3 (0.08)<br />

E-RC 3.2 57 (1.8) 38 (1.1) 4 (0.12)<br />

L-TC 15.8 650 (4.3) 548 (3.6) 31 (0.18)<br />

L-RC 14.1 184 (1.3) 183 (1.3) 23 (0.16)<br />

Significance *** *** *** **<br />

l.s.d. 129 107 17<br />

E<strong>as</strong>t Knoyle<br />

E-TC 1.5 49 (3.2) 47 (3.0) 5 (0.32)<br />

E-RC 2.5 75 (3.3) 72 (3.2) 9 (0.39)<br />

Headland 9.7 70 (0.7) 148 (1.4) 19 (0.22)<br />

L-RC 1.8 32 (1.7) 30 (1.6) 5 (0.28)<br />

Significance NS NS *<br />

l.s.d. 9<br />

Wilton<br />

E-TC 2.0 63 (2.8) 51 (2.3) 3 (0.12)<br />

E-RC 2.4 43 (1. 8) 39 (1.6) 2 (0.07)<br />

L-TC 5.0 150 (3.0) 97 (2.0) 12 (0.06)<br />

L-RC 13.2 787 (4.6) 583 (3.4) 3 (0.10)<br />

Significance NS NS NS NS<br />

*, ** and *** denotes significance at the 5%, 1% and 0.1% level, respectively. NS, not<br />

significant; l.s.d., le<strong>as</strong>t significant difference.<br />

275

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!