Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX
Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX
Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
• Treatment of manures and slurries to remove P and N.<br />
• The transfer of treated manures out of the region.<br />
The requirement to treat depends on the size of the herd on farm and the extent of<br />
the manure N overloading in the canton. The largest pig producers (e.g. producing<br />
> 25,000 kg manure N) in sensitive cantons are obliged to both separate slurries for<br />
P removal (80% of the manure P must be removed) and treat the liquid to reduce the<br />
amount of N in the resulting effluent. However, the livestock threshold for mandatory<br />
treatment varies according to the overall manure N loading within each ZES.<br />
Many of the treatment technologies are costly to set up and operate, and so funding<br />
h<strong>as</strong> been made available to help with investment (Le Louarn, personal communication).<br />
For example, in the Department of Côte d’Armor the following funding is available:<br />
• The Agence de l’Eau (Water Agency) provides up to 30% of the investment<br />
cost.<br />
• The General Council (Departmental level) will provide up to 15% of investment<br />
costs for farm holdings producing 20,000 kg/a of manure N or less, a maximum<br />
of 110,000 euros per holding.<br />
• The Regional Council of Brittany also provides up to 15% of investment costs<br />
for farm holdings producing 20,000 kg/year of manure N or less, but up to a<br />
maximum of 140,000 euros per holding<br />
It is therefore possible for up to 60% of the treatment costs to be paid by regional<br />
funding. However in reality, only those farm holdings that have met the IPCE and<br />
PMPOA (Programme de Maîtrise des Pollutions d’origine Agricole) regulations since<br />
1994 are eligible. In the majority of c<strong>as</strong>es, the level of funding obtained per holding<br />
ranges from 0% to 30% (Le Bris, personal communication).<br />
Farms that are obliged to take action can obtain advice from the General Council,<br />
the Chamber of Agriculture and the various companies that market treatment<br />
technologies. Where treatment is an economically viable option, farms can group<br />
together to form a GIE (Groupement d’Intérêt Economique). However, the majority<br />
(88%) of treatment plants are operated by individual farms (Le Bris et al., 2005). On<br />
those farms for whom the treatment option is not economic, the only alternatives<br />
are to:<br />
• transfer w<strong>as</strong>tes to cantons where the manure N loading is less than 140 kg/ha;<br />
• reduce the amount of N produced by introducing bi-ph<strong>as</strong>e or multi-ph<strong>as</strong>e<br />
feeding;<br />
• incinerate the w<strong>as</strong>te (fe<strong>as</strong>ible for poultry) with transfer of <strong>as</strong>h products; and<br />
• reduce the number of livestock.<br />
189