22.01.2014 Views

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE USE OF FISH TO DETERMINE IMPACTS OF<br />

DIFFUSE POLLUTION ON RIVERS AND HUMAN HEALTH<br />

RGM Heath, HH du Preez and B Genthe<br />

Pulles Howard & de Lange Inc, P. O. Box 861, Auckland Park, Johannesburg, South<br />

Africa, E-mail: ralphh@phd.co.za<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Modern agriculture, industrialization and urbanization have negatively affected<br />

environmental quality and specifically aquatic systems (Förstner and Wittmann,<br />

1983). In South Africa, the pollution of freshwater aquatic systems can be linked to<br />

point source discharges (w<strong>as</strong>te water treatment works and industrial effluents) and<br />

diffuse surface run-off (agricultural, mining, informal settlements and urban). As a<br />

result of these anthropogenic activities, innocent people <strong>as</strong> well <strong>as</strong> other life forms<br />

may be exposed to harmful contaminants that may be rele<strong>as</strong>ed without adequate<br />

consideration of human health and the environmental effects (Tchounwou et al.,<br />

1996).<br />

Effects on human health <strong>as</strong> a result of exposure to surface water contaminants<br />

can occur through contact recreation, drinking water and the consumption of<br />

contaminated food for example, fish and shellfish (USEPA, 1991). People consuming<br />

fish or shellfish are potentially at risk <strong>as</strong> these organisms have the potential to<br />

bioaccumulate harmful contaminants from the aquatic environment (USEPA, 1991;<br />

Bevelhimer, 1995). The contaminants that have been bioaccumulated by the fish<br />

or shellfish pose carcinogenic, genotoxic and non-carcinogenic health risks to<br />

consumers (Reinert et al., 1991; USEPA, 1991). It must be stressed, however, that the<br />

consumption of fish is generally beneficial <strong>as</strong> it provides a good source of protein,<br />

vitamins, omega fatty acids and b<strong>as</strong>ic minerals (USEPA, 1997), <strong>as</strong> well <strong>as</strong> many<br />

others benefits. It is evident that the consumption of fish is beneficial to humans, but<br />

if these fish are contaminated they pose a health risk to consumers.<br />

As a result of the potential health risk <strong>as</strong>sociated with the consumption of chemically<br />

contaminated non-commercially caught fish, the United States of America h<strong>as</strong> been<br />

issuing fish consumption advisories and bans that are designed to reduce the risk to<br />

fish consumers (USEPA, 1995a, 1999).<br />

The results of metal surveys in South Africa linking human health and consumption<br />

of fish have indicated that in highly industrialised catchments and those with mining<br />

activities (mainly gold and coal), that the metals in the fish tissues are at levels that<br />

could cause human health risks under different exposure scenarios (Heath, 1999;<br />

Heath et al., 2004a,b). Similarly studies undertaken on biocides from diffuse pollution<br />

sources such <strong>as</strong> intensive agriculture, forestry and where malaria control is practiced<br />

have indicated that the levels of pesticides recorded in the fish could possible cause<br />

human health risks under different exposure scenarios (Bouwman et al., 1990; Heath,<br />

1999; Heath and Cla<strong>as</strong>sen, 1999).<br />

From the preceding it is evident that possible human health risks due to the<br />

consumption of contaminated fish from South African freshwater systems have<br />

received little attention. This is an unacceptable situation <strong>as</strong> pollutants from various<br />

153

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!