22.01.2014 Views

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 2: Time series of total daily phosphorus loads at Coull Bridge during<br />

the period of monitoring and the TMDL for TP b<strong>as</strong>ed on a target<br />

concentration value of 0.05 mg/L<br />

The major sources of P in the catchment were then identified and their respective<br />

contributions to the actual flux of TP recorded during the period of monitoring<br />

determined using GIS-b<strong>as</strong>ed tools (Ferrier et al., 2004). These tools enable human<br />

population density data from the 2001 census to be used in conjunction with userentered<br />

per-capita rates for specified pollutants to estimate annual pollutant fluxes<br />

from w<strong>as</strong>te water treatment plants (WWTPs) and septic tanks. The estimated annual<br />

P loadings from these sources in the Tarland catchment were adjusted for the length<br />

of the monitoring period and then subtracted from the actual flux of TP recorded<br />

during the period of monitoring to give an estimate of P loading from diffuse sources<br />

(Figure 3). Relationships between loadings of P from major sources in the catchment<br />

and violations of the target concentration value of TP were then examined in order<br />

to determine acceptable load allocations to meet the desired level of water quality.<br />

Analysis of the field data revealed that the export of P during the period of monitoring<br />

w<strong>as</strong> positively correlated with discharge (r = 0.47, P =

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!