22.01.2014 Views

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

On the b<strong>as</strong>is of discussions with the land mangers and other stakeholders it w<strong>as</strong><br />

agreed that that any interventions to improve water quality should be undertaken<br />

in a systematic b<strong>as</strong>is by concentrating efforts on individual tributaries. In the light<br />

of this and the data presented in Table 1 initial intervention work concentrated on<br />

the tributary represented by site 13. After further investigation of the tributary and<br />

in conjunction with the riparian land managers, three specific intervention me<strong>as</strong>ures<br />

were identified and implemented. These were: (a) the overhaul of the operation of a<br />

septic tank, (b) the installation of buffer strips and water troughs to reduce the need<br />

for cattle using the stream waterings and (c) the establishment of a small wetland<br />

where field drainage collector pipes were known to issue directly to the burn. These<br />

me<strong>as</strong>ures were implemented during the winter and spring of 2002/03. From the<br />

programme of samples taken comparison of the water quality and invertebrates for<br />

the year prior to and after the interventions were made is presented in Table 2. The<br />

data indicate significant reductions in the concentrations of phosphate, ammonia,<br />

nitrate and faecal coliforms. Furthermore a significant incre<strong>as</strong>e is seen in the BMWP<br />

score.<br />

Table 2:<br />

Water quality and invertebrate data prior to and post-intervention<br />

above tributary site 13<br />

Determinand Pre-intervention Post-intervention<br />

PO 4<br />

-P (mg/L) 0.032<br />

(< DL–0.11)<br />

NH 4<br />

-N (mg/L) 0.043<br />

(< DL–0.166)<br />

NO 3<br />

-N (mg/L) 4.96<br />

(3.48–5.89)<br />

Faecal coliforms 252000<br />

(640000–29000)<br />

BMWP 72<br />

(59–89)<br />

Stakeholder Involvement<br />

0.018<br />

(< DL–0.050)<br />

0.015<br />

(< DL–0.052)<br />

4.26<br />

(3.33–4.89)<br />

2080<br />

(320–5000)<br />

90<br />

(74–113)<br />

An important element of establishing, prioritising and agreeing to intervention<br />

works in the Tarland catchment h<strong>as</strong> been to include and involve the catchment<br />

stakeholders. To fulfil this requirement stakeholders have been involved in a number<br />

of ways according to their interest and stake in the catchment. At the b<strong>as</strong>ic level, the<br />

community have been introduced to the issues, need for intervention and concept<br />

of catchment management through a mixture of informal and formal meetings,<br />

presentations, summary information and a web site (www.macaulay.ac.uk/tarland/).<br />

At the next level of engagement an annual seminar and discussion group with the<br />

farmers h<strong>as</strong> taken place. Through this mechanism additional information from p<strong>as</strong>t<br />

experiences in the form of anecdotal evidence h<strong>as</strong> been made available. Furthermore,<br />

the options for possible tributaries have been identified and the mechanisms for<br />

reducing pollution have been discussed together with possible advantages or<br />

constraints on sites have been identified. Finally the principal land managers (the<br />

MacRobert Trust estate manager, Scottish Water) together with Agency and research<br />

staff (SEPA, SNH, Macaulay Institute and Aberdeenshire Council) formed a steering<br />

group. This group h<strong>as</strong> taken the available information and views expressed by the<br />

227

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!