Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX
Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX
Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
On the b<strong>as</strong>is of discussions with the land mangers and other stakeholders it w<strong>as</strong><br />
agreed that that any interventions to improve water quality should be undertaken<br />
in a systematic b<strong>as</strong>is by concentrating efforts on individual tributaries. In the light<br />
of this and the data presented in Table 1 initial intervention work concentrated on<br />
the tributary represented by site 13. After further investigation of the tributary and<br />
in conjunction with the riparian land managers, three specific intervention me<strong>as</strong>ures<br />
were identified and implemented. These were: (a) the overhaul of the operation of a<br />
septic tank, (b) the installation of buffer strips and water troughs to reduce the need<br />
for cattle using the stream waterings and (c) the establishment of a small wetland<br />
where field drainage collector pipes were known to issue directly to the burn. These<br />
me<strong>as</strong>ures were implemented during the winter and spring of 2002/03. From the<br />
programme of samples taken comparison of the water quality and invertebrates for<br />
the year prior to and after the interventions were made is presented in Table 2. The<br />
data indicate significant reductions in the concentrations of phosphate, ammonia,<br />
nitrate and faecal coliforms. Furthermore a significant incre<strong>as</strong>e is seen in the BMWP<br />
score.<br />
Table 2:<br />
Water quality and invertebrate data prior to and post-intervention<br />
above tributary site 13<br />
Determinand Pre-intervention Post-intervention<br />
PO 4<br />
-P (mg/L) 0.032<br />
(< DL–0.11)<br />
NH 4<br />
-N (mg/L) 0.043<br />
(< DL–0.166)<br />
NO 3<br />
-N (mg/L) 4.96<br />
(3.48–5.89)<br />
Faecal coliforms 252000<br />
(640000–29000)<br />
BMWP 72<br />
(59–89)<br />
Stakeholder Involvement<br />
0.018<br />
(< DL–0.050)<br />
0.015<br />
(< DL–0.052)<br />
4.26<br />
(3.33–4.89)<br />
2080<br />
(320–5000)<br />
90<br />
(74–113)<br />
An important element of establishing, prioritising and agreeing to intervention<br />
works in the Tarland catchment h<strong>as</strong> been to include and involve the catchment<br />
stakeholders. To fulfil this requirement stakeholders have been involved in a number<br />
of ways according to their interest and stake in the catchment. At the b<strong>as</strong>ic level, the<br />
community have been introduced to the issues, need for intervention and concept<br />
of catchment management through a mixture of informal and formal meetings,<br />
presentations, summary information and a web site (www.macaulay.ac.uk/tarland/).<br />
At the next level of engagement an annual seminar and discussion group with the<br />
farmers h<strong>as</strong> taken place. Through this mechanism additional information from p<strong>as</strong>t<br />
experiences in the form of anecdotal evidence h<strong>as</strong> been made available. Furthermore,<br />
the options for possible tributaries have been identified and the mechanisms for<br />
reducing pollution have been discussed together with possible advantages or<br />
constraints on sites have been identified. Finally the principal land managers (the<br />
MacRobert Trust estate manager, Scottish Water) together with Agency and research<br />
staff (SEPA, SNH, Macaulay Institute and Aberdeenshire Council) formed a steering<br />
group. This group h<strong>as</strong> taken the available information and views expressed by the<br />
227