22.01.2014 Views

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TACKLING DIFFUSE NITRATE POLLUTION: SWAPPING<br />

EUTROPHICATION FOR CLIMATE CHANGE?<br />

D Reay<br />

University of Edinburgh, School of Geosciences, Crew Building, West Mains Road,<br />

Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, UK, E-mail: david.reay@ed.sac.uk<br />

SUMMARY<br />

Large are<strong>as</strong> of the UK have now been designated ‘Nitrate Vulnerable Zones’ (NVZs)<br />

<strong>as</strong> a result of the high levels of nitrate in surface and groundwaters. Where nitrate<br />

is lost from the fields through drainage there are two main remediation strategies<br />

available. The first involves the creation of strips of uncultivated land, known <strong>as</strong><br />

‘buffer strips’ to intercept the leached nitrate before it gets into drainage waters. The<br />

other is designed to intercept any nitrate already in drainage waters by diverting the<br />

water through natural or constructed denitrifying wetlands.<br />

The use of both buffer strips, often in riparian zones, and denitrifying wetlands, h<strong>as</strong><br />

become incre<strong>as</strong>ingly widespread in the p<strong>as</strong>t few years (Mitch et al., 2001; Sabater et<br />

al., 2003), but doubts remain over their suitability in many are<strong>as</strong> (Dosskey, 2002). As<br />

well <strong>as</strong> the potential problem of leached nitrate by-p<strong>as</strong>sing the buffer strip and wetland<br />

soils, there is also a danger that denitrification in their soils - the primary process of<br />

nitrate removal – will lead to greatly incre<strong>as</strong>ed nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (Hefting<br />

et.al., 2003), so swapping a water pollution problem for a climate change issue (Reay,<br />

2004). Here we present a synthesis of N pollution swapping studies to date and<br />

introduce a wide-ranging project aimed at addressing this key issue.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Mitsch WJ, Day Jr JW, Gilliam JW, Groffman PM, Hey DL, Randall, GW and Wang N<br />

(2001). Reducing nitrogen loading to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River<br />

b<strong>as</strong>in: strategies to counter a persistent ecological problem. BioScience, 51(5), 373-<br />

388.<br />

Sabater S et al. (2003). Nitrogen removal by riparian buffers along a European climatic<br />

gradient: Patterns and factors of variation. Ecosystems, 6(1), 20-30.<br />

Dosskey MG (2002). Setting priorities for research on pollution reduction functions of<br />

agricultural buffers. Environmental Management, 30(5), 641-650.<br />

Hefting MM, Bobbink R and de Caluwe H (2003). Nitrous oxide emission and<br />

denitrification in chronically nitrate-loaded riparian buffer zones. Journal of<br />

Environmental. Quality, 32(4).<br />

Reay DS (2004). Fertilizer “solution” could turn local problem global. Nature, 427,<br />

485.<br />

238

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!