Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX
Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX
Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
TACKLING DIFFUSE NITRATE POLLUTION: SWAPPING<br />
EUTROPHICATION FOR CLIMATE CHANGE?<br />
D Reay<br />
University of Edinburgh, School of Geosciences, Crew Building, West Mains Road,<br />
Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, UK, E-mail: david.reay@ed.sac.uk<br />
SUMMARY<br />
Large are<strong>as</strong> of the UK have now been designated ‘Nitrate Vulnerable Zones’ (NVZs)<br />
<strong>as</strong> a result of the high levels of nitrate in surface and groundwaters. Where nitrate<br />
is lost from the fields through drainage there are two main remediation strategies<br />
available. The first involves the creation of strips of uncultivated land, known <strong>as</strong><br />
‘buffer strips’ to intercept the leached nitrate before it gets into drainage waters. The<br />
other is designed to intercept any nitrate already in drainage waters by diverting the<br />
water through natural or constructed denitrifying wetlands.<br />
The use of both buffer strips, often in riparian zones, and denitrifying wetlands, h<strong>as</strong><br />
become incre<strong>as</strong>ingly widespread in the p<strong>as</strong>t few years (Mitch et al., 2001; Sabater et<br />
al., 2003), but doubts remain over their suitability in many are<strong>as</strong> (Dosskey, 2002). As<br />
well <strong>as</strong> the potential problem of leached nitrate by-p<strong>as</strong>sing the buffer strip and wetland<br />
soils, there is also a danger that denitrification in their soils - the primary process of<br />
nitrate removal – will lead to greatly incre<strong>as</strong>ed nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (Hefting<br />
et.al., 2003), so swapping a water pollution problem for a climate change issue (Reay,<br />
2004). Here we present a synthesis of N pollution swapping studies to date and<br />
introduce a wide-ranging project aimed at addressing this key issue.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Mitsch WJ, Day Jr JW, Gilliam JW, Groffman PM, Hey DL, Randall, GW and Wang N<br />
(2001). Reducing nitrogen loading to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River<br />
b<strong>as</strong>in: strategies to counter a persistent ecological problem. BioScience, 51(5), 373-<br />
388.<br />
Sabater S et al. (2003). Nitrogen removal by riparian buffers along a European climatic<br />
gradient: Patterns and factors of variation. Ecosystems, 6(1), 20-30.<br />
Dosskey MG (2002). Setting priorities for research on pollution reduction functions of<br />
agricultural buffers. Environmental Management, 30(5), 641-650.<br />
Hefting MM, Bobbink R and de Caluwe H (2003). Nitrous oxide emission and<br />
denitrification in chronically nitrate-loaded riparian buffer zones. Journal of<br />
Environmental. Quality, 32(4).<br />
Reay DS (2004). Fertilizer “solution” could turn local problem global. Nature, 427,<br />
485.<br />
238