22.01.2014 Views

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A third scenario w<strong>as</strong> applied to Clunie subcatchment with the aim of investigating<br />

any potential reduction in phosphorus in-loch concentrations, resulting from installing<br />

buffer strips on both sides of Lunan Burn in the Clunie subcatchment.<br />

First Scenario’s Description and Assumptions<br />

The aim of this scenario w<strong>as</strong> to check how sensitive the model is to the proportions<br />

of winter and spring cereals. Three sets of data were used: 1989, 1994 and 2004. The<br />

<strong>as</strong>sumptions made for this scenario are listed below:<br />

• First <strong>as</strong>sumption: P loss coefficients for arable land, in the P export rates table<br />

provided by MLURI for the purpose of this project, are representative of the<br />

proportion of winter and spring cereals in Lunan catchment for 1999 (control<br />

year).<br />

• Second <strong>as</strong>sumption: The model works for all five subcatchments, so the final<br />

outputs are not to be questioned. The numbers used in order to draw conclusions<br />

are not the actual output numbers for P loads in the lochs but the difference in the<br />

values between 1999 and 1989, 1994, 2004.<br />

• Third <strong>as</strong>sumption: Relative P loss coefficient for winter cereals is equal to 1<br />

and for spring cereals is equal to 0.39 b<strong>as</strong>ed on literature. Winter cereals were<br />

considered to be the same <strong>as</strong> having no best management practice applied and<br />

spring cereals were considered the same <strong>as</strong> conservation tillage.<br />

Applying this scenario involved modifying the export coefficients to better reflect<br />

land use (spring/winter cereals). In order for this to be accomplished the following<br />

steps were followed:<br />

a. A formula that calculated correction factors for P export rates b<strong>as</strong>ed on relative<br />

are<strong>as</strong> of winter/ spring crops w<strong>as</strong> created. The relative are<strong>as</strong> were calculated<br />

using agricultural census data per parish.<br />

b. P export table w<strong>as</strong> transformed according to the correction factors and a different<br />

table for each application (1989, 1994, 2004) w<strong>as</strong> produced.<br />

S<br />

TA . S + e<br />

W<br />

TA . W e<br />

Formula used to calculate P export coefficients: A e<br />

=<br />

(1)<br />

Where:<br />

A e is the P export coefficient for arable land.<br />

S and W are the are<strong>as</strong> of spring and winter cereals, respectively.<br />

TA is the area of total arable land.<br />

S e and W e are the P loss exports for spring and winter cereals,<br />

respectively.<br />

B<strong>as</strong>ed on the third <strong>as</strong>sumption: S e<br />

- 0.39 . W e (2)<br />

232

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!