22.01.2014 Views

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

established pond/wetland for nutrient removal and FIO mitigation. In summer 2005,<br />

water samples from the inlet and outlet of the pond were collected by ISCO 6712<br />

samplers equipped with an Area Velocity Flow 750 module and WAVECOM Modem<br />

Control, serviced by a FLOWLINK data retrieval package. Composite water sampling<br />

(10 shots per bottle) w<strong>as</strong> triggered by discharge at the inlet and by time (hourly)<br />

at the outlet because the stream cross-section below the outlet structure w<strong>as</strong> too<br />

wide for flow-b<strong>as</strong>ed sampling. Water samples were analysed for total N, total P and<br />

ammoniacal N (NH 4<br />

-N) using automated colorimetric methods and SS (m<strong>as</strong>s of dried<br />

solids retained on filter paper from a known volume of sample). Although bottles from<br />

the water samples were collected on a weekly b<strong>as</strong>is, comparison of fresh versus<br />

aged samples showed < 5% decline in ammoniacal N content. Discharge at the inlet<br />

w<strong>as</strong> estimated by the area-velocity method from 5-minute me<strong>as</strong>urements of water<br />

level and velocity. Outlet water level data showed that there w<strong>as</strong> little hydraulic delay<br />

in the system (about 1 hour) and that the water residence time during storm events is<br />

about 1 day. From the water sample analysis results, hourly interpolated water quality<br />

data were calculated for the monitoring period using a double-parabolic interpolation<br />

function (XlXtrFun, Advanced Systems Design and Development, 2003). These were<br />

then combined with hourly discharge data from the inlet to provide a continuous<br />

estimate of loads.<br />

Comparison of Biodiversity Between Existing Farm Pond/Wetland<br />

Systems<br />

To provide a me<strong>as</strong>ure of the habitat value of farm ponds/wetlands, vegetation and<br />

macroinvertebrates were surveyed in three systems in Scotland in July 2005: (i)<br />

Langside farm, Ayrshire (described above); (ii) Black Loch wetland, Lunan Lochs,<br />

Angus – an established wetland of ~ 1.5 ha area and ~ 20,000 m 3 volume (again<br />

constructed prior to best practice guidelines) that receives run-off from fields<br />

amended with poultry manure; (iii) a pond/wetland system designed in accordance<br />

with best practice guidelines and constructed in 2004 at Old C<strong>as</strong>tle mixed arable<br />

farm, Berwickshire. Each system w<strong>as</strong> arbitrarily divided into six compartments from<br />

inlet to outlet and within each compartment plant species were identified and counted<br />

in five randomly located 1-m x 1-m quadrats. Macroinvertebrates were sampled and<br />

identified to species level in each system using the National Pond Survey method<br />

(Biggs et al., 1998).<br />

RESULTS<br />

Performance of an Established Onstream Farm Pond/Wetland<br />

Inlet and outlet total P and discharge for Langside pond are shown in Figure 1. Total<br />

P concentrations at the inlet rise with inlet discharge, peaking during storm events,<br />

while outlet total P concentrations often exceed inlet concentrations. When compared<br />

with total P water quality standards for Scottish freshwater lochs (SEPA, 2002), the<br />

outlet water quality would be cl<strong>as</strong>sified <strong>as</strong> ‘hypertrophic’ (total P > 0.1 mg/L). To<br />

<strong>as</strong>sess the performance of the pond/wetland in pollutant removal, mean hydraulic<br />

load, and total N, total P, NH 4<br />

-N, and SS concentrations at the inlet and outlet were<br />

used to calculate the overall m<strong>as</strong>s removal efficiency (<strong>as</strong> % of inlet load) for five<br />

periods where continuous inlet–outlet data exist (Table 1). Removal of SS by the<br />

pond/wetland is good. The overall efficiency of removal of both N and P is poor, but<br />

64

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!