22.01.2014 Views

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

certain agri-environment options). Fuller details of the methods used for siting fenced<br />

are<strong>as</strong> and buffer strips are described and illustrated in the Farming and Watercourse<br />

Management Handbook (2000).<br />

Table 2:<br />

Use of Green’s Burn Buffer strip to reduce total P loading to Loch<br />

Leven<br />

Environmental quality<br />

objective<br />

Required pollutant<br />

mitigation<br />

Eutrophic restored to mesotrophic Loch<br />

Reduction of annual TP loading to Loch<br />

Leven from 0.5 to 0.2 g/m2<br />

Notes<br />

B<strong>as</strong>ed on OECD<br />

(1982)<br />

(=4.20 tonnes TP pa over 13.9 km2 loch<br />

area)<br />

BMP contribution Green’s Burn buffer strip reduces TP load Vinten et al. (2005)<br />

by estimated 0.38 tonnes TP pa<br />

BMP cost £12k pa (fencing and management) £5/m for fencing<br />

and £100/ha for RSS<br />

species rich gr<strong>as</strong>sland<br />

Cost-effectiveness =£12k/380kg = £32/kg TP<br />

Value of Loch Leven<br />

restoration<br />

Benefit:cost ratio<br />

FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS<br />

User value: £243k pa<br />

Non-user value: £290k pa<br />

Total: £533pa<br />

=(£533k/£12k)*(0.38t/4.2t)=4.0 (Good)<br />

Datab<strong>as</strong>e of Farm Scale Sources of Diffuse Pollution<br />

Frost and McTernan<br />

(1997)<br />

SEPA holds a significant amount of data on water quality, but data on farm scale<br />

sources of pollution are lacking. A datab<strong>as</strong>e giving information for each farm type,<br />

on source strength per pollutant, potential mitigation me<strong>as</strong>ures, cost-effectiveness,<br />

loadings mitigated and time scale for efficacy is proposed, building on <strong>as</strong>pects of<br />

the screening tool (Anthony et al., 2005). The datab<strong>as</strong>e would draw on the literature,<br />

but also on audits from the six farm types in SEPA’s survey (Frost et al., 2000), the<br />

SAC BMP farms in SEERAD-funded project SAC/348/03 (Table 3), and relevant<br />

catchments where farm scale data are available. These catchments include Tarland<br />

(MI), Glensaugh (MI), Ythan (MI); Lunan (MI/SAC), Piltanton (SAC/MI), Leven (SAC/MI),<br />

Cessnock (SAC/MI/CREH), Nairn (SAC/CREH), Brighouse (SAC/MI/CREH), Ettrick<br />

(SAC/CREH), Sandyhills, Bush (SAC/MI). The datab<strong>as</strong>e would dovetail with SEPA’s<br />

‘BMP Manual’ and could be put on a website. The output would form the focus for<br />

ongoing improvement of estimates, <strong>as</strong> information from future projects, particularly<br />

the results of the SEERAD work packages (WP3.4 Me<strong>as</strong>urement of water quality;<br />

WP 3.5 Management of water quality) and Defra Catchment Sensitive Farming, etc.<br />

becomes available.<br />

Policy Matrix<br />

A policy matrix, i.e. a summary of recommended me<strong>as</strong>ures, prioritised and categorised<br />

into proposed appropriate levels of regulation, for mapping of on-farm me<strong>as</strong>ures<br />

against policy instruments, voluntary me<strong>as</strong>ures and potential GBRs etc., is required.<br />

107

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!