Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX
Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX
Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
certain agri-environment options). Fuller details of the methods used for siting fenced<br />
are<strong>as</strong> and buffer strips are described and illustrated in the Farming and Watercourse<br />
Management Handbook (2000).<br />
Table 2:<br />
Use of Green’s Burn Buffer strip to reduce total P loading to Loch<br />
Leven<br />
Environmental quality<br />
objective<br />
Required pollutant<br />
mitigation<br />
Eutrophic restored to mesotrophic Loch<br />
Reduction of annual TP loading to Loch<br />
Leven from 0.5 to 0.2 g/m2<br />
Notes<br />
B<strong>as</strong>ed on OECD<br />
(1982)<br />
(=4.20 tonnes TP pa over 13.9 km2 loch<br />
area)<br />
BMP contribution Green’s Burn buffer strip reduces TP load Vinten et al. (2005)<br />
by estimated 0.38 tonnes TP pa<br />
BMP cost £12k pa (fencing and management) £5/m for fencing<br />
and £100/ha for RSS<br />
species rich gr<strong>as</strong>sland<br />
Cost-effectiveness =£12k/380kg = £32/kg TP<br />
Value of Loch Leven<br />
restoration<br />
Benefit:cost ratio<br />
FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS<br />
User value: £243k pa<br />
Non-user value: £290k pa<br />
Total: £533pa<br />
=(£533k/£12k)*(0.38t/4.2t)=4.0 (Good)<br />
Datab<strong>as</strong>e of Farm Scale Sources of Diffuse Pollution<br />
Frost and McTernan<br />
(1997)<br />
SEPA holds a significant amount of data on water quality, but data on farm scale<br />
sources of pollution are lacking. A datab<strong>as</strong>e giving information for each farm type,<br />
on source strength per pollutant, potential mitigation me<strong>as</strong>ures, cost-effectiveness,<br />
loadings mitigated and time scale for efficacy is proposed, building on <strong>as</strong>pects of<br />
the screening tool (Anthony et al., 2005). The datab<strong>as</strong>e would draw on the literature,<br />
but also on audits from the six farm types in SEPA’s survey (Frost et al., 2000), the<br />
SAC BMP farms in SEERAD-funded project SAC/348/03 (Table 3), and relevant<br />
catchments where farm scale data are available. These catchments include Tarland<br />
(MI), Glensaugh (MI), Ythan (MI); Lunan (MI/SAC), Piltanton (SAC/MI), Leven (SAC/MI),<br />
Cessnock (SAC/MI/CREH), Nairn (SAC/CREH), Brighouse (SAC/MI/CREH), Ettrick<br />
(SAC/CREH), Sandyhills, Bush (SAC/MI). The datab<strong>as</strong>e would dovetail with SEPA’s<br />
‘BMP Manual’ and could be put on a website. The output would form the focus for<br />
ongoing improvement of estimates, <strong>as</strong> information from future projects, particularly<br />
the results of the SEERAD work packages (WP3.4 Me<strong>as</strong>urement of water quality;<br />
WP 3.5 Management of water quality) and Defra Catchment Sensitive Farming, etc.<br />
becomes available.<br />
Policy Matrix<br />
A policy matrix, i.e. a summary of recommended me<strong>as</strong>ures, prioritised and categorised<br />
into proposed appropriate levels of regulation, for mapping of on-farm me<strong>as</strong>ures<br />
against policy instruments, voluntary me<strong>as</strong>ures and potential GBRs etc., is required.<br />
107