Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX
Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX
Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
• The discharge shall not contain drainage from chemical, oil or other polluting<br />
matter loading/unloading/handling are<strong>as</strong>.<br />
• Do not dispose of oil, paint or paint thinners, pesticides, detergents, disinfectants<br />
or other pollutants into a surface drainage system, or allow any material that might<br />
impair its performance and function to enter a surface water drainage system.<br />
GBRs, Registration or Licences?<br />
The CAR regulatory regime allows for three levels of authorisation (Part II, regulations<br />
7–10), and SEPA may serve a notice on a person responsible for an activity, to<br />
change the level of authorisation (regulation 11). The most b<strong>as</strong>ic level is the General<br />
Binding Rule (GBR); essentially this way of controlling activity simply establishes the<br />
requirements to prevent environmental harm. It is an offence to carry out the activity<br />
in breech of those requirements. A precedent is the way the oil storage regulations<br />
have been established in England and Wales, and the successive regulations across<br />
the UK for controlling pollution risks <strong>as</strong>sociated with the storage of silage, slurry and<br />
agricultural fuel oil. For existing establishments there is no need to register with the<br />
regulatory agency, but enforcement can be undertaken by notices on inspection.<br />
The GBR is therefore the le<strong>as</strong>t bureaucratic regulatory option. To quote the recent<br />
rural diffuse pollution consultation by the Scottish Executive (2005):<br />
‘…<strong>as</strong> far <strong>as</strong> is practicable, the b<strong>as</strong>ic level of authorisation, national GBRs, should be<br />
used <strong>as</strong> the b<strong>as</strong>is of control. This minimises the regulatory burden on the industry,<br />
while requiring a b<strong>as</strong>ic minimum of action to be taken to prevent pollution…’<br />
Registration is the next level of authorisation, requiring the farmer to register the farm<br />
with SEPA, and to comply with a simple set of pollution control me<strong>as</strong>ures. A fee will<br />
be payable to cover administrative costs; there could also be a subsistence charge<br />
to cover the costs for SEPA of inspections and meetings on the farms and <strong>as</strong>sociated<br />
office work. For the rare situations where a particular farm or other rural enterprise<br />
is individually significant in a catchment, then SEPA may require an authorisation<br />
in the form of a licence for the farm. That would allow for site-specific conditions,<br />
rechargeable costs for monitoring and inspection.<br />
Licences have previously been held by many farmers, for example for septic<br />
tank discharges under COPA and earlier legislation, and more recently under the<br />
groundwater regulations. Under the CAR, these will be transferred to become either<br />
registrations or licences.<br />
What is Missing in CAR for Managing Diffuse Pollution from Rural<br />
Sources?<br />
The gaps are how to control the individually minor but collectively significant impacts;<br />
background contamination that is a function of land-use – <strong>as</strong> identified in the Scottish<br />
Executive consultation (2005) Diffuse Water Pollution from Rural Land Use. The<br />
SEPA strategy document for managing diffuse pollution (SEPA, 2004) highlighted<br />
the importance of the Best Management Practices (BMPs) approach developed<br />
in the USA (see chapter 2 in Campbell et al., 2004, definitions and discussions in<br />
Novotny 2003, and D’Arcy and Frost, 2001). Many of the BMPs in those references<br />
are addressing <strong>as</strong>pects of farming and forestry practice that have not hitherto been<br />
195