Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX
Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX
Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Studies on a drained clay soil at Brimstone Farm in Oxfordshire (Williams et al.,<br />
2006) showed that when cattle slurry applications timings were moved from autumn<br />
to spring to reduce nitrate leaching losses, elevated ammonium-N concentrations<br />
of up to 3.9 mg/L NH 4<br />
-N (c. fivefold greater than the EC Freshwater Fish Directive<br />
limit of 0.78 mg/l NH 4<br />
-N) were me<strong>as</strong>ured in the spring drainage water flows. This<br />
w<strong>as</strong> because rainfall after the spring slurry application caused contaminated water<br />
to move rapidly from the ‘wet’ soil surface to pipe drains, via the network of soil<br />
macropores and mole drains in the heavy clay soil.<br />
Figure 2: Ammonia emissions after cattle slurry applications to gr<strong>as</strong>sland<br />
(Williams et al., 2005b)<br />
These data indicate that there is a need to recognise that slurry management practices<br />
that aim to reduce nitrate leaching losses by moving from autumn to spring/summer<br />
application timings, may exacerbate ammonia volatilisation losses under warmer<br />
and drier soil conditions, and incre<strong>as</strong>e the risks of other nutrient pollution of drainage<br />
waters from clay soils.<br />
Broiler Litter<br />
Assuming that all of the broiler litter w<strong>as</strong> previously applied in the autumn, nitrate<br />
leaching losses after surface broadc<strong>as</strong>t applications on the sandy soil Nottinghamshire<br />
farm were estimated at 9,650 kg N (equivalent to 13 % of total N applied). Changing<br />
the application timing from autumn to spring incre<strong>as</strong>ed the fertiliser N replacement<br />
value of the broiler litter by £3,860, <strong>as</strong> a result of reduced nitrate leaching losses.<br />
The capital cost of purch<strong>as</strong>ing a spreader that w<strong>as</strong> capable of applying broiler litter<br />
evenly and at agronomically required rates w<strong>as</strong> £22,000, giving an annual amortised<br />
repayment cost of £2,860 (over 10 years). Overall, the net benefit to the farm w<strong>as</strong><br />
£1,000/year. However, the practical problems of topdressing broiler litter to growing<br />
crops in spring (i.e. soil trafficability problems, non-compatibility of machine spread<br />
widths with tramline spacings and potential odour/fly nuisance) is likely to make<br />
such an application policy impractical on most farms. On suitable soil types, such<br />
<strong>as</strong> the sandy soils on the Nottinghamshire model farm, the rapid soil incorporation<br />
of broiler litter before the establishment of spring sown crops would reduce<br />
90