22.01.2014 Views

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 2:<br />

The removal rates of sediment and P-pollutants by the multiple<br />

structures system during different types of run-off events<br />

System input<br />

System<br />

output<br />

Removal<br />

rate (%)<br />

SRH* SRV SRO SRC Total<br />

Continuous run-off events<br />

TSS (kg) 2784.3 821.1 16.2 89.3 3710.9 1235.2 66.7<br />

TP (kg) 0.127 0.812 0.062 0.101 1.102 0.433 60.7<br />

TDP (kg) 0.047 0.300 0.023 0.037 0.407 0.210 48.4<br />

DRP (kg) 0.037 0.235 0.018 0.029 0.319 0.181 43.3<br />

Discontinuous run-off events<br />

TSS (kg) 2249.2 2582.6 59.3 232.2 5123.3 20.6 99.6<br />

TP (kg) 0.218 1.908 0.097 0.259 2.482 0.014 99.4<br />

TDP (kg) 0.081 0.706 0.036 0.096 0.918 0.005 99.5<br />

DRP (kg) 0.063 0.551 0.028 0.075 0.717 0.004 99.4<br />

*SRH, surface run-off from hilly land; SRV, surface run-off from village; SRO, surface<br />

run-off from orchard; SRC, surface run-off from cropland.<br />

SEDIMENT AND P-POLLUTANTS REMOVAL CONTRAST<br />

Removal Efficiency of the Multiple Structures System<br />

The loads of sediment and P-pollutants exported from the outlet of the watershed<br />

were reduced to a great degree after gradual removal by each buffer/detention<br />

structure upslope to downslope. But the removal effectiveness w<strong>as</strong> different due<br />

to the different hydrological characteristics of continuous and discontinuous runoff.<br />

For example, during continuous run-off events, the total input loads of TSS,<br />

TP, TDP, DRP by surface run-off were 3710.9 kg, 1.102 kg and 0.407 kg, 0.319 kg,<br />

respectively. Their exports from the system were 1235.2 kg, 0.433 kg, 0.210 kg<br />

and 0.181 kg, respectively (Table 2). The removal rates were 66.7%, 60.7%, 48.4%<br />

and 43.3%, respectively. Comparatively, during discontinuous run-off events, the<br />

total input loads of TSS, TP, TDP, DRP by surface run-off were 5123.3 kg, 2.482 kg,<br />

0.918 kg and 0.717 kg, respectively, with total export loads only of 20.6 kg, 0.014 kg,<br />

0.005 kg, 0.004 kg, respectively. Their removal rates all exceeded 99%. These high<br />

removal rates of pollutants mainly resulted from the intermittent transport process of<br />

polluted run-off.<br />

Removal Efficiency of Single Structure<br />

Due to differences in physical characteristics, spatial location in the watershed, main<br />

removal mechanisms and degree of disturbance by humans among these structures,<br />

removal efficiency of each single structure w<strong>as</strong> different too. During continuous runoff<br />

events, due to the huge storage capacity and long detention time of dry ponds,<br />

they had the highest removal rate of TSS, TP, TDP and DRP, of which were 34.6%,<br />

34.3%, 20.5% and 17.3%, respectively. For dissolved forms of P-pollutants (TDP,<br />

DRP), a gr<strong>as</strong>sed filter strip had higher removal rates (Table 3). This mainly contributed<br />

to the higher infiltration rate of water resulting from dense roots of vegetation and<br />

117

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!