22.01.2014 Views

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Effecting a Change in Practices<br />

Farmers in the original (1996) NVZ designation were surveyed at the start of<br />

designation and again in 2003. This re-survey (Scott et al., 2003) allowed an analysis<br />

of the factors (e.g. previous cropping, fertiliser and manure use) taken into account<br />

by farmers within the NVZs when making decisions about fertilisers. For all of the<br />

main factors, farmers were <strong>as</strong>ked to record the frequency with which they took that<br />

factor into account. Responses were ranked from 1–5 (1 = always, 5 = never), so<br />

that an average score could be calculated for each factor. All of these mean scores<br />

were lower in 2003 than in 1996, for both fertiliser and manure planning. The biggest<br />

change w<strong>as</strong> in ‘recent application of organic manures’. This suggests that farmers<br />

in the NVZs are taking the major factors into account more often, before spreading<br />

manure/fertiliser on their fields. In 2001, the BSFP indicated that, although few<br />

farmers used its tables of recommendations, 42% were aware of the RB209 fertiliser<br />

recommendations book (Goodl<strong>as</strong>s et al., 2002). In a later survey (2004) of farmer use<br />

of decision support tools such <strong>as</strong> the RB209 and software such <strong>as</strong> MANNER and<br />

‘your farm and NVZs’, farmers were less likely to have used the software than would<br />

advisers/consultants (Chambers, 2004). In this survey, around 30% of arable farmers<br />

and 20% of gr<strong>as</strong>sland farmers indicated that RB209 had a major influence on their<br />

fertiliser planning.<br />

Recent BSFP results (Goodl<strong>as</strong>s and Welch, 2005) suggest that, for several crops,<br />

N fertiliser inputs are being reduced in the presence of organic manures (Table 1).<br />

Except for potatoes the amount of reduction is greater in farms within NVZ designated<br />

are<strong>as</strong>.<br />

Table 1:<br />

Effect of NVZ designation on reduction in applied fertilizer N in<br />

presence of manure<br />

Crop NVZ N reduction (kg/ha)<br />

Winter wheat No -4<br />

Winter wheat Yes -16<br />

Winter oilseed rape No -31<br />

Winter oilseed rape Yes -45<br />

Potatoes No +27<br />

Potatoes Yes +22<br />

Sugar beet No +27<br />

Sugar beet Yes -19<br />

Forage maize No -33<br />

Forage maize Yes -74<br />

Impact of Legislation<br />

As indicated above, the NVZ legislation h<strong>as</strong> had an effect on the factors farmers<br />

take into account when making decisions and there is evidence (Scott et al., 2003)<br />

that livestock farmers (especially those in the pig/poultry sector) have found this<br />

legislation h<strong>as</strong> had a big impact on their farming practices. It is too early to say<br />

what impact Cross Compliance and the Stewardship Schemes will have on farmer<br />

183

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!