22.01.2014 Views

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Environmental Monitoring<br />

The primary water quality parameters examined were the faecal indicator compliance<br />

parameters of total coliform organisms, faecal coliform organisms and intestinal<br />

enterococci. In addition, the following physico-chemical parameters were me<strong>as</strong>ured:<br />

nitrate, nitrite, ammoniacal nitrogen and orthophosphate.<br />

The pre-remediation monitoring team of SAC, CREH and the Macaulay Institute<br />

w<strong>as</strong> deployed in October 2003. The timing of this deployment w<strong>as</strong> to acquire water<br />

quality data <strong>as</strong> close <strong>as</strong> possible to the ‘summer’ catchment condition. However,<br />

the period of pre-remediation monitoring w<strong>as</strong> out with the bathing se<strong>as</strong>on of June<br />

to September. Complementary investigations suggested that there may be a strong<br />

se<strong>as</strong>onality in the high flow concentration of faecal indicators in streams draining<br />

are<strong>as</strong> of livestock farming, with the highest concentrations evident in the summer<br />

period when stock were present in the catchment fields.<br />

Figure 1: Subcatchment and monitoring stations<br />

Given the timing of the pre-remediation sampling two options were possible. First,<br />

the monitoring could be undertaken in the same se<strong>as</strong>on (i.e. October to November<br />

2004) which should minimise the effects of se<strong>as</strong>onality in the temporal comparison<br />

in water quality pre- and post-remediation. This option w<strong>as</strong>, perhaps, the most<br />

‘conservative’ but it would result in no data having been acquired during the bathing<br />

se<strong>as</strong>on itself during either pre- or post-remediation ph<strong>as</strong>es with the inherent risk that<br />

it would fail to pick up the impacts of farming and other activities on the catchment<br />

which only occurred in the period of the bathing se<strong>as</strong>on. Second, the monitoring<br />

130

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!