Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX
Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX
Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
BMP me<strong>as</strong>ure 1 (exclusion of stock from watercourses) w<strong>as</strong> readily understood and<br />
appreciated from the <strong>as</strong>pect of reducing the risk of diffuse pollution so long <strong>as</strong> an<br />
alternative reliable water supply w<strong>as</strong> able to be installed.<br />
BMP me<strong>as</strong>ure 2 (buffer strips) were also acceptable in most circumstances, but with<br />
varying tolerance of the amount of land take involved. The theory is understood, but<br />
not always will the ideal width of buffer strip be allowed on all farms.<br />
BMP me<strong>as</strong>ure 3 (stock removal from wetlands) will not be applicable on all farms,<br />
but within the catchment area where other BMPs were installed three wetland are<strong>as</strong><br />
were identified for exclusion from stock access. There are other wetlands in other<br />
parts of the catchment that are still open to stock. Farmers are aware that grazing<br />
value is low, but are also concerned that these are<strong>as</strong> will have to be managed in a<br />
different way to become a wildlife habitat and to prevent the growth of unsightly or<br />
inv<strong>as</strong>ive vegetation.<br />
Me<strong>as</strong>ure 4 (farm ponds) w<strong>as</strong> by far the most difficult me<strong>as</strong>ure that SAC promoted<br />
within the catchment. Farmers are environmentally aware but some could not see<br />
the need for farm ponds to treat lightly contaminated water. Farmers want alternative<br />
systems to treat ‘dirty water’, but under current regulations ponds would not be<br />
permitted to treat such water. The amount of land (and number of ponds) required<br />
to treat such water to an acceptable discharge quality could be very large. However,<br />
advantage can be taken of existing wetlands by isolating them from livestock.<br />
BMP me<strong>as</strong>ure 5 (removal of shallow crossings over watercourses) will involve either<br />
land take or involve a considerable amount of engineering to deepen the watercourse<br />
and avoid the land take.<br />
Me<strong>as</strong>ure 6 (removal of short lengths of ditch by piping) will have been carried out<br />
on farms for different re<strong>as</strong>ons, such <strong>as</strong> making parts of fields more accessible for<br />
silage making. Farmers will generally be willing to adopt this me<strong>as</strong>ure <strong>as</strong> an aid to<br />
production. However, this activity should not be used extensively <strong>as</strong> it contravenes<br />
SEPA’s position on avoiding new culverts.<br />
Fundamental to BMP me<strong>as</strong>ure 7 is to provide water from a natural source. This makes<br />
the supply sustainable and should, in theory, result in no change in the amount of<br />
water being taken from the watercourses. Apart from minor maintenance it h<strong>as</strong><br />
a nil ongoing cost, unlike a metered water supply. An important consideration in<br />
designing such a BMP is the level of abstraction given the regulations flowing from<br />
the Water Environment and Water Services (Scotland) Act 2003.<br />
WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS<br />
Low Flows<br />
Mean concentrations of faecal indicator compliance parameters under dry weather<br />
conditions, are generally low. There is a slight elevation in their concentrations during<br />
low flows in the summer bathing se<strong>as</strong>on. However, the low flow fluxes represent a<br />
very small proportion of the total flux in the bathing se<strong>as</strong>on and seem not to impact<br />
on compliance with Directive 76/160/EEC (Wyer et al., 1997)<br />
132