22.01.2014 Views

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• It should be possible to apply Water Quality Standards, <strong>as</strong> required by the WFD,<br />

within a TMDL approach. The development of load thresholds would be required<br />

to <strong>as</strong>sess those pollutants potentially resulting in a cumulative impact on water<br />

quality or ecosystem health. This is system specific (i.e. to discharge point and<br />

sensitive species’ etc.).<br />

• Diffuse pollution ‘hotspots’ can be targeted using the TMDL approach. This is<br />

consistent with the risk-b<strong>as</strong>ed approach identified within the WFD.<br />

• Source apportionment is central to the successful implementation of a TMDL and<br />

is identified within the WFD directive <strong>as</strong> a means of managing pollution.<br />

• Many elements of the TMDL process are similar to those that are applied with<br />

River B<strong>as</strong>in Management Plans (RBMPs), thus it may be possible to integrate<br />

TMDL targets and procedures into RBMPs.<br />

• SEPA’s diffuse pollution screening tool and proposed diffuse pollution monitoring<br />

strategy are broadly compliant with the <strong>as</strong>sessment and monitoring tools<br />

promoted with the TMDL approach.<br />

In summary, elements of the TMDL approach may have relevance to managing diffuse<br />

pollution, particularly in relation to providing a planning framework for identifying and<br />

implementing me<strong>as</strong>ures to address diffuse pollution pressures. Subsequent papers<br />

in this conference provide further details of the TMDL approach.<br />

RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLANNING<br />

A RBMP must be produced for each river b<strong>as</strong>in district. These plans set out the<br />

characteristics, pressures and impacts of the district, including a list of the waterb<strong>as</strong>ed<br />

protected are<strong>as</strong> and an economic <strong>as</strong>sessment of water services. They<br />

must also provide a summary of monitoring carried out and the consultation and<br />

participation opportunities given to interested parties. Finally, they should list the<br />

environmental objectives to be met and summarise a programme of me<strong>as</strong>ures<br />

designed to deliver those objectives.<br />

The programme of me<strong>as</strong>ures within each RBMP will consist of a combination of the<br />

most cost effective me<strong>as</strong>ures that will include:<br />

• controls under the CAR regime delivered by SEPA;<br />

• regulatory regimes operated by other responsible authorities;<br />

• economic instruments such <strong>as</strong> agricultural support and forestry grants; and<br />

• voluntary me<strong>as</strong>ures such <strong>as</strong> initiatives to improve habitat quality and education<br />

initiatives, for example, to address urban diffuse pollution.<br />

The river b<strong>as</strong>in planning process is an ongoing one which protects, improves and<br />

promotes sustainable development and use of the water environment between each<br />

published RBMP (Figure 3). There is flexibility within river b<strong>as</strong>in planning which will<br />

ensure that objectives set within each RBMP are achievable and affordable, and that<br />

the plans are able to consider strategic trends, drivers and issues affecting the water<br />

environment (SEPA, 2005).<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!