22.01.2014 Views

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the cost of these financial investments will be partly offset by incre<strong>as</strong>ed manure<br />

fertiliser N replacement values (resulting from reduced nitrate and ammonia losses)<br />

and incre<strong>as</strong>ed spreading opportunities for slurry throughout the cropping se<strong>as</strong>on.<br />

Plate 1:<br />

Trailing hose slurry application to winter wheat (left) and trailing<br />

shoe slurry application on gr<strong>as</strong>sland (right)<br />

This paper quantifies the economic implications of changing manure management<br />

practices to minimise nitrate leaching and ammonia volatilisation losses on model<br />

pig, dairy and broiler farms on contr<strong>as</strong>ting soil types and under different climatic<br />

conditions.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

The impacts of changing manure application timings from autumn (August–October)<br />

to spring/summer (February–July) on nitrate leaching losses and ammonia emissions<br />

were quantified for six model livestock farms (Table 1). The amount of nitrogen applied<br />

to land w<strong>as</strong> estimated b<strong>as</strong>ed on standard livestock N production figures (Anon,<br />

2000). For the dairy farms, it w<strong>as</strong> <strong>as</strong>sumed that 60% of the estimated N production<br />

w<strong>as</strong> spread <strong>as</strong> slurry, with the remainder deposited during spring/summer grazing.<br />

For the pig and broiler farms, it w<strong>as</strong> <strong>as</strong>sumed that all of the estimated N production<br />

w<strong>as</strong> returned to land via manure applications.<br />

N Losses<br />

Data from experiments carried out on a range of soil types (Chambers et al., 2000;<br />

Williams et al., 2005a), where nitrate leaching losses were me<strong>as</strong>ured after autumn<br />

surface broadc<strong>as</strong>t applications of slurry or broiler litter, were used to estimate nitrate<br />

leaching losses <strong>as</strong> a percentage of the total N applied. Ammonia emissions were<br />

estimated using MANNER (Chambers et al., 1999) <strong>as</strong>suming a slurry dry matter<br />

content of 4% for pig slurry and 6% for cattle slurry. Slurry bandspreading w<strong>as</strong><br />

<strong>as</strong>sumed to reduce ammonia losses by 30% compared with surface broadc<strong>as</strong>ting<br />

(Chambers et al., 2001).<br />

Storage Capacity and Spreading Equipment<br />

The existing slurry storage capacity w<strong>as</strong> <strong>as</strong>sumed to be 3 months for the model dairy<br />

farms and 4 months for the model pig farms, which is typical of current commercial<br />

practice (Smith et al., 2000, 2001). On the dairy farms, it w<strong>as</strong> <strong>as</strong>sumed that slurry<br />

could be spread in spring from early February to late March and to silage aftermaths<br />

in the summer (i.e. an August to January no spread period). To avoid the need to<br />

85

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!