Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX
Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX
Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
the cost of these financial investments will be partly offset by incre<strong>as</strong>ed manure<br />
fertiliser N replacement values (resulting from reduced nitrate and ammonia losses)<br />
and incre<strong>as</strong>ed spreading opportunities for slurry throughout the cropping se<strong>as</strong>on.<br />
Plate 1:<br />
Trailing hose slurry application to winter wheat (left) and trailing<br />
shoe slurry application on gr<strong>as</strong>sland (right)<br />
This paper quantifies the economic implications of changing manure management<br />
practices to minimise nitrate leaching and ammonia volatilisation losses on model<br />
pig, dairy and broiler farms on contr<strong>as</strong>ting soil types and under different climatic<br />
conditions.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
The impacts of changing manure application timings from autumn (August–October)<br />
to spring/summer (February–July) on nitrate leaching losses and ammonia emissions<br />
were quantified for six model livestock farms (Table 1). The amount of nitrogen applied<br />
to land w<strong>as</strong> estimated b<strong>as</strong>ed on standard livestock N production figures (Anon,<br />
2000). For the dairy farms, it w<strong>as</strong> <strong>as</strong>sumed that 60% of the estimated N production<br />
w<strong>as</strong> spread <strong>as</strong> slurry, with the remainder deposited during spring/summer grazing.<br />
For the pig and broiler farms, it w<strong>as</strong> <strong>as</strong>sumed that all of the estimated N production<br />
w<strong>as</strong> returned to land via manure applications.<br />
N Losses<br />
Data from experiments carried out on a range of soil types (Chambers et al., 2000;<br />
Williams et al., 2005a), where nitrate leaching losses were me<strong>as</strong>ured after autumn<br />
surface broadc<strong>as</strong>t applications of slurry or broiler litter, were used to estimate nitrate<br />
leaching losses <strong>as</strong> a percentage of the total N applied. Ammonia emissions were<br />
estimated using MANNER (Chambers et al., 1999) <strong>as</strong>suming a slurry dry matter<br />
content of 4% for pig slurry and 6% for cattle slurry. Slurry bandspreading w<strong>as</strong><br />
<strong>as</strong>sumed to reduce ammonia losses by 30% compared with surface broadc<strong>as</strong>ting<br />
(Chambers et al., 2001).<br />
Storage Capacity and Spreading Equipment<br />
The existing slurry storage capacity w<strong>as</strong> <strong>as</strong>sumed to be 3 months for the model dairy<br />
farms and 4 months for the model pig farms, which is typical of current commercial<br />
practice (Smith et al., 2000, 2001). On the dairy farms, it w<strong>as</strong> <strong>as</strong>sumed that slurry<br />
could be spread in spring from early February to late March and to silage aftermaths<br />
in the summer (i.e. an August to January no spread period). To avoid the need to<br />
85