22.01.2014 Views

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

Download as a PDF - CiteSeerX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

factors influencing a polluter’s willingness to change behaviour and practices. There<br />

w<strong>as</strong> no doubt that prior to the recent reform of the Common Agricultural Policy,<br />

when the farm payments system drove farmers to ever more intensive practices, it<br />

would have taken a hugely expensive regulatory and educational effort to counter<br />

that economic driver and prevent the environmental impacts of agriculture.<br />

Figure 1: Minimizing regulation (Campbell et al., 2004)<br />

It is hoped that the scenario presented in Figure 1B is now more applicable, with<br />

economic support now more aligned with the environmental drivers, allowing the<br />

adoption of a lighter touch for regulation.<br />

Managing diffuse pollution under the provisions of the WEWS Act 2003 and<br />

regulations in CAR 2005<br />

There is considerable scope for controlling pollution from diffuse sources under<br />

these statutes. Enforcement is predicated on the identified activity having an<br />

individually significant impact, at the scale of individuals undertaking the activity.<br />

At first sight that seems to rule out most of the significant diffuse source loads in<br />

a rural catchment, but it does allow for intervention in relation to diffuse pollution<br />

hotspots. Thus in circumstances where evidence of environmental impacts upstream<br />

and downstream of an activity can be collected, then there is an evidential b<strong>as</strong>is for<br />

enforcement action, just <strong>as</strong> there would have been under COPA (1974 Control of<br />

Pollution Act). SEPA will also be able to serve notices to require corrective me<strong>as</strong>ures<br />

in such circumstances. This sort of regulatory control would apply to incidents where<br />

pollution is caused and a particular farm and farmer can be held responsible. The<br />

CAR 2005 provisions allow for the prevention of further such pollution, by embodying<br />

the necessary prevention conditions in a registration or licence. Example scenarios<br />

are given below.<br />

The CAR offence provisions are set out in regulation 40 and, for example in relation to<br />

pollution incidents (diffuse pollution hotspots), provisions covering powers to serve<br />

notices and undertake work and recover costs, are set out in regulations 28, 29 and<br />

31.<br />

193

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!