05.03.2014 Views

Review of the Registered Clubs Industry in NSW - Clubs NSW

Review of the Registered Clubs Industry in NSW - Clubs NSW

Review of the Registered Clubs Industry in NSW - Clubs NSW

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6 Streng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial viability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> registered<br />

clubs <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

6.1.4 The level <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial viability among <strong>in</strong>dividual clubs varies widely<br />

Evidence presented to IPART <strong>in</strong> submissions and roundtables (and borne out by<br />

IPART’s <strong>in</strong>vestigations <strong>of</strong> case study clubs) <strong>in</strong>dicates that <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial health <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual registered clubs varies significantly. Some are very pr<strong>of</strong>itable, o<strong>the</strong>rs are<br />

marg<strong>in</strong>ally pr<strong>of</strong>itable, and some face serious viability issues <strong>in</strong> both <strong>the</strong> short and<br />

long term.<br />

In a submission, <strong>Clubs</strong><strong>NSW</strong> provided data on <strong>the</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong> clubs by size (<strong>in</strong><br />

terms <strong>of</strong> gam<strong>in</strong>g revenue 98 ) considered to be pr<strong>of</strong>itable <strong>in</strong> 2007, and <strong>the</strong> proportions<br />

considered to be marg<strong>in</strong>ally pr<strong>of</strong>itable or non-pr<strong>of</strong>itable (Table 6.5). 99 These data<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicate that <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> clubs were pr<strong>of</strong>itable (around 68 per cent), while a<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r 14 per cent were marg<strong>in</strong>ally pr<strong>of</strong>itable and around 18 per cent were not<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>itable.<br />

Table 6.5 Proportion <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>itable and non-pr<strong>of</strong>itable clubs by size ($ gam<strong>in</strong>g<br />

mach<strong>in</strong>e revenue) 2007<br />

Club size<br />

Non-pr<strong>of</strong>itable<br />

(%)<br />

Marg<strong>in</strong>ally<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>itable (%)<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>itable<br />

(%)<br />

0-200K 23.8 7.9 68.3<br />

>200K – 1m 17.0 18.2 64.8<br />

>1m – 5m 18.8 11.7 69.5<br />

>5m – 10m 21.7 19.6 58.7<br />

> 10m 8.3 14.6 77.1<br />

Total clubs 18.2 13.9 67.8<br />

Source: Allen Consult<strong>in</strong>g Group, Socio-Economic Impact Study <strong>of</strong> <strong>Clubs</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>NSW</strong> (2007) 2008, p 22.<br />

98 See section 2.2.2 for a description <strong>of</strong> classification by size based on gam<strong>in</strong>g revenue.<br />

99 <strong>Clubs</strong><strong>NSW</strong> submission, 4 April 2008, p 19.<br />

96 IPART <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Registered</strong> <strong>Clubs</strong> <strong>Industry</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>NSW</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!