Review of the Registered Clubs Industry in NSW - Clubs NSW
Review of the Registered Clubs Industry in NSW - Clubs NSW
Review of the Registered Clubs Industry in NSW - Clubs NSW
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4 Measur<strong>in</strong>g and report<strong>in</strong>g on club contributions<br />
4.1 IPART’s preferred approach for measur<strong>in</strong>g clubs’ social<br />
contributions<br />
Dur<strong>in</strong>g IPART’s consultation process, stakeholders made few comments on <strong>the</strong><br />
methodology for identify<strong>in</strong>g and record<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> clubs <strong>in</strong>dustry’s social<br />
contributions – probably because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> complexity and difficulty <strong>of</strong> this issue.<br />
Some submissions suggested that clubs’ social contributions should be measured <strong>in</strong><br />
terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir ‘net contribution’, <strong>in</strong> recognition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fact that clubs impose costs on<br />
communities as well as benefits. 70 However, IPART’s terms <strong>of</strong> reference ask it to<br />
identify <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> clubs <strong>in</strong>dustry’s provision <strong>of</strong> social <strong>in</strong>frastructure and<br />
services. This means that <strong>the</strong> methodology needs to <strong>in</strong>volve a valuation exercise,<br />
ra<strong>the</strong>r than a cost benefit analysis. Never<strong>the</strong>less, IPART has not ignored <strong>the</strong> costs<br />
imposed by <strong>the</strong> clubs <strong>in</strong>dustry – as Chapter 3 discussed, it exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong>se costs <strong>in</strong><br />
assess<strong>in</strong>g whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> net social contributions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry justify ongo<strong>in</strong>g<br />
government support.<br />
IPART considers that <strong>the</strong> total value <strong>of</strong> clubs’ provision <strong>of</strong> social <strong>in</strong>frastructure and<br />
services should be calculated as <strong>the</strong> sum <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g components:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The value <strong>of</strong> direct, cash contributions made to charities, community and<br />
sport<strong>in</strong>g-related activities.<br />
The estimated value <strong>of</strong> direct, <strong>in</strong>-k<strong>in</strong>d provision and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance <strong>of</strong> community<br />
and sport<strong>in</strong>g facilities and <strong>in</strong>frastructure (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g bowl<strong>in</strong>g greens, gyms and<br />
tennis courts, as well as meet<strong>in</strong>g rooms and o<strong>the</strong>r venues), calculated us<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
market value approach.<br />
The estimated value <strong>of</strong> club volunteer labour not already <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> estimate<br />
<strong>of</strong> direct, <strong>in</strong>-k<strong>in</strong>d contributions.<br />
IPART considers that <strong>in</strong>direct social contributions are much harder to identify and<br />
value quantitatively. Therefore, <strong>the</strong>se contributions should be identified and<br />
recorded us<strong>in</strong>g a qualitative approach.<br />
The follow<strong>in</strong>g sections discuss each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se components <strong>in</strong> more detail, and expla<strong>in</strong><br />
how IPART applied its preferred approach <strong>in</strong> estimat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> clubs<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry’s direct social contributions for 2007.<br />
70 Wayne Sampson submission, 30 July 2007, p 5; Responsible Gam<strong>in</strong>g Fund Trustees submission,<br />
27 July 2007, p 3.<br />
<strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Registered</strong> <strong>Clubs</strong> <strong>Industry</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>NSW</strong> IPART 69