05.03.2014 Views

Review of the Registered Clubs Industry in NSW - Clubs NSW

Review of the Registered Clubs Industry in NSW - Clubs NSW

Review of the Registered Clubs Industry in NSW - Clubs NSW

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5 Ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Community Development and Support<br />

Expenditure Scheme<br />

IPART believes a market price measure can avoid <strong>the</strong> current confusion experienced<br />

by <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry. It will establish a clear, consistent and objective approach through<br />

its simple, straightforward application <strong>of</strong> easily understood and observed values.<br />

Surplus revenue fund<strong>in</strong>g and avoided cost are more complicated and require a<br />

subjective assessment <strong>of</strong> cash flows and <strong>the</strong> costs clubs <strong>in</strong>cur.<br />

IPART considers that <strong>the</strong> CDSE Scheme guidel<strong>in</strong>es should be amended to replace <strong>the</strong><br />

reference to actual cost with market value. Additionally, <strong>the</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>es should be<br />

enhanced to <strong>in</strong>clude a more comprehensive explanation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>-k<strong>in</strong>d valuation<br />

process, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g examples <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>-k<strong>in</strong>d CDSE valuations.<br />

Recommendation<br />

10 That <strong>the</strong> CDSE Scheme guidel<strong>in</strong>es be amended to:<br />

– advise that a market value approach should be used to value <strong>the</strong> provision <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>-k<strong>in</strong>d<br />

CDSE<br />

– <strong>in</strong>clude a more comprehensive explanation <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>-k<strong>in</strong>d valuation.<br />

5.5 Improv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> way clubs report <strong>the</strong>ir social contributions<br />

Document<strong>in</strong>g and report<strong>in</strong>g on club social contributions would make <strong>the</strong> task <strong>of</strong><br />

identify<strong>in</strong>g and measur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> contributions that clubs make to <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

communities easier. 82<br />

A mandatory report<strong>in</strong>g framework would require all clubs to record, report and<br />

potentially measure <strong>the</strong> social contributions <strong>the</strong>y make <strong>in</strong> communities. A<br />

mandatory report<strong>in</strong>g framework was proposed by NCOSS at <strong>the</strong> second Sydney<br />

roundtable. 83 However, such an obligation would impose a significant additional<br />

burden on <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry (<strong>in</strong> particular for smaller clubs). Some case study clubs 84<br />

noted <strong>the</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istrative burden measur<strong>in</strong>g and record<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>volves and/or <strong>the</strong><br />

difficulties associated with <strong>the</strong> valuation <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>-k<strong>in</strong>d contributions.<br />

The benefit provided by mandatory report<strong>in</strong>g thus needs to be balanced aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong><br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istrative and procedural burden it would create for clubs. While a mandatory<br />

report<strong>in</strong>g framework would conceivably be acceptable for <strong>the</strong> largest, strongly<br />

managed clubs with multiple layers <strong>of</strong> management, smaller clubs may not have <strong>the</strong><br />

necessary resources to perform this task.<br />

82 Outside CDSE requirements, clubs traditionally do not measure <strong>in</strong>-k<strong>in</strong>d contributions. However,<br />

some clubs have begun to record and value <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

83 NCOSS, Sydney roundtable, 7 May 2008, p 43.<br />

84 For example Asquith Bowl<strong>in</strong>g and Recreation Club, Club Old Bar and Riverstone-Sch<strong>of</strong>ields<br />

Memorial Club.<br />

<strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Registered</strong> <strong>Clubs</strong> <strong>Industry</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>NSW</strong> IPART 83

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!