05.03.2014 Views

Review of the Registered Clubs Industry in NSW - Clubs NSW

Review of the Registered Clubs Industry in NSW - Clubs NSW

Review of the Registered Clubs Industry in NSW - Clubs NSW

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

11 Mak<strong>in</strong>g it easier for clubs to amalgamate<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r possibility is to see amalgamation as a strategic move that can preserve a<br />

club’s identity and thus long-term viability through amalgamation with a larger,<br />

stronger club. For <strong>the</strong> parent club <strong>in</strong> this situation, amalgamation can br<strong>in</strong>g<br />

expansion opportunities, a greater range <strong>of</strong> facilities (such as bowl<strong>in</strong>g greens and golf<br />

courses) to <strong>of</strong>fer members and a degree <strong>of</strong> ’brand-build<strong>in</strong>g‘. This approach is<br />

perhaps exemplified by <strong>the</strong> Penrith Rugby League Club’s strategy <strong>of</strong> expansion by<br />

amalgamation, which it embarked on dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1990s. 198 Penrith Rugby League<br />

Club (now Pan<strong>the</strong>rs Enterta<strong>in</strong>ment Group) was <strong>the</strong> first club to engage <strong>in</strong><br />

amalgamations with clubs well outside its own geographic area.<br />

Government views on <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> amalgamation seem to have changed <strong>in</strong> recent<br />

years. For example, <strong>in</strong> 2001, provisions plac<strong>in</strong>g restrictions on amalgamations were<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Registered</strong> <strong>Clubs</strong> Act. 199 These provisions:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

limited <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> amalgamations per club to four<br />

required clubs to first seek to amalgamate with clubs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same area, <strong>the</strong>n with<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rs with <strong>the</strong> same objects if none <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same area were will<strong>in</strong>g to amalgamate<br />

prevented a parent club from dispos<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dissolved club’s assets for three<br />

years after amalgamation.<br />

IPART understands that <strong>the</strong>se amendments arose from concerns that amalgamation<br />

with geographically dispersed clubs was contrary to <strong>the</strong> community-based, local<br />

nature <strong>of</strong> clubs and that amalgamation could potentially be used as a strategy to strip<br />

assets (by transferr<strong>in</strong>g gam<strong>in</strong>g mach<strong>in</strong>e entitlements and sell<strong>in</strong>g property from <strong>the</strong><br />

dissolved clubs).<br />

However, <strong>the</strong>se restrictions were relaxed by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Registered</strong> <strong>Clubs</strong> Amendment Act 2006,<br />

on <strong>the</strong> basis that amalgamations are <strong>of</strong>ten a positive step to preserve community<br />

assets held by smaller clubs, and that larger, more pr<strong>of</strong>itable clubs that might be <strong>in</strong> a<br />

position to help smaller clubs were prevented from do<strong>in</strong>g so by <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

restrictions. 200<br />

Based on its consultations, IPART found that where a club cannot achieve f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

viability, no matter how good its f<strong>in</strong>ancial management is, amalgamation can<br />

provide a better alternative to closure, <strong>in</strong> that it can protect and preserve <strong>the</strong> club’s<br />

assets and <strong>the</strong>ir benefits to <strong>the</strong> community. In particular, IPART found that<br />

amalgamation can be <strong>of</strong> benefit to <strong>the</strong> community <strong>in</strong> areas where several clubs are<br />

struggl<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>ancially, and areas that are over-serviced by clubs.<br />

198 Department <strong>of</strong> Gam<strong>in</strong>g and Rac<strong>in</strong>g, Inquiry <strong>in</strong> relation to Penrith Rugby League Club Ltd, December<br />

2004, p 10.<br />

199 Via <strong>the</strong> Gam<strong>in</strong>g Mach<strong>in</strong>es Act.<br />

200 <strong>Registered</strong> <strong>Clubs</strong> Amendment Bill, second read<strong>in</strong>g speech, Mr Grant McBride, 14 November 2006.<br />

178 IPART <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Registered</strong> <strong>Clubs</strong> <strong>Industry</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>NSW</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!