Review of the Registered Clubs Industry in NSW - Clubs NSW
Review of the Registered Clubs Industry in NSW - Clubs NSW
Review of the Registered Clubs Industry in NSW - Clubs NSW
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
11 Mak<strong>in</strong>g it easier for clubs to amalgamate<br />
Ano<strong>the</strong>r possibility is to see amalgamation as a strategic move that can preserve a<br />
club’s identity and thus long-term viability through amalgamation with a larger,<br />
stronger club. For <strong>the</strong> parent club <strong>in</strong> this situation, amalgamation can br<strong>in</strong>g<br />
expansion opportunities, a greater range <strong>of</strong> facilities (such as bowl<strong>in</strong>g greens and golf<br />
courses) to <strong>of</strong>fer members and a degree <strong>of</strong> ’brand-build<strong>in</strong>g‘. This approach is<br />
perhaps exemplified by <strong>the</strong> Penrith Rugby League Club’s strategy <strong>of</strong> expansion by<br />
amalgamation, which it embarked on dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1990s. 198 Penrith Rugby League<br />
Club (now Pan<strong>the</strong>rs Enterta<strong>in</strong>ment Group) was <strong>the</strong> first club to engage <strong>in</strong><br />
amalgamations with clubs well outside its own geographic area.<br />
Government views on <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> amalgamation seem to have changed <strong>in</strong> recent<br />
years. For example, <strong>in</strong> 2001, provisions plac<strong>in</strong>g restrictions on amalgamations were<br />
<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Registered</strong> <strong>Clubs</strong> Act. 199 These provisions:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
limited <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> amalgamations per club to four<br />
required clubs to first seek to amalgamate with clubs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same area, <strong>the</strong>n with<br />
o<strong>the</strong>rs with <strong>the</strong> same objects if none <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same area were will<strong>in</strong>g to amalgamate<br />
prevented a parent club from dispos<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dissolved club’s assets for three<br />
years after amalgamation.<br />
IPART understands that <strong>the</strong>se amendments arose from concerns that amalgamation<br />
with geographically dispersed clubs was contrary to <strong>the</strong> community-based, local<br />
nature <strong>of</strong> clubs and that amalgamation could potentially be used as a strategy to strip<br />
assets (by transferr<strong>in</strong>g gam<strong>in</strong>g mach<strong>in</strong>e entitlements and sell<strong>in</strong>g property from <strong>the</strong><br />
dissolved clubs).<br />
However, <strong>the</strong>se restrictions were relaxed by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Registered</strong> <strong>Clubs</strong> Amendment Act 2006,<br />
on <strong>the</strong> basis that amalgamations are <strong>of</strong>ten a positive step to preserve community<br />
assets held by smaller clubs, and that larger, more pr<strong>of</strong>itable clubs that might be <strong>in</strong> a<br />
position to help smaller clubs were prevented from do<strong>in</strong>g so by <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />
restrictions. 200<br />
Based on its consultations, IPART found that where a club cannot achieve f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />
viability, no matter how good its f<strong>in</strong>ancial management is, amalgamation can<br />
provide a better alternative to closure, <strong>in</strong> that it can protect and preserve <strong>the</strong> club’s<br />
assets and <strong>the</strong>ir benefits to <strong>the</strong> community. In particular, IPART found that<br />
amalgamation can be <strong>of</strong> benefit to <strong>the</strong> community <strong>in</strong> areas where several clubs are<br />
struggl<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>ancially, and areas that are over-serviced by clubs.<br />
198 Department <strong>of</strong> Gam<strong>in</strong>g and Rac<strong>in</strong>g, Inquiry <strong>in</strong> relation to Penrith Rugby League Club Ltd, December<br />
2004, p 10.<br />
199 Via <strong>the</strong> Gam<strong>in</strong>g Mach<strong>in</strong>es Act.<br />
200 <strong>Registered</strong> <strong>Clubs</strong> Amendment Bill, second read<strong>in</strong>g speech, Mr Grant McBride, 14 November 2006.<br />
178 IPART <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Registered</strong> <strong>Clubs</strong> <strong>Industry</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>NSW</strong>