05.03.2014 Views

Review of the Registered Clubs Industry in NSW - Clubs NSW

Review of the Registered Clubs Industry in NSW - Clubs NSW

Review of the Registered Clubs Industry in NSW - Clubs NSW

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6 Streng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial viability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> registered<br />

clubs <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

<strong>Clubs</strong><strong>NSW</strong> highlighted that many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> clubs with gam<strong>in</strong>g mach<strong>in</strong>e revenue <strong>of</strong> less<br />

than $200,000 per annum considered to be marg<strong>in</strong>ally pr<strong>of</strong>itable or non-pr<strong>of</strong>itable <strong>in</strong><br />

2007 are bowls and golf clubs that provide a significant proportion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> recreational<br />

facilities <strong>in</strong> <strong>NSW</strong>.<br />

<strong>Clubs</strong> with gam<strong>in</strong>g mach<strong>in</strong>e revenue <strong>of</strong> between $5 million and $10 million appear to<br />

be experienc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> most f<strong>in</strong>ancial difficulty: 41.3 per cent <strong>of</strong> clubs <strong>in</strong> this size<br />

category were considered to be non-pr<strong>of</strong>itable or marg<strong>in</strong>ally pr<strong>of</strong>itable.<br />

However, IPART notes that <strong>Clubs</strong><strong>NSW</strong> used only a club’s Earn<strong>in</strong>gs Before Interest<br />

and Tax (EBIT) to determ<strong>in</strong>e its pr<strong>of</strong>itability. All clubs with a ratio <strong>of</strong> EBIT to total<br />

revenue <strong>of</strong> less than 0.1 per cent were deemed not pr<strong>of</strong>itable, while those with a ratio<br />

<strong>of</strong> between 0.1 per cent and 5 per cent were considered marg<strong>in</strong>ally pr<strong>of</strong>itable, and<br />

those with a ratio <strong>of</strong> greater than 5 per cent were considered pr<strong>of</strong>itable. As noted<br />

above, IPART considers that any one measure taken <strong>in</strong> isolation is not necessarily a<br />

good <strong>in</strong>dicator <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial viability. Never<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>Clubs</strong><strong>NSW</strong>’s analysis provides a<br />

rough guide to <strong>the</strong> potential level <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial vulnerability <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />

6.1.5 Individual clubs are prosper<strong>in</strong>g or decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g for a variety <strong>of</strong> reasons<br />

IPART exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> reasons why some clubs are prosper<strong>in</strong>g while o<strong>the</strong>rs are<br />

decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. It found that a range <strong>of</strong> factors can affect an <strong>in</strong>dividual club’s f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

viability, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Its reliance on gam<strong>in</strong>g mach<strong>in</strong>e revenue and vulnerability to regulatory change.<br />

Its level <strong>of</strong> volunteer support or ability to demand higher membership fees.<br />

The skills and effectiveness <strong>of</strong> its board and management.<br />

Its understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> its own f<strong>in</strong>ancial position.<br />

Its consideration <strong>of</strong> its long-term susta<strong>in</strong>ability and/or retention <strong>of</strong> community<br />

assets.<br />

The level <strong>of</strong> competition it faces.<br />

Demographic and socio-economic changes <strong>in</strong> its local area.<br />

IPART also found that few new clubs have been established <strong>in</strong> recent years. Each <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs is discussed below.<br />

Reliance on gam<strong>in</strong>g and vulnerability to regulatory change<br />

As discussed <strong>in</strong> section 6.1.1, IPART found that most clubs rely heavily on gam<strong>in</strong>g<br />

mach<strong>in</strong>e revenue. These clubs are particularly vulnerable to regulatory change that<br />

directly affects gam<strong>in</strong>g mach<strong>in</strong>e operations, such as <strong>the</strong> recent <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> gam<strong>in</strong>g<br />

mach<strong>in</strong>e tax rates and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> non-smok<strong>in</strong>g legislation.<br />

<strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Registered</strong> <strong>Clubs</strong> <strong>Industry</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>NSW</strong> IPART 97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!