Review of the Registered Clubs Industry in NSW - Clubs NSW
Review of the Registered Clubs Industry in NSW - Clubs NSW
Review of the Registered Clubs Industry in NSW - Clubs NSW
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
6 Streng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial viability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> registered<br />
clubs <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
<strong>Clubs</strong><strong>NSW</strong> highlighted that many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> clubs with gam<strong>in</strong>g mach<strong>in</strong>e revenue <strong>of</strong> less<br />
than $200,000 per annum considered to be marg<strong>in</strong>ally pr<strong>of</strong>itable or non-pr<strong>of</strong>itable <strong>in</strong><br />
2007 are bowls and golf clubs that provide a significant proportion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> recreational<br />
facilities <strong>in</strong> <strong>NSW</strong>.<br />
<strong>Clubs</strong> with gam<strong>in</strong>g mach<strong>in</strong>e revenue <strong>of</strong> between $5 million and $10 million appear to<br />
be experienc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> most f<strong>in</strong>ancial difficulty: 41.3 per cent <strong>of</strong> clubs <strong>in</strong> this size<br />
category were considered to be non-pr<strong>of</strong>itable or marg<strong>in</strong>ally pr<strong>of</strong>itable.<br />
However, IPART notes that <strong>Clubs</strong><strong>NSW</strong> used only a club’s Earn<strong>in</strong>gs Before Interest<br />
and Tax (EBIT) to determ<strong>in</strong>e its pr<strong>of</strong>itability. All clubs with a ratio <strong>of</strong> EBIT to total<br />
revenue <strong>of</strong> less than 0.1 per cent were deemed not pr<strong>of</strong>itable, while those with a ratio<br />
<strong>of</strong> between 0.1 per cent and 5 per cent were considered marg<strong>in</strong>ally pr<strong>of</strong>itable, and<br />
those with a ratio <strong>of</strong> greater than 5 per cent were considered pr<strong>of</strong>itable. As noted<br />
above, IPART considers that any one measure taken <strong>in</strong> isolation is not necessarily a<br />
good <strong>in</strong>dicator <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial viability. Never<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>Clubs</strong><strong>NSW</strong>’s analysis provides a<br />
rough guide to <strong>the</strong> potential level <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial vulnerability <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />
6.1.5 Individual clubs are prosper<strong>in</strong>g or decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g for a variety <strong>of</strong> reasons<br />
IPART exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> reasons why some clubs are prosper<strong>in</strong>g while o<strong>the</strong>rs are<br />
decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. It found that a range <strong>of</strong> factors can affect an <strong>in</strong>dividual club’s f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />
viability, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Its reliance on gam<strong>in</strong>g mach<strong>in</strong>e revenue and vulnerability to regulatory change.<br />
Its level <strong>of</strong> volunteer support or ability to demand higher membership fees.<br />
The skills and effectiveness <strong>of</strong> its board and management.<br />
Its understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> its own f<strong>in</strong>ancial position.<br />
Its consideration <strong>of</strong> its long-term susta<strong>in</strong>ability and/or retention <strong>of</strong> community<br />
assets.<br />
The level <strong>of</strong> competition it faces.<br />
Demographic and socio-economic changes <strong>in</strong> its local area.<br />
IPART also found that few new clubs have been established <strong>in</strong> recent years. Each <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong>se f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs is discussed below.<br />
Reliance on gam<strong>in</strong>g and vulnerability to regulatory change<br />
As discussed <strong>in</strong> section 6.1.1, IPART found that most clubs rely heavily on gam<strong>in</strong>g<br />
mach<strong>in</strong>e revenue. These clubs are particularly vulnerable to regulatory change that<br />
directly affects gam<strong>in</strong>g mach<strong>in</strong>e operations, such as <strong>the</strong> recent <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> gam<strong>in</strong>g<br />
mach<strong>in</strong>e tax rates and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> non-smok<strong>in</strong>g legislation.<br />
<strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Registered</strong> <strong>Clubs</strong> <strong>Industry</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>NSW</strong> IPART 97