2120 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

More documents

Recommendations

Info

THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF THE VARIOUS SYSTEMS TO KEEP LAYING HENSBox A1.8: Profile of Hedegaard FoodsHedegaard Foods accounts for 40% of all eggs packed in DenmarkOwnership: Hedegaard A/SSubsidiary: NoneTurnover: DKK 380 million, €50.9 million (2003)Profit: DKK 29 million, €3.9 million (2003)Employment: 112 (2003)Main markets: DomesticA1.3.2.2. Production (packer) concentrationThe Danish industry is concentrated with only around 300 commercial egg producers, of which 200account for three quarters of total production. The packing level is also very concentrated with just38 registered packers, of which two, Danæg and Hedegaard Foods dominate with more than 90%market share between them. These are followed by four packers who between them account for afurther 7.5% of market share. The remaining packers are very small scale in comparison.Table A1.12: Main egg packers in DenmarkRank Company Output 20031 Danæg A/S 408.0 million eggs (estimate)2 Hedegaard Foods 345.0 million eggs (estimate)3 Hønseriet Henriettelund 22.5 million eggs (estimate)4 Møllebjerggård Ægpakkeri 22.5 million eggs (estimate)5 Dueholm 11.0 million eggs (estimate)6 Flinterup 5.5 million eggs (estimate)Total productionNote: estimates are calculated from the mid-point of an estimated percentage range of market share.818.0 million eggsThe 4-firm concentration ratio for Danish egg packers is therefore high at 97.6%. It is not possibleto calculate the 8-firm concentration ratio accurately, but assuming the remaining packers are all thesame size it will be around 99.6%. At least three mid-sized egg packing companies have ceased toexist since 1995 (what was at the time the third largest company was taken over by HedegaardFoods in 2002, the other two were acquired by Danæg). The egg packing sector has thereforebecome more concentrated over time.A1.3.2.3. Main production systemsJust over half (56.5%) of Danish commercial egg production takes place in traditional cages. Theremaining production is dominated by deep litter and organic systems accounting for 20.4% and14.1% of egg production respectively in 2003. Just over half (56.9%) of eggs sold in the retail sectorare from caged hens with 19.9% from barn systems, 14.8% from organic and 8.5% from free rangesystems see Figure A1.12in Section A1.3.5.1. Despite the dominance of the caged system, the Co-op,accounting for one third of the Danish retail market, <strong>report</strong>s that 31% of the value of egg sales is130
THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF THE VARIOUS SYSTEMS TO KEEP LAYING HENSderived from barn eggs, 30% from organic, 22% from cages and the balance from free range,reflecting the impact of differential prices 50 .The technical definitions of the systems in use differ somewhat in Denmark from the minimum EUlegislation and Danish research suggests that the cost of the added national animal welfare adds 3.62Euro cents/kg 51 (around 5%) to the production of caged eggs 52 .The differences in the systems as operated in Denmark compared to the EU legislation are asfollows:Traditional cages only 18 hens are permitted per square metre of floor space which means that only 3 tiers ofcages are allowed (6 tiers are standard in many Member States giving a greater number ofbirds per area of floor space); Danish legislation allows for 600cm 2 per bird compared to 550cm 2 at the EU level (this wasalso the case when the EU minimum requirement was 450cm 2 and took effect from 1979when cages were introduced); a maximum of 6 birds per cage is permitted; light and ventilation must be ‘sufficient’ and there must be an alarm if the power fails; and<strong>final</strong>ly, cage floors must slope by no more than 12 degrees compared to 14 degrees under EUlegislation.Deep litter In aviary systems (in the spring of 2004 accounting for less than 1% of laying hens in Denmark)only 3 levels are permitted where the Directive permits 4 levels.Free range Popholes are required to be at least 50 x 50 cm compared to the Directive’s 35 x 40 cm.Enriched cages Only one system has been approved to date in Denmark and there is at present (May 2004) anon-going national discussion over certain aspects including drinking facilities. The Danishgovernment has stipulated one water nipple for every two birds. This is likely to causeproblems of wet floors and may have a negative impact on animal welfare. It is also physicallydifficult to fit the necessary number of water nipples into a cage.The evolution of use of the different production systems in Denmark is presented in Table A1. 13and Figure A1.9 below. This shows both the steady growth in the use of alternative systems and thefairly steep decline in the use of the caged system from 1994 (possibly linked to the provision ofnational subsidies for investing in alternative systems, see below).50 It should be stated that the Co-op does not stock eggs from caged hens in all its stores due to the exceedingly low demand in thegreater Copenhagen area.51 27DKK at DKK = €0.134.52 This only accounts for the limit to three tiers rather than the standard six. Source: Dansk Erhvervsfjerkrae.131
Page 1:
Study on thesocio-economic implicat
Page 4 and 5:
THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89: THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF
Page 92 and 93: THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSA1.
Page 203 and 204:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSwhi
Page 205 and 206:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTS3.0
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSTab
Page 211 and 212:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTS765
Page 213 and 214:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTS80%
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSwhe
Page 219 and 220:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSThe
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTS60%
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSAll
Page 235 and 236:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTS60,
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268 and 269:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSsta
Page 270 and 271:
Page 272 and 273:
Page 274 and 275:
Page 276 and 277:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSBox
Page 278 and 279:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSAt
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303:
Page 306 and 307:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSAlt
Page 308 and 309:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSpro
Page 310 and 311:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSCag
Page 312 and 313:
Page 314 and 315:
Page 316 and 317:
Page 318 and 319:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSwel
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTS St
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSupw
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSsup
Page 337 and 338:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTS4,5
Page 339 and 340:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSWhi
Page 341 and 342:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSApp
Page 343 and 344:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSBot
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSAnn
Page 351 and 352:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSYEA
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361:
Page 364 and 365:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIESA2.3.2.
Page 366 and 367:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIESTable A2
Page 368 and 369:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIESA2.3.2.2
Page 370 and 371:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIESA2.3.3.
Page 373 and 374:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIESA2.4. Un
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIESPrior to
Page 379 and 380:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIES35030025
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIESStandard
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIESUnder th
Page 389 and 390:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIES2303.33.
Page 391 and 392:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIES70605040
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIEStwo-thir
Page 397 and 398:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIES(85% of
Page 399:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIESAnnex A:
Page 402 and 403:
Page 404 and 405:
Page 406 and 407:
Page 408 and 409:
Page 410 and 411:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIESevaluate
Page 412 and 413:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIESsmaller
Page 414 and 415:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIESInputsFe
Page 416 and 417:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIESN Qc N Q
Page 418 and 419:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIES(10*) EQ
Page 420 and 421:
Page 422 and 423:
Page 424 and 425:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIESFor a ch
Page 426 and 427:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIESHoloway,
Page 428 and 429:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIESA3.6. Se
show all

2120 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?