2120 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

More documents

Recommendations

Info

APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSTable A1.76: Research resultsTraditionalcage(450 cm²)Traditional cage(550 cm²)Scenario1Scenario2Enriched cage(750 cm²)Scenario1Scenario2Barn(Perchery)(1,110 cm²)Scenario1Scenario2Barn(DeepLitter)(1,110cm²)Second grade eggs Base +2% Equal +5% -2% +2% Equal EqualEgg production Base -5 Equal -15 Equal -10 Equal -6Feed conversion ratio 1 Base +0.20 +0.05 +0.20 +0.05 +0.20 +0.05 +0.15Mortality Base +2% Equal +5% +2% +5% +2% +0.5%Production costs(euro/kg eggs) 0.75 0.82 0.79 0.89 0.86 0.92 0.88 0.96Note:1 Feed conversion ration +0.10 or more: feeding price 0.45 euro/100 kg cheaper.Source: Animal Sciences Group, Applied Research Division, posterpresentation Effects of welfare aspects to cost price for table eggs,Bremen, Germany, 2002.The results show that in comparison to traditional cages (450 cm², beak trimmed hens): Production costs in traditional cages with 550 cm² and no beak trimmed hens increased by 4-8%. In enriched cages the costs increased by 12-17%. In Barn (Perchery) the costs increased by 16-21%. In Barn (Deep Litter) the costs increased by 27%.In conclusion the report states that the increase in production costs for higher animal welfare liessomewhere between 4 and 21 Euro cents (equivalent to 4% and 27% of total production costs),depending on the system used and the scenario. The higher space allowance leads to higher housingcosts of 3-8 Euro cents/kg, higher feeding costs of 1-5 Euro cents/kg and higher labour costs of 0-5Euro cents/kg. Ending beak trimming is, according to this report, likely to lead to higher feedingcosts of 1-3 Euro cents/kg.The Agricultural Economics Research Institute (LEI) has also published calculations relating to theincreasing cost of egg production as a result of animal welfare improvements. They state that thecost price (including labour) of eggs from caged hens (450 cm²) in the Netherlands was 71 Euro centsper kg, or 52.8 Euro cents per dozen eggs. The authors estimate that the cost of egg production willincrease by 8% (5.6 Euro cent per kg egg) between 2000 and 2005 as a result of the increase in spaceallowance per hen, a ban on beak trimming, salmonella controls, the ban on the use of meat andbone meal, reduction of ammonia emissions and the introduction of an energy tax on electricity.The difference in cost resulting from the increase in space allowance alone is estimated to be 4%.246
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSA1.10.2.5. Gross marginsAdding egg and spent hen revenue to the variable cost data in the previous section allows thecalculation of producer gross margin Table A1.77. This shows that the additional revenue availablefrom both eggs and the spent hen more than compensate for the higher variable costs leading tohigher gross margins in the alternative systems.Table A1.77: Egg producer gross margin per kg (2003) in Euro centsTraditional cages Barn Free range OrganicEgg returns 71.98 86.38 99.98 172.76Revenue from spent hens 1.49 1.82 1.90 3.50Output (per year) 73.47 88.20 101.88 176.26Total variable costs 58.55 66.87 71.15 132.62Gross margin 14.92 21.33 30.73 43.64Source: ASG-publication: KWIN-V 2003-2004 and Agra CEAS Consulting calculations.A1.10.3. Egg processingThere were 17 egg processing companies active in the Netherlands in 2002 using a total of 2.295billion eggs. Table A1.78 shows that there has been a significant amount of concentration in thesector since 2000 with the loss of 6 companies. Despite this, the number of eggs supplied to theindustry was broadly similar in 2000 and 2002 suggesting that existing companies were increasing inscale. Production of egg products was 42% higher in 2003 than in 1992.Table A1.78: Number of firms in the egg processing industry and their production 1992-2003Volume of eggs bought-in annually: 1992 2000 2002 2003< 625,000 kg 5625,000-10,000,000 kg 3>10,000,000 kg 9Total number of firms n.a. 23 18 17Total number of eggs supplied to industry, excluding imports (‘000 tons eggs) 103.9 144.2 142.3 n.a.Production of egg products (‘000 tons liquid egg equivalent) 103.8 133.1 127.4 147.0 (1)Note:Total production in 2002 is provisional.Source: PVE-publication: Vee, vlees en eieren in cijfers, various years.A1.10.3.1. Processor concentrationThe Dutch processing sector is very concentrated with just 17 companies in 2003. These are listedalphabetically in Table A1.79 with their share of production in 2001, the latest available year. TheTable also shows the 4-firm concentration ratio (82%) and the 8-firm concentration ratio (98%).247
Page 1:
Study on thesocio-economic implicat
Page 4 and 5:
THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSA1.
Page 203 and 204:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSwhi
Page 205 and 206: APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTS3.0
Page 207 and 208: APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSA1.
Page 209 and 210: APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSTab
Page 211 and 212: APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTS765
Page 213 and 214: APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTS80%
Page 217 and 218: APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSwhe
Page 219 and 220: APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSThe
Page 227 and 228: APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTS60%
Page 233 and 234: APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSAll
Page 235 and 236: APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTS60,
Page 241: APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSA1.
Page 268 and 269: APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSsta
Page 276 and 277: APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSBox
Page 295 and 296: APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSAt
Page 303: APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSA1.
Page 306 and 307:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSAlt
Page 308 and 309:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSpro
Page 310 and 311:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSCag
Page 312 and 313:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSTab
Page 314 and 315:
Page 316 and 317:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTS160
Page 318 and 319:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSwel
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTS St
Page 329 and 330:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSThe
Page 331 and 332:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSupw
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSsup
Page 337 and 338:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTS4,5
Page 339 and 340:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSWhi
Page 341 and 342:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSApp
Page 343 and 344:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSBot
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSAnn
Page 351 and 352:
APPENDIX 1: MEMBER STATE REPORTSYEA
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361:
Page 364 and 365:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIESA2.3.2.
Page 366 and 367:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIESTable A2
Page 368 and 369:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIESA2.3.2.2
Page 370 and 371:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIESA2.3.3.
Page 373 and 374:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIESA2.4. Un
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIESPrior to
Page 379 and 380:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIES35030025
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIESStandard
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIESUnder th
Page 389 and 390:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIES2303.33.
Page 391 and 392:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIES70605040
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIEStwo-thir
Page 397 and 398:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIES(85% of
Page 399:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIESAnnex A:
Page 402 and 403:
Page 404 and 405:
Page 406 and 407:
Page 408 and 409:
Page 410 and 411:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIESevaluate
Page 412 and 413:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIESsmaller
Page 414 and 415:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIESInputsFe
Page 416 and 417:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIESN Qc N Q
Page 418 and 419:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIES(10*) EQ
Page 420 and 421:
Page 422 and 423:
Page 424 and 425:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIESFor a ch
Page 426 and 427:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIESHoloway,
Page 428 and 429:
APPENDIX 2: THIRD COUNTRIESA3.6. Se
show all

2120 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?