16.12.2012 Views

Liquid Culture Systems for in vitro Plant Propagation

Liquid Culture Systems for in vitro Plant Propagation

Liquid Culture Systems for in vitro Plant Propagation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

170 M. Berthouly & H. Etienne<br />

2.3 <strong>Systems</strong> with partial immersion and a liquid medium<br />

renewal mechanism<br />

The plant explant is always positioned on a culture support (agar<br />

medium, propylene screen, cellulose plugs). <strong>Liquid</strong> culture medium is<br />

frequently supplied, then withdrawn <strong>in</strong>to a dra<strong>in</strong>-off recipient vessel, so as to<br />

imbibe the support, stabilize the composition of the culture medium and<br />

extend the duration of subcultures, whilst avoid<strong>in</strong>g or postpon<strong>in</strong>g the need to<br />

change the medium. Only the base of the plant material is partially<br />

immersed. Two models have been published:<br />

– Aitken-Christie and Jones (1987) and Aitken-Christie and Davies (1988)<br />

proposed a semi�automatic process <strong>in</strong> large polycarbonate conta<strong>in</strong>ers<br />

measur<strong>in</strong>g 250 x 390 x 120mm (Figure 1B). In their system, P<strong>in</strong>us shoots<br />

were grown on an agar medium, with automatic addition and withdrawal<br />

of liquid medium by peristaltic pumps on a periodic basis. The liquid<br />

from the fresh medium recipient vessel came <strong>in</strong>to contact with the<br />

explants <strong>for</strong> 4 to 6 hours, us<strong>in</strong>g a vacuum suction system, then went to<br />

the dra<strong>in</strong>-off recipient vessel. This system follows on from the work by<br />

Maene and Debergh (1987), who had shown the positive effects of a<br />

add<strong>in</strong>g liquid nutrient medium or aux<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong> <strong>vitro</strong> stages.<br />

– Simonton et al. (1991): their system featured a computer-controlled<br />

pump<strong>in</strong>g apparatus that <strong>in</strong>termittently supplied liquid medium to plants<br />

cultured <strong>in</strong> 7-litre vessels (Figure 1C). <strong>Plant</strong> material rested on a<br />

per<strong>for</strong>ated polypropylene screen that was attached to the <strong>in</strong>side of the<br />

vessel. Control capabilities <strong>in</strong>cluded medium <strong>in</strong>troduction and depth<br />

regulation with<strong>in</strong> four <strong>in</strong>dividual culture vessels, medium cycl<strong>in</strong>g on an<br />

assigned schedule, schedule adjustment dur<strong>in</strong>g a culture period, and<br />

medium replacement.<br />

2.4 <strong>Systems</strong> with complete immersion by pneumatic driven<br />

transfer of liquid medium and without medium replenishment<br />

Different systems were described after the first publication by Alvard<br />

et al. (1993). These <strong>in</strong>clude the most recent temporary immersion systems.<br />

They are simple and easy to use. They enable contact between all parts of the<br />

explant and the liquid medium, along with complete renewal of the culture<br />

atmosphere by <strong>for</strong>ced ventilation, which drives the liquid towards the plant<br />

material. The plant material can be placed <strong>in</strong> the conta<strong>in</strong>er <strong>in</strong> bulk, remov<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the need to position the plant material on a support. Such systems <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

pneumatic transfer of the medium from a reservoir tank to the conta<strong>in</strong>er<br />

hold<strong>in</strong>g the plants. To avoid excess tub<strong>in</strong>g, these two compartments are

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!