16.12.2012 Views

Liquid Culture Systems for in vitro Plant Propagation

Liquid Culture Systems for in vitro Plant Propagation

Liquid Culture Systems for in vitro Plant Propagation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

198 Elio Jiménez González<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Commercial <strong>in</strong> <strong>vitro</strong> propagation is currently applied to several tropical<br />

plants. Among food crops bananas, planta<strong>in</strong>s, sugarcane and p<strong>in</strong>eapples are<br />

the most successful examples. However, <strong>in</strong> <strong>vitro</strong> propagation methods are<br />

available <strong>for</strong> a large number of other tropical plants, which are normally<br />

used on a laboratory scale <strong>for</strong> research purposes, germplasm preservation or<br />

propagation of selected plants <strong>in</strong> research or academic <strong>in</strong>stitutions.<br />

The present limitation to the wider commercial application of<br />

micropropagation <strong>in</strong> tropical crops <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countries is the high cost of<br />

the plants when us<strong>in</strong>g the traditional micropropagation methods, e.g.<br />

bananas and planta<strong>in</strong>s (0.15 – 0.30 USD), sugarcane (0.12 – 0.20 USD),<br />

p<strong>in</strong>eapple (0.10 – 0.25 USD) (Pérez et al, 1998).<br />

Labour costs <strong>in</strong> Lat<strong>in</strong> America are lower compared to developed<br />

countries <strong>in</strong> North America, Europe or Asia, but still rema<strong>in</strong> as the major<br />

part of propagation costs. Manual labor <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>vitro</strong> propagated plants <strong>in</strong><br />

Lat<strong>in</strong> America represents from 45 – 60 % of total costs (Pérez et al., 1998).<br />

Partial automation of <strong>in</strong> <strong>vitro</strong> propagation and especially temporary<br />

immersion systems (TIS) may help to reduce propagation costs (Etienne and<br />

Berthouly, 2002). TIS can <strong>in</strong>crease the efficiency of propagation processes<br />

by reduc<strong>in</strong>g the cost as a result of labour reduction, sav<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> shelf space,<br />

high biological yields, improved plant quality or low <strong>in</strong>vestment and<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>tenance costs. For p<strong>in</strong>eapple shoot multiplication the application of TIS<br />

resulted <strong>in</strong> 20 % cost reduction compared to cultures <strong>in</strong> conventional liquid<br />

medium (Escalona et al., 1999) and sugarcane propagation <strong>in</strong> TIS saved 46<br />

% of the costs <strong>in</strong> comparison with the standard procedure <strong>in</strong> semisolid<br />

medium (Lorenzo et al., 1998).<br />

2. TIS from laboratory to commercial application<br />

TIS have been described <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>vitro</strong> multiplication of a wide range of<br />

tropical crops such as Ananas comosus, Camellia s<strong>in</strong>ensis, Citrus deliciosa,<br />

Coffea s.p, Colocasia sp., Eucalyptus sp., Hevea brasiliensis, Manihot<br />

esculenta, Musa sp., Psidium guajava, Saccharum sp., Solanum tuberosum<br />

(Table 1). Laboratory protocols have been developed by us<strong>in</strong>g different<br />

regeneration systems: Shoot multiplication, somatic embryos (either<br />

multiplication and/or germ<strong>in</strong>ation) and <strong>in</strong>duction of storage organs<br />

(microtubers).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!