23.12.2012 Views

european college of sport science

european college of sport science

european college of sport science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Wednesday, June 24th, 2009<br />

THE EFFECT OF BICARBONATE INFUSION IN CEREBRAL METABOLISM DURING MAXIMAL EXERCISE<br />

VOLIANITIS, S., RASMUSSEN, P., SEIFERT, T., SECHER, N.H.<br />

AALBORG UNIVERSITY<br />

Exercise lowers the cerebral metabolic ratio <strong>of</strong> O2 to carbohydrates (glucose + ½ lactate). Metabolic acidosis increases cerebral lactate<br />

uptake and exacerbates the cerebral metabolic ratio in vitro. However, the influence <strong>of</strong> pH on cerebral lactate uptake and the cerebral<br />

metabolic ratio during exercise in humans is not known.<br />

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence <strong>of</strong> pH on cerebral metabolism during maximal exercise. METHODS: Sodium bicarbonate (Bic, 1 M;<br />

350-500 ml) or an equal volume <strong>of</strong> saline (Sal; 1 M) was infused intravenously at a constant rate during a ’2,000-m’ maximal ergometer<br />

row in six male oarsmen (23 ± 2 yrs). Comparisons between the two conditions were made using two-way ANOVA with repeated measures.<br />

RESULTS: During the Sal trial, pH decreased from 7.41 ± 0.01 at rest to 7.02 ± 0.02 but only to 7.36 ± 0.02 (P < 0.05) during the Bic<br />

trial. Arterial lactate increased to 21.4 ± 0.8 mM (mean ± SEM) and 32.7 ± 2.3 mM during the Sal and Bic trials, respectively. The arterialjugular<br />

venous (a-v) lactate difference increased from -0.03 ± 0.01 mM at rest to 3.2 ± 0.9 mM (P < 0.05) and 3.4 ± 1.4 mM (P < 0.05)<br />

following the Sal and Bic trials, respectively. The cerebral metabolic ratio decreased equally during the Sal and Bic trials from 5.8 ± 0.6 at<br />

rest to 1.7 ± 0.1 and 1.8 ± 0.2, respectively.<br />

CONCLUSION: The enlarged blood-buffering capacity after infusion <strong>of</strong> Bic attenuated the metabolic acidosis but did not affect the cerebral<br />

lactate uptake or the cerebral metabolic ratio during maximal exercise.<br />

EFFECTS OF PRIOR EXHAUSTIVE LEG OR ARM EXERCISE ON SUBSEQUENT PERFORMANCE, POWER AND EMG ACTIVITY<br />

IN A DIFFERENT MUSCLE GROUP<br />

GABE BELTRAMI, F., DE GROOT, R., RAUCH, L., TUCKER, R., RAE, D.E., NOAKES, T.D.<br />

UNIVERSITY OF CAPETOWN<br />

Introduction: A prior bout <strong>of</strong> exhaustive exercise is known to result in early exhaustion being reached during a subsequent bout <strong>of</strong> maximal<br />

exercise. Much <strong>of</strong> the research to date has examined peripheral factors for this phenomenon. Therefore, the aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to<br />

investigate the contribution <strong>of</strong> central regulation on the performance <strong>of</strong> maximal exercise preceded by a bout <strong>of</strong> exhaustive exercise<br />

using a different muscle group.<br />

Methods: Ten healthy men (5 well-trained cyclists and 5 well-trained canoeists) were recruited for this study and all completed two exercise<br />

trials. In trial 1, subjects performed an incremental leg ergometry test to exhaustion (LEG A), followed 15 minutes later by an incremental<br />

arm ergometry test to exhaustion (ARM B). In trial 2, the order was reversed (ARM A followed 15 minutes later by LEG B). The two<br />

trials were separated by at least 3 days and the order in which the subjects performed the trials was randomised. Time to exhaustion (TE),<br />

power output (PO), heart rate (HR), rating <strong>of</strong> perceived exertion (RPE), oxygen consumption (VO2), ventilation rate (VE), plasma lactate (LA)<br />

and electromyography (EMG) <strong>of</strong> two lower (rectus femoris and vastus lateralis) and two upper limb (triceps and biceps) muscles were<br />

measured during all trials.<br />

Results: During the A trials, subjects reached exhaustion faster and at a higher PO during legs compared to arms. While HR and RPE<br />

were similar in the leg and arm tests at exhaustion, VO2 (p = 0.018) and VE (p = 0.008) were lower in the arm test. Performance during<br />

ARM B was unaffected by prior LEG A. However, prior ARM A significantly reduced TE (p = 0.011) and peak PO (p = 0.011) during subsequent<br />

LEG B. There were no changes in maximal VO2, HR, RPE, VE and LA between trials A and B <strong>of</strong> each muscle group. LA was higher at<br />

the beginning <strong>of</strong> LEG B (p < 0.001) and ARM B (p = 0.001) exercise compared to their respective A trials. Prior LEG A affected subsequent<br />

ARM B HR for the first 40% <strong>of</strong> the trial. During LEG B, however, HR differed only at the start and 20% <strong>of</strong> the test. EMG increased linearly<br />

during all the trials and maximal EMG activity measured during the tests was only 55% <strong>of</strong> previous MVC. RPE rose linearly during all tests,<br />

regardless <strong>of</strong> different levels <strong>of</strong> LA and HR. None <strong>of</strong> the measured physiological/neuromuscular variables measured showed a plateau at<br />

exhaustion.<br />

Conclusion: Prior arm exercise reduced peak power output during a subsequent bout <strong>of</strong> exhaustive leg exercise without altering the<br />

physiological or EMG variables measured in this study. In contrast, prior leg exercise did not alter peak power output during subsequent<br />

arm exercise. These results suggest that during the tests RPE was set in anticipation, being independent <strong>of</strong> the amount <strong>of</strong> muscle mass<br />

activated, HR or LA. These data are difficult to interpret according to traditional peripheral models <strong>of</strong> exercise fatigue and deserves further<br />

investigations.<br />

IMPACT OF TRAINING STATUS ON MAXIMAL OXYGEN UPTAKE CRITERIA ATTAINMENT DURING CYCLING<br />

CHRISTIE, C.<br />

RHODES UNIVERSITY<br />

Objectives: The aims <strong>of</strong> this study were to assess whether training status influenced maximal physiological and perceptual responses<br />

and whether certain maximal criteria were more sensitive for individuals with different levels <strong>of</strong> training. Methods: Females who were<br />

either trained (N = 10) or untrained (N = 10) underwent a maximal cycle ergometer test to assess whether the criteria to indicate VO2 max<br />

were training-specific. Results: Expectedly, VO2 max was significantly higher in the trained (50.09 mlO2.kg-1.min-1) compared to the<br />

untrained group (35.21 mlO2.kg-1.min-1) while the oxygen uptake plateau criterion was met by only 40% <strong>of</strong> the participants. Peak workload<br />

(W) was significantly higher (234 W compared to 174 W) and total test time significantly longer (7 minutes compared to 5 minutes) in<br />

the trained group. Peak lactate values did not reach maximal criteria and on completion <strong>of</strong> the test were not significantly different between<br />

the groups (7.8 mmol.L-1 in the trained group and 8.1 mmol.L-1 in the untrained group). Likewise, maximal heart rates, respiratory<br />

exchange ratio (RER) values and ratings <strong>of</strong> perceived effort were not different between the groups. Noteworthy is that none <strong>of</strong> the subjects<br />

achieved all <strong>of</strong> the criteria indicating a maximal effort. The criteria most achieved in both samples were RPEmax and RERmax with the<br />

latter being the most attained in the untrained group and RPEmax being mostly attained by the trained group. Conclusions: The criteria<br />

used to indicate attainment <strong>of</strong> VO2 max may be limited and may differ when comparing a heterogeneous training sample. Although<br />

VO2 max was significantly higher in the trained group, all the other responses were similar. However, the number <strong>of</strong> trained and untrained<br />

subjects reaching particular criteria was different suggesting that certain criteria may be more sensitive for individuals with different<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> training.<br />

OSLO/NORWAY, JUNE 24-27, 2009 101

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!