european college of sport science
european college of sport science
european college of sport science
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Saturday, June 27th, 2009<br />
between visual acuity and game performance in water polo is undocumented. Thus the present study focuses on the effect <strong>of</strong> corrected<br />
visual acuity in game performance during water polo play.<br />
Methods: Five male water polo players (age: 18.0±3.4 yrs) participated in the study. The participants played games in two conditions; in<br />
the first game the players were using contact lenses and in the second game they were not. Their corrected visual acuity with contact<br />
lenses was between 0.8 and 1.0. The uncorrected visual acuity <strong>of</strong> players was 0.01 and 0.1. The indicators <strong>of</strong> game performance were (1)<br />
the rate <strong>of</strong> errors; (2) the rate <strong>of</strong> contributed play; and (3) the rate <strong>of</strong> ball contacts. The indicators <strong>of</strong> errors and contributed plays followed<br />
the results reported by Enomoto et al. (2001). The participants completed self-evaluations regarding their play.<br />
Results: The results showed the significant difference in the rate <strong>of</strong> errors committed by players with corrected visual acuity using contact<br />
lenses and those with uncorrected visual acuity. According to their responses <strong>of</strong> questionnaire, there was a significant difference in<br />
aspects <strong>of</strong> the game related to vision between players with corrected visual acuity and those with uncorrected visual acuity. For example,<br />
players felt that they could more clearly see their opponents, the goal, and the ball movements in corrected visual acuity conditions as<br />
compared with those playing in uncorrected visual acuity condition.<br />
Conclusion: These findings showed that corrected visual acuity using contact lenses led to a decrease in errors committed; clear vision<br />
during games led to significant improvements in game performance. In conclusion, the study suggested the corrected visual acuity is an<br />
important factor in scoring and winning.<br />
References<br />
Komori Y., Kono I., Tsukuda F., Saito M., Sakata I., and Kono K. (1998) Wearing contact lens might prevent corneal damages and keep<br />
visual functions during water polo play. Med Sci <strong>sport</strong>s exerc, 30, s157.<br />
Enomoto I., Minami T., Takahashi M., Takahashi J., Suga M., and Komori Y. (2001) Game analysis <strong>of</strong> team contribution for water polo<br />
player. Jpn J Sport Method, 14, 23-30.<br />
DEVELOPMENT OF BIA EQUATIONS FOR ESTIMATING BODY COMPOSITION OF ELITE MALE WRESTLERS<br />
KARLI, U., ACIKADA, C., ALPAR, R., HAZIR, T., DOGU, G.<br />
1. ABANT IZZET BAYSAL UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND SPORT, BOLU, TURKEY, 2. HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF<br />
SPORT SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY, AND FACULTY OF MEDICINE, ANKARA, TURKEY.<br />
Introduction: Body composition is associated with successful participating in elite wrestling. Although, BIA is relatively simple, quick,<br />
portable and noninvasive method for estimating body composition (Wagner and Heyward, 1999), use <strong>of</strong> inappropriate equations in BIA<br />
measurements can lead systematic prediction errors (Heyward and Stolarczyk, 1996). Therefore, the purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to develop<br />
bioelectrical impedance equations for estimating body composition (fat free mass) <strong>of</strong> elite male wrestlers.<br />
Methods: Hundred and eleven highly active elite male senior wrestlers (mean ± SD, age: 21.054±2.993yr, height (H): 171.852±7.518cm,<br />
body weight (BW): 78.362±15.931kg) were participated in this study as volunteers. H, BW, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and<br />
hydrostatic weighing (HW) measurements with residual volume were performed at least four hours after breakfast between 11:00 and<br />
13:00 o’clock. Each subjects resistance (R), reactance (Xc) and impedance (Z) values were recorded by BIA and fat free mass (FFM) was<br />
calculated by using the hydrostatic weighing (HW) measurements as the reference variable. Pearson Correlation Coefficient was used to<br />
measure the interrelationship between reference variable (FFM) and independent variables. Then, Multiple Linear Regression Analysis<br />
was performed using the FFM as the reference variable and other measured items as the explanatory variables in order to form prediction<br />
regression equations (EQ) for BIA. Finally, validity <strong>of</strong> the equations was examined with Cross Validation Method.<br />
Results: Five equations were derived for FFM to use in BIA measurements. The explanatory variables <strong>of</strong> the equations were BW, R, height<br />
squared (Hsqr), Xc, Z, resistance index (Hsqr/R) and impedance index (Hsqr/Z). The multiple coefficient <strong>of</strong> determination (R square= Rsqr)<br />
and standard error <strong>of</strong> estimate (SEE) <strong>of</strong> the equations are given as followed: Rsqr =0.98384, SEE =1.45821kg (EQ1); Rsqr =0.98375, SEE<br />
=1.46214kg (EQ2); Rsqr =0.98543, SEE =1.37370kg (EQ3); Rsqr =0.98533, SEE =1.37825kg (EQ4) and Rsqr =0.98613, SEE =1.36336kg (EQ5).<br />
By the use <strong>of</strong> Stepwise Linear Regression Analysis, the results <strong>of</strong> this study indicated that BW, R, Hsqr, and Xc as ideal explanatory variables<br />
to estimate FFM <strong>of</strong> elite male wrestlers in BIA measurements. Final prediction equation and its Rsqr and SEE are given as followed:<br />
FFM= 19.69292 + 0.5233 (BW) – 0.05256(R) + 0.00085(Hsqr) + 0.11211(Xc); Rsqr = 0.98613, SEE= 1.36336.<br />
Conclusion: Finally, cross validated prediction equations with high Rsqr and low SEE were derived for FFM <strong>of</strong> elite male wrestlers to use in<br />
BIA measurements. Population specific equations should be developed for accurate estimation <strong>of</strong> body composition in specific homogeneous<br />
groups.<br />
References<br />
Heyward VH, Stolarczyk LM (1996). Applied Body Composition Assessment, 54. Champaign, IL; Human Kinetics, USA<br />
Wagner DR, Heyward VH (1999). Res Q Exerc Sport, 70, 135-49.<br />
GAME PERFORMANCE AND ACTIVITY PROFILE OF WHEELCHAIR BASKETBALL PLAYERS<br />
YODA, T., YASUMATSU, M., KAWANISHI, M., ISHIWATA, T., TANAKA, H.<br />
1. DOKKYO UNIVERSITY (JAPAN), 2. RIKKYO UNIVERSITY (JAPAN), 3. YOKOHAMA NATIONAL UNIVERSITY (JAPAN)<br />
Introduction: The specific rule in wheelchair basketball is the Player Classification System in which players are classified into classes (Class<br />
I, II, III, and IV) based upon the players’ functional capacity to play (Class I is the most disabled). The players are required to have good<br />
skills for controlling wheelchair as well as for playing basketball. However, there is little study that analyzed both game performances<br />
and activities. The aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to compare these two abilities between a Japanese top team and a team in the medium level.<br />
Methods: We recorded video images <strong>of</strong> players <strong>of</strong> the team C (the men’s top team in Japan) and the team K (medium level) in the preliminary<br />
game <strong>of</strong> the Japan wheelchair basketball championship in 2007. From the video images we measured the wheelchair basketball<br />
performances and compared each data <strong>of</strong> team C and team K. The wheelchair basketball performances were classified the game<br />
performance and the activity pr<strong>of</strong>ile which was divided into high, middle, low intensities <strong>of</strong> pushing the wheel (high being fast rotation <strong>of</strong><br />
the wheel and low being slow rotation).<br />
Results: The number <strong>of</strong> screen plays per one <strong>of</strong>fence period was also higher in the team C than in the team K. In the team C, field players<br />
almost equally played for passing, dribbling and screening, however the number <strong>of</strong> attempted shots and rebounds were higher in Class<br />
III and IV players. In the team K, players <strong>of</strong> Class III and IV held possession for the majority <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fence. As for the control <strong>of</strong> wheelchair,<br />
the rate <strong>of</strong> high intensity in total playing time was higher in the team C than in the team K. The average time <strong>of</strong> high intensity in team C<br />
was longer than in team K.<br />
OSLO/NORWAY, JUNE 24-27, 2009 567