23.12.2012 Views

european college of sport science

european college of sport science

european college of sport science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Saturday, June 27th, 2009<br />

Mujika I, Padilla S. (2000) Sports Med, 30(2), 79-87.<br />

RELIABILITY OF LUMBAR POSITION SENSE TEST USING ELECTROGONIOMETER IN SEATED POSITION ON A SWISS BALL.<br />

SOLANA, M.<br />

UNIVERSITY RAMON LLULL<br />

Introduction: Joint position sense has been used to measure proprioception with isokinetic dynamometer (Lephart & Fu, 2000) or 3space<br />

track (Newcomer et al, 2000; Shum et al, 2007). It hasn’t been measured with electronic goniometer on lumbar spine.Therefore, the aim<br />

<strong>of</strong> this study was to determine the reliability <strong>of</strong> lumbar position sense test over a swiss ball using electrogoniometer (Transducer TSD130A<br />

from Biopac Systems, USA).<br />

Methods: Twelve healthy volunteers, 8 men and 4 women (22.3+/-2.6 vs. 23+/-1.8 respectively) performed maximal flexion and extension<br />

lumbar movement 3 consecutive trials, sitting over a Swiss ball with hips and knees between 80º and 90º <strong>of</strong> flexion maintaining the<br />

back straight keeping the sight to the front and both hands over the knees on a relaxed position. This was repeated in two different days.<br />

The Electrogoniometer was attached on the skin, its cranial arm following lumbar line up to L3 level and lower arm following lumbar line<br />

under L3 level. Repositioning error data were collected. It was required to maintain during 3 seconds each perceived maximal flexion<br />

and extension position during each <strong>of</strong> the three trials. There was neither feedback nor order along the test. Intertest repeatability was<br />

obtained calculating the variability coefficient between trials in the same day <strong>of</strong> test. Intratest repeatability obtained using Wilcoxon non<br />

parametric statistic analysis between tests in two different days. Intertest repeatability was considered when variability coefficient was<br />

lower than 100% and Intratest repeatability was considered with Wilcoxon significance p&#8805; 0.05.<br />

Results: Variability coefficient means were from 5.8% to 10% for both repositioning errors. Bilateral signification from Wilcoxon test was<br />

p=0.285 reaching maximal flexion and p=0.508 reaching maximal extension.<br />

Conclusions: The results suggest that the electrogoniometer is a reliable instrument to measure the lumbar position sense over a Swiss<br />

ball. It could be an easy and less sophisticate way to improve lumbar proprioception researches.<br />

References:<br />

Lephart, S., Fu, F. (2000). Proprioception and Neuromuscular Control in Joint Stability. U.S.A: Human Kinetics.<br />

Newcomer, K., Laskowski, M.D., Yu, B. i Larson, D. (2000). Repositioning error in low back pain. Comparing trunk repositioning error in<br />

subjects with chronic low back pain and control subjects. Spine, 25(2), 245-250.<br />

Shum, G.L., Crosbie, J. i Lee, R.Y. (2007).Three-dimensional kinetics <strong>of</strong> the lumbar spine and hips in low back pain patients during sit-tostand<br />

and stand-to-sit. Spine, 32(7), 211-219.<br />

ANALYSIS OF HEART RATE IN THE ELITE KITEBOARDING: NATIONAL CUP 2008<br />

PEREZ-TURPIN, J., CORTELL-TORMO, J.M., CHINCHILLA-MIRA, J.J., CEJUELA-ANTA, R.<br />

UNIVERSITY OF ALICANTE<br />

Introduction: The principal aim <strong>of</strong> this study is to identify the intensity that supposes competition to participant in 2008 Spain National Cup.<br />

Physiological demands and intensity <strong>of</strong> the effort have been analyzed in new Olympic windsurf board (Castagna et al, 2007) and Laser<br />

and mistral sail (Vogiatzis et al, 2002). This data was recorded in Elite International level although it was not under racing conditions.<br />

Kiteboarding is a new water <strong>sport</strong>. The athlete (Nickel et al, 2004) uses a small board and transfers the energy <strong>of</strong> the wind into speed by<br />

a large maneuverable kite.<br />

Methods: Ten male pr<strong>of</strong>essionals windsurfers (n=9, 27.6±22 years, 174.1±5.1 cm Height, 74.4±8.6 Kg weight, 9.91±3.4 kg body fat). Were<br />

chosen the ten first qualified <strong>of</strong> elite Kiteboarding: Spain National Cup 2008 (organised by Royal Spanish Sailing Federation,and the<br />

Spanish Association <strong>of</strong> Kiteboarding (AEK), Santa Pola (Spain) 2008) and were monitorizaded during the firts race, (racing form,R1) valid to<br />

the final classification in the championship. It was used a GPS recording unit (outdoor <strong>sport</strong>s computer series W 600). The s<strong>of</strong>tware was<br />

used in order to analyze data to FRWD outdoor <strong>sport</strong>s computers series for the GPS data. After assessment, data was analysed statistically<br />

using the SPSS 13.0 s<strong>of</strong>tware package to compare kiteboarding parameters. Wind´s speed varied from 10 to 14 m•s-¹. Anemometer<br />

was (AVM-40, Kestrel 4000).<br />

Results: Heart rate (HR) and average temperature (30.6±1.2ºC) was recorded, making a difference in the total time <strong>of</strong> the course (16.5±1.4<br />

min). On one hand with up-wind leg (8±0.1 min, 19.02±7.2 km•h-¹, 127.37±4.1 beats•min-¹) and also on the other hand with down-wind<br />

leg (8.5±0.7 min, 14.43±8.1 km•h-¹, 140±8.5 beats•min-¹).<br />

Discussion: Values <strong>of</strong> heart rate are significantly higher than those obtained in other studies windsurf (Castagna et al, 2007; Vogiatzis et<br />

al, 2002). This may be due to the way in which data were recorded (higher wind speed, the kite higher and the structure <strong>of</strong> competition).<br />

Actually there are significant differences (p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!