23.12.2012 Views

european college of sport science

european college of sport science

european college of sport science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Thursday, June 25th, 2009<br />

THE DEPLETION OF A FIXED ANAEROBIC ENERGY STORE DOES NOT EXPLAIN TASK FAILURE DURING HIGH-INTENSITY<br />

EXERCISE<br />

DE VRIJER, A., BISHOP, D.<br />

UNIVERSITY OF VERONA<br />

THE DEPLETION OF A FIXED ANAEROBIC ENERGY STORE DOES NOT EXPLAIN TASK FAILURE DURING HIGH-INTENSITY EXERCISE<br />

Introduction: Exercise at intensities above VO2max can only be sustained for several minutes. As the energy required to exercise at such<br />

intensities can, by definition, not be generated solely by the aerobic system, the cause <strong>of</strong> task-failure has <strong>of</strong>ten been attributed to the<br />

exhaustion <strong>of</strong> anaerobic energy stores. This is the basis <strong>of</strong> the critical power (CP) model, which states that, when the required power<br />

exceeds the maximum power <strong>of</strong> the aerobic system (the so-called CP), task failure will coincide with the depletion <strong>of</strong> a fixed anaerobic<br />

energy store. The obvious corollary <strong>of</strong> this is that following task failure, subjects will not be able to continue exercising unless the power<br />

output is decreased to below the CP. The purpose <strong>of</strong> the present study was to test this hypothesis.<br />

Methods: Seven healthy males each performed an incremental test on a cycle ergometer to determine their power at VO2max (P100%),<br />

followed by a familiarisation trial and 4 time-to-task failure (TTF) tests at 120% <strong>of</strong> VO2max (P120%). The first 3 TTF tests were identical and<br />

used to determine TTF at P120% (TTF_120). To ensure that TTF_120 represented the maximum performance <strong>of</strong> the subjects at this intensity,<br />

only the best TTF <strong>of</strong> the three tests was used. The last TTF test was similar to the first three, but the subjects were now instructed to continue<br />

exercising until TTF_120, if possible, and at the moment they reached this time, power output was decreased to P105% and subjects<br />

were asked to continue again as long as possible (TTF_105). Capillary blood was sampled before each test, at task failure, and after 5<br />

min <strong>of</strong> recovery at 60W.<br />

Results: All subjects were able to reach TTF_120 (186 ñ 32 s) during the final TTF test. Six <strong>of</strong> the subjects were able to continue exercising at<br />

P105% for over 25 s (mean TTF_105 was an additional 61 ñ 48 s). There was no significant difference between the [BLa] <strong>of</strong> TTF_120 and<br />

TFT_105 measured during rest (0.9 ñ 0.2 vs. 0.9 ñ 0.1 mmol/L) or at task failure (13.9 ñ 2.7 vs 14.9 ñ 3.2 mmol/L), but [BLa] was significantly<br />

different after the 5 min <strong>of</strong> recovery (14.3 ñ 1.9 vs 15.6 ñ 2.1 mmol/l). Also the heart rate was significantly higher after TTF_105 (185 ñ 9 bpm)<br />

than after TTF_120 (179 ñ 8 bpm). There was no significant difference between the VO2 after TTF_120 and TTF_105 (49.0 ñ 5.6 vs. 51.3 ñ 4.0<br />

ml/kg/min).<br />

Discussion/Conclusions<br />

After cycling to task failure at P120%, six <strong>of</strong> the seven subjects were able to continue exercising at P105%. These results cannot be explained<br />

by the critical power model, since this model predicts that the anaerobic work capacity must have been depleted at TTF_120,<br />

making it impossible to continue exercising at any intensity above CP (i.e., requiring a further anaerobic contribution). Thus, our results<br />

suggest that the depletion <strong>of</strong> a fixed anaerobic energy store does not explain task failure during high-intensity exercise.<br />

HANDGRIP STRENGTH AND FOREARM VASCULAR FUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS<br />

KEEWAN, E., ALOMARI, M., ALAWNEH, K., IBRAHEEM, R., KHATIB, S.<br />

JORDAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY<br />

INTRODUCTION: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with compromised arterial function (AF) attributed to endothelium-dependent and<br />

independent structural and functional changes. Additionally, physical activities (PA) play a critical role in enhancing vasodilatory capacity<br />

subsequent to improved fitness level (FL) in healthy and diseased populations. Despite the accumulating evidence describing the benefits<br />

RA patients gain from participating in regular PA, the relationship between FL and AF in RA patients is not clear. Accordingly, the current<br />

study examined the relationship between maximum handgrip strength (MHGS) and AF measures in RA patients.<br />

METHODOLGY<br />

Measures <strong>of</strong> AF and MHGS were examined in 22 RA patients (PT) and 13 healthy controls (CT) with age range (17-49). Dominant forearm<br />

arterial inflow (BF), at rest (RBF) and after 5 minutes <strong>of</strong> upper arm occlusion (IBF), were obtained using strain gauge plethysmography.<br />

Subsequently vascular resistances (VR) at rest (RVR) and after occlusion (IVR) were calculated with mean arterial pressure/BF. Average<br />

MHGS was calculated after 3 consecutive allout gripping trials with hand dynamometer. Student t-tests were used to compare forearm<br />

AF measures and MHGS between PT and CT groups whereas measures <strong>of</strong> forearm AF relationships with MHGS were evaluated using<br />

Pearson correlation.<br />

RESULTS: Forearm RBF (CT: 3.8 ± 0.8 vs. PT: 3.0 ± 1.2 ml/100ml/min; p=0.03), and IBF (CT: 31.7 ± 7.3 vs. PT:18.0 ± 5.9 ml/100ml/min;<br />

p=0.0001) were greater in the CTs, whereas RVR (CT: 23.6 ± 3.9 vs. PT: 33.0 ± 15.4 U; p=0.01), and IVR (CT: 2.8 ± 0.5 vs. PT: 5.9 ± 3.9 U;<br />

p=0.001) were less in the CTs. Similarly, MHGS in the CTs was greater than in the PTs (CT: 32.5 ± 13.4 vs. PT: 21.3 ± 11.3 Kg; p=0.02). Finally,<br />

MHGS correlated positively with RBF (r=0.5; p=0.002), and IBF (r=0.7; p=0.0001) as well as negatively with RVR (r=- 0.3; p=0.07), and<br />

IVR (r=- 0.4; p=0.04).<br />

DISCUSSION: The results confirm previous studies indicating diminished AF and MHGS in RA PTs. However the relationships between<br />

forearm AF and MHGS suggests that FL contribute to enhancing the vasculature in RA PTs. Additionally the association between forearm<br />

AF measures and MHGS suggest that AF is locally controlled in RA PTs.<br />

14:15 - 15:15<br />

Poster presentations<br />

PP-PH17 Physiology 17<br />

MODULATION OF HOFFMANN REFLEX: THE ROLE OF GROUP III-IV MUSCLE AFFERENT FIBERS<br />

LAURIN, J.<br />

MOVEMENT SCIENCE INSTITUTE (UMR-CNRS 6233)<br />

Introduction: The H<strong>of</strong>fmann (H) reflex is frequently used to explore the spinal sensorimotor plasticity in response to physical exercise or to<br />

training. However, neural mechanisms responsible <strong>of</strong> H-reflex modulation after exercise remain unclear. Numerous studies suggested<br />

OSLO/NORWAY, JUNE 24-27, 2009 217

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!