23.12.2012 Views

european college of sport science

european college of sport science

european college of sport science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

OP-PH15 Physiology 15<br />

Conclusion<br />

The biological maturity status significantly influences the functional capacity and athletic performance (speed and aerobic endurance)<br />

and highlights the inter-relationship <strong>of</strong> growth, maturity and functional characteristics <strong>of</strong> youth soccer players. The lack <strong>of</strong> further improvements<br />

in aerobic endurance capacity and sprint abilities <strong>of</strong> soccer players being 16 yrs and older detected in this study underlines<br />

the importance <strong>of</strong> continuing and improving the proportion <strong>of</strong> athletic training in adult soccer players.<br />

15:15 - 16:45<br />

Oral presentations<br />

OP-PH15 Physiology 15<br />

HIGH INTENSITY SHOCK MICROCYCLES: AN EFFICIENT METHOD FOR IMPROVING VO2MAX IN JUNIOR ALPINE SKIERS<br />

BREIL, F.A., WEBER, S.N., KOLLER, S., HOPPELER, H., VOGT, M.<br />

1 INSTITUTE OF ANATOMY, UNIVERSITY OF BERN, SWITZERLAND, 2 INSTITUTE OF HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCES AND SPORT, SWISS FEDERAL<br />

INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ZURICH, SWITZERLAND, 3 INSTITUTE OF SPORT AND SPORT SCI<br />

Introduction: Maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) is <strong>of</strong>ten used to predict aerobic endurance capacity. In already-trained soccer<br />

players, VO2max can be further improved by performing high-intensity interval training (HIT) sessions twice a week over two months<br />

(Helgerud et al., 2001). Alternatively, it seems that VO2max can effectively be increased when HIT sessions are performed once or twice<br />

daily within a condensed 10-day shock microcycle (Stolen et al., 2005). Such a concept could be particularly useful for athletes who cannot<br />

afford the time for extensive endurance training due to high technical and strength demands <strong>of</strong> their <strong>sport</strong>. The aim <strong>of</strong> our study was<br />

to investigate the effect <strong>of</strong> an 11-day high-intensity shock microcycle on endurance and jump performance in junior alpine skiers.<br />

Methods: Six female and sixteen male subjects (age: 17.0 ± 1.1 yr, body mass: 67.3 ± 10.4 kg) were matched and randomly assigned to<br />

either a high-intensity interval training group (HIT, N = 13) or a control training group (CON, N = 8). HIT performed 15 HIT-sessions (12 on a<br />

cycle ergometer, 3 on an obstacle course) during 11 days. Each session consisted <strong>of</strong> 4×4 min at 90-95% <strong>of</strong> the individual maximal heart<br />

rate (HRmax), separated by 3-min recovery periods. CON continued their normal mixed training including endurance and strength sessions.<br />

Before, 24 hours and seven days after the training period, anthropometric data were gathered and ramp tests to exhaustion on a<br />

cycle ergometer were performed to determine HRmax, VO2max, peak power output (PPO) and the first and second ventilatory thresholds<br />

(VT1, VT2). At the same time-points, countermovement and squat jumps were performed on a force plate.<br />

Results and discussion: Body mass and fat-free mass were reduced in HIT only (-1.0%,-1.1% (P < 0.05), respectively). Seven days postintervention<br />

HIT significantly improved VO2max by 6.0% (pre: 53.0 ± 4.6, post: 56.2 ± 5.1 mL•kg-1•min-1; P < 0.01) and PPO by 4.4% (pre:<br />

5.2 ± 0.4, post: 5.5 ± 0.5 W•kg-1; P < 0.01). CON showed slight but nonsignificant improvements in VO2max (+3.0%) and PPO (+2.0%).<br />

Power output at VT2 increased in HIT by 9.6% (P < 0.01), but not in CON, whereas jump height was unchanged in both groups. In the HITgroup<br />

the described functional improvements were already present but to a lesser extent in the post 24-hours measurements.<br />

Our results show that high-intensity interval block training might be a very time efficient way to improve VO2max, PPO, and the power<br />

output at VT2 in junior alpine skiers. Accumulated fatigue <strong>of</strong> such an intense training cycle seems to delay the development <strong>of</strong> the functional<br />

adaptations. Therefore, athletes and coaches should plan rest-days to ensure adequate recovery and maximal training effect.<br />

- Helgerud J. et al., 2001; Med Sci Sports Exerc 33(11): 1925-31<br />

- Stolen T. et al., 2005; Sports Med 35(6): 501-536<br />

ACTIVE OR PASSIVE - THE INFLUENCE OF TWO DIFFERENT REST PROTOCOLS ON POWER OUTPUT, LACTATE AND PH<br />

TIME COURSE AND PEAK OXYGEN UPTAKE DURING HIGH INTENSITY TRAINING <br />

HAEGELE, M., ZINNER, C., WAHL, P., SPERLICH, B., MESTER, J.<br />

GERMAN SPORT UNIVERSITY COLOGNE<br />

Introduction: During past years much scientific effort has been undertaken to observe the effects <strong>of</strong> high intensity training (HIT) on endurance<br />

performance. Although many studies used varying intensities during the exercise bouts, much less data exists describing how the<br />

recovery periods between the intense bouts should be realized. To answer this question, the role <strong>of</strong> lactate and hence pH has to be<br />

considered, since the accumulating lactate during passive recovery is still <strong>of</strong>ten considered as major parameter causing muscle fatigue.<br />

Latest scientific research reports by contrast that lactate acts as energy reservoir and signal molecule. Due to these findings, the aim <strong>of</strong><br />

this study was to compare the effects <strong>of</strong> two different rest protocols power output and physiological parameters.<br />

Methods: 12 male endurance athletes (age: 24,4 ± 3,9 years, height: 183,9 ± 4,6 cm, weight: 76,2 ± 7,2 kg) completed two testing sessions<br />

on a cycle ergometer. Each testing session consisted <strong>of</strong> a 10min warm up at 2 Watt/kg followed by four 30sec maximal sprints. The<br />

10min recovery periods between the sprints were either active (ACT, cycling at 1,5 Watt/kg) or completely passive (PAS), which was assigned<br />

randomly. Peak Power (PP) and Mean Power (MP) were detected for each sprint. During the recovery intervals capillary blood was<br />

used to detect lactate concentrations (Lac) at 0, 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9min. Furthermore pH was measured at 2, 6 and 9min, whereas oxygen<br />

uptake (V02peak) was observed during the whole training session.<br />

Results: MP was 749 ± 120, 741 ± 122, 720 ± 120 and 709 ± 108 Watt for ACT and 740 ± 109, 712 ± 91, 660 ± 90 and 653 ± 93 Watt for<br />

PAS. The difference between the two recovery protocols reached statistical significance at the 3rd & 4th bout. Lac were similar 0, 1, 3 and<br />

5min after the first bout but the concentrations in ACT decreased significantly from 7min and remained lower for all following points <strong>of</strong><br />

measurement. pH differed significantly from 9min after the second bout, showing higher values for ACT. Analysis <strong>of</strong> spirometric data<br />

revealed no statistical difference for VO2peak during the bouts.<br />

Conclusion: Our study revealed that the active recovery protocol was more sufficient to sustain power output over four consecutive maximal<br />

bouts. Furthermore it can be speculated if an active recovery process allows an athlete to perform more intense intervals in a row.<br />

Anyhow, dependent on the aim <strong>of</strong> a training intervention one should consider possible differences in metabolic stimuli due to different<br />

recovery protocols and resulting lactate concentrations as well as acid-base balances. Several studies provide evidence for an impact <strong>of</strong><br />

acidosis and lactate on growth hormones and transcription factors which would favor passive recovery protocols due to greater physio-<br />

274 14 TH<br />

ANNUAL CONGRESS OF THE EUROPEAN COLLEGE OF SPORT SCIENCE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!