23.12.2012 Views

european college of sport science

european college of sport science

european college of sport science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PP-PH01 Physiology 1<br />

treadmill, in what concerns to absolute values (22.79 and 26.36 mg/dl respectively before and after the MTB treadmill), they remained<br />

normal. The results <strong>of</strong> this study pointed out for a contribution <strong>of</strong> protein metabolism to energy production in MTB events <strong>of</strong> long distance<br />

that could be prevented by an adequate carbohydrate supplementation.<br />

EFFECTS OF STATIC STRETCHING ON PROLONGED INTERMITTENT EXERCISE PERFORMANCE<br />

MIYAHARA, Y., MIEDA, K., EBASHI, H.<br />

UNIVERSITY OF EAST ASIA<br />

PURPOSE: The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to investigate effects <strong>of</strong> static stretching on prolonged intermittent exercise performance. METH-<br />

ODS: Eight male university football players (age; 20±1 yr, height; 172.5±5.3 cm, weight; 65.6±4.9 kg, mean±SD) participated in this study.<br />

They completed two 30min intermittent pedaling exercises with a 10min interval under three experimental conditions (passive rest (PR),<br />

active rest (AR), and static stretching (SS)). The intermittent exercise protocols consisted <strong>of</strong> thirty sets, each set including 5-s maximal sprint<br />

against a resistance <strong>of</strong> 7.5% body mass, 25-s active recovery, and 30-s passive rest. During the maximal sprint, peak-pedaling frequency,<br />

mean power output, and mean power rate against peak power were evaluated and mean values <strong>of</strong> 30 sets were used for<br />

analysis. Rate <strong>of</strong> perceived exertion (RPE) and blood lactate concentration (La) were determined at rest, 10, 20, and 30th set during the first<br />

intermittent exercise, five and ninth min in the interval, and 10, 20, and 30th set during the second intermittent exercise. In addition, a<br />

recovery rate <strong>of</strong> La was calculated as follows: La recovery rate = (mean La at the first intermittent exercise – mean La at the interval) /<br />

(mean La at the first intermittent exercise - La at rest). In the interval between exercises, subjects were performed three treatments as<br />

follows; 6min PR, 6min AR or 6min SS. For PR, subjects were required to sit the chair in a relaxed position for 6min. For AR, subjects performed<br />

light pedaling on a cycle ergometer (10%load <strong>of</strong> 0.075kp/kg) at 50rpm for 6min. For SS, thigh (hamstrings and quadriceps) and<br />

hip were stretched to the point where they perceived discomfort. During the SS, subjects held at the stretch position for 30s and repeated<br />

it two times for each leg. The experimental conditions order was randomly assigned on three non-consecutive days, to rule out order<br />

effects. RESULTS: La was significantly decreased by all treatments but the La recovery rate did not different among conditions (PR;<br />

31.6±15.2%, AR; 42.4±21.5%, SS; 39.3±13.5%). Peak pedaling frequency and mean power were not altered by any conditions (peak<br />

pedaling frequency: PR; 163±10, 162±11rpm, AR; 161±6, 160±8rpm, SS; 164±10, 164±10rpm, mean power: PR; 675.3±100.1, 672.1±94.2W,<br />

AR; 657.2±73.2, 663.9±83.5W, SS; 672.8±92.0, 685.8±88.0W). Mean power rate significantly increased after SS (p < 0.05) whereas PR<br />

and AR produced no changes in mean power rate (PR; 85.8±5.1, 86.0±5.2%, AR; 85.2±4.5, 86.0±4.4%, SS; 85.0±3.0, 87.0±3.2%). CON-<br />

CLUSIONS: The SS may increase the prolonged intermittent exercise performance although the SS does not facilitate La removal.<br />

PREDICTION OF MAXIMUM AEROBIC POWER AND MAXIMUM POWER OUTPUT FROM THE RESULTS OF 30-S AN-<br />

AEROBIC WINGATE TEST<br />

VODICKA, P., HELLER, J.<br />

FACULTY OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND SPORT, CHARLES UNIVERSITY,<br />

Introduction: Laboratory exercise testing in athletes is based on aerobic and anaerobic tests. In general, aerobic exercise tests are time<br />

consuming and demand for highly sophisticated equipment, e.g. gas analysers and ventilometers that should be precisely calibrated.<br />

Contrary to this, anaerobic exercise test are usually less time consuming and based on relatively simple principles. The aim <strong>of</strong> the study<br />

was to verify the possibility to predict the main parameters <strong>of</strong> aerobic tests from the results <strong>of</strong> anaerobic exercise test, i.e. 30-s Wingate<br />

test.<br />

Methods: Altogether 152 top league ice-hockey players (age: 25.96 +/- 4.72 (SD) years; mass: 87.73 +/- 8.17 kg; height: 182.4 +/- 5.7 cm)<br />

participated in the study. They were examined at the end <strong>of</strong> preparatory period before the season. In the same day they were tested by a<br />

30-s Wingate test at a resistance 6 W.kg-1 (=0.104 kg.kg-1), and after 2-hour-lasting recovery break they were loaded by the stepwise<br />

maximum cycle ergometry. The statistics included multiple stepwise linear regression analysis using SPSS statistical package. Age, body<br />

mass, height, fat-free mass, and Wingate test results were considered independent variables whereas maximum aerobic power<br />

(VO2max) and maximum power were considered dependent variables. As peak blood lactate concentration (LA) in the Wingate test is<br />

sometimes (but not as a standard) included to the results <strong>of</strong> the Wingate test, the results were computed both with and without LA as an<br />

independent variable.<br />

Results: Pmax [W] = 351.227 + 0.322*Pmin [W] – 2.867*MP/PP [%] + 0.880*Age [y]<br />

r= 0.685; SEE= 25.159; sign. 2.976E-20<br />

Pmax/kg [W.kg-1] = 9.016 – 0.055*Body mass [kg] – 0.004*Pmin [W] – 0.039*MP/PP [%] + 0.012*Age [y]<br />

r= 0.694; SEE= 0.287; sign. 3.559E-20<br />

VO2max [l.min-1] = 0.487 + 0.003*Pmin [W] + 0.015*Body mass [kg] + 0.053*LA [mmol.l-1]<br />

r= 0.662; SEE= 0.372; sign. 1.750E-18<br />

VO2max [l.min-1] = 1.375 + 0.003*Pmin [W] + 0.015*Body mass [kg]<br />

r= 0.641; SEE= 0.380; sign. 7.453E-18<br />

VO2max/kg [ml.kg-1.min-1] = 36.437 + 2.935*Pmin/kg [W.kg-1] - 0.166*Body mass [kg] + 0.603*LA [mmol.l-1]<br />

r= 0.539; SEE= 4.301; sign. 4.972E-11<br />

VO2max/kg [ml.kg-1.min-1] = 47.670 + 2.797*Pmin/kg [W.kg-1] - 0.174*Body mass [kg]<br />

r= 0.506; SEE= 4.388; sign. 2.621E-10<br />

Discussion: Regardless the substantial differences in the nature <strong>of</strong> the aerobic cycle ergometer test and anaerobic Wingate test the results<br />

had demonstrated the possibility to predict the parameters <strong>of</strong> aerobic tests from the results <strong>of</strong> the 30-s Wingate test. The standard<br />

errors <strong>of</strong> the estimate obtained form these equation seem to be considerably low and therefore acceptable, however coefficients <strong>of</strong><br />

correlation (r) ranging 0.506 to 0.694 and/or coefficient <strong>of</strong> determination (R2) 0.256 to 0.482 may limit the predictive validity <strong>of</strong> VO2max<br />

and Pmax from the Wingate test Results: References<br />

Inbar O, Bar-Or O, Skinner J.S. (1996). The Wingate Anaerobic Test. Human Kinetics, Champaign.<br />

Carey D.G., Richardson M.T. (2003). J. Sports Sci Med (2003) 2, 151-157.<br />

250 14 TH<br />

ANNUAL CONGRESS OF THE EUROPEAN COLLEGE OF SPORT SCIENCE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!