23.12.2012 Views

european college of sport science

european college of sport science

european college of sport science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

OP-PP03 Physical Education and Pedagogics 3<br />

EXPLORING THE INFLUENCE OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION PREDISPOSITIONS ON PHYSICAL EDUCATION OUTCOMES<br />

HILLAND, T., FAIRCLOUGH, S., STRATTON, G., RIDGERS, N.<br />

LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY, UK<br />

Introduction: The Youth Physical Activity Promotion Model (YPAPM; Welk, 1999) describes predisposing factors <strong>of</strong> attitude, enjoyment,<br />

perceived competence and self efficacy as key influences on young people’s physical activity. These factors may be important within the<br />

school Physical Education (PE) setting which has been identified as an influential context for enhancing young people’s physical activity. A<br />

key goal <strong>of</strong> PE is to develop physically educated and physically active youth (NASPE, 2004). The study purpose was to explore the influence<br />

<strong>of</strong> psychological predispositions in PE on theoretical outcomes <strong>of</strong> PE, including physical activity levels, knowledge and understanding<br />

<strong>of</strong> physical activity, and perceived links to opportunities available for out <strong>of</strong> school physical activity.<br />

Methods: Two hundred and ninety-one Year 8 and 9 children (208 girls, 83 boys; aged 12-14 years) from three schools in the North West<br />

<strong>of</strong> England participated in this study. They completed a questionnaire pack which included the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older<br />

Children (PAQ-C; Crocker et al., 1997), and items relating to knowledge and understanding <strong>of</strong> health-related exercise, perceived PE ability<br />

and worth, and how PE impacts upon physical activity participation outside <strong>of</strong> school. Sex-specific multiple regression analyses were<br />

used to explore the inter-relationships between variables.<br />

Results: Perceived PE Worth and Ability accounted for similar amounts <strong>of</strong> variance in self-reported physical activity and knowledge <strong>of</strong><br />

physical activity opportunities available outside <strong>of</strong> school, for boys (19.4-26.2%), and girls (14-16.3%). The significant predictor within each<br />

model differed between boys and girls; boys’ Perceived PE Worth predicted physical activity levels (p < 0.03, B = 0.2, [S.E. = 0.09], &#946;<br />

= .26), while for girls Perceived PE Ability was the most important variable (p < 0.01, B = 0.30, [S.E. = 0.07], &#946; = .35). Types <strong>of</strong> physical<br />

activities participated in outside <strong>of</strong> school was impacted upon by Perceived PE Ability for boys (p < 0.01, B = 0.7, [S.E. = 0.16], &#946; = .5),<br />

and by Perceived PE Worth for girls (p < 0.01, B = 0.35, [S.E. = 0.09], &#946; = .33). Boys’ Perceived PE Ability influenced their awareness <strong>of</strong><br />

physical activity opportunities outside <strong>of</strong> school (p = 0.008, B = 0.47, [S.E. = 0.17], &#946; = .33) but for girls Perceived PE Worth had<br />

greater effect (p < 0.01, B = 0.48, [S.E. = 0.1], &#946; = .38).<br />

Discussion: These results suggest that gender differences exist in how psychological predispositions in PE affect intended theoretical PE<br />

outcomes. Physical educators should be aware <strong>of</strong> these gender differences in order to develop targeted pedagogical strategies to enhance<br />

students’ attainment <strong>of</strong> positive PE outcomes.<br />

References<br />

Crocker P R, Bailey D A, Faulkner R A, Kowalski K C, McGrath, R. (1997). Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 29, 1344-1349.<br />

NASPE. (2004). Moving into the future: National standards for Physical Education. Reston, Va: NASPE Publications.<br />

Welk G. (1999). Quest, 51, 5-23.<br />

THE WORLD GYMNAESTRADA - A MODERN FORM OF LING GYMNASTICS?<br />

MECKBACH, J., LUNDQUIST WANNEBERG, P.<br />

THE SWEDISH SCHOOL OF SPORT AND HEALTH SCIENCES<br />

The World Gymnaestrada – A Modern Form <strong>of</strong> Ling Gymnastics?<br />

Introduction: Different forms <strong>of</strong> kinetic culture were developed in Europe at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the 19th century. One <strong>of</strong> these was Ling gymnastics<br />

(Lundvall & Meckbach, 2003; Lundquist Wanneberg, 2004; Pfister, 2003). Ling gymnastics has been described as one <strong>of</strong> Sweden’s<br />

biggest cultural export products and in 1939 an international gymnastic display, the Lingiad, was held in Stockholm. But Gymnastics<br />

festivals are not a select Swedish phenomenon (Pfister 2007). The first World Gymnaestrada (WG) was held in Rotterdam in 1953. The<br />

focus in this study is on the conceptual content <strong>of</strong> Ling gymnastics evident in the type <strong>of</strong> gymnastics performed, Gymnastics For All (GFA),<br />

at the WG.<br />

Methods: Three concept pairs General-Elite, Collectivism-Individualism, and Modesty-Ambition have been used to both capture and<br />

analyse the elements <strong>of</strong> Ling gymnastics evident in the WG. The study is based on 20 group interviews (semi-structured) with a total <strong>of</strong> 53<br />

gymnasts and 87 observations (semi-structures with an observational list) carried out during 2007 WG.<br />

Results: The results show: i) one similarity between the two forms <strong>of</strong> gymnastics is amateurism: no one pr<strong>of</strong>ited financially from their<br />

involvement, ii) another similarity is the view <strong>of</strong> collectivism and general: gymnastics should be done together and should be available for<br />

all, iii) the idea behind both gives everyone an opportunity to participate.<br />

Discussion: The answer to the question whether the WG’s concept <strong>of</strong> gymnastics, GFA, can be regarded as a modern form <strong>of</strong> Ling gymnastics<br />

is yes, with certain reservations. The study has shown that there also are differences in content; differences that to some extent<br />

can be explained by structural changes when it comes to the view <strong>of</strong> the individual versus the collective. But in terms <strong>of</strong> the approach to<br />

the type <strong>of</strong> display and an emphasis on diversity, the basic principles are the same. The final question is how a Swedish gymnastics form<br />

that is rooted in the early 19th century can live on in an international context today? As been pointed out by the Norwegian sociologist,<br />

Augestad (2001) and the German historian, Pfister (2003) the universality <strong>of</strong> the Ling gymnastics made it compatible with cultures other<br />

than Swedish. Obviously so even today – at least part <strong>of</strong> it.<br />

References<br />

Augestad,P. (2001). Sosiologisk tidskrift 9 (3), 233-253.<br />

Kihlmark, O. (1988) Sv Idrottshistoriska föreningens årsskrift, 43-50.<br />

Lundvall, S. & Meckbach, J. (2003). Ett ämne i rörelse. Diss. Stockholm.<br />

Lundquist Wanneberg, P. (2004) Kroppens medborgarfostran. Diss. Stockholm.<br />

Pfister, G. (2003). Sport in Society 6 (1), 61-91.<br />

Pfister, G. (2007), Stadion 33 (1), 49-70.<br />

510 14 TH<br />

ANNUAL CONGRESS OF THE EUROPEAN COLLEGE OF SPORT SCIENCE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!