23.12.2012 Views

european college of sport science

european college of sport science

european college of sport science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Thursday, June 25th, 2009<br />

the change in ankle angle. The Achilles tendon elongation was calculated as the difference between elongations <strong>of</strong> the MTU and muscle<br />

belly. Negligible muscle activity during the stretching was confirmed through surface electromyograms taken from the medial and lateral<br />

gastrocnemii, soleus, and tibialis anterior muscles during stretching. The fascicle length (FL) was also measured in the mid-belly <strong>of</strong> the<br />

medial gastrocnemius using ultrasonography.<br />

Results and Discussion: The passive dorsiflexion ROM increased significantly at the 4th week and later from the onset <strong>of</strong> the stretching<br />

program, which was accompanied by a significant increase in Achilles tendon elongation, especially in the dorsiflexed position. There<br />

was no further increase in muscle belly elongation in the dorsiflexed position. The plantar flexion torque passively attained at rest (0 deg<br />

<strong>of</strong> ankle joint) decreased significantly, while the FL increased significantly at the 4th week and later. This result indicates that the Achilles<br />

tendon elongation became smaller after the stretching program due to elongated fascicles and the muscle belly at rest at 0 deg <strong>of</strong> ankle<br />

joint. However, an increase in tendon elongation in the dorsiflexed position after the stretching program suggests a decrease in tendon<br />

stiffness, especially under higher passive tension. In conclusion, these results imply that the 6-week stretching program affects both<br />

mechanical and architectural properties <strong>of</strong> the gastrocnemius MTU, with different changes <strong>of</strong> muscular and tendinous components that<br />

are joint angle dependent.<br />

DOES CYCLING INFLUENCE NEUROMUSCULAR CONTROL DURING SUBSEQUENT RUNNING IN LESSER-TRAINED TRI-<br />

ATHLTES?<br />

BONACCI, J., CHAPMAN, A.R., BLANCH, P., VICENZINO, B.<br />

UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND, BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA., MCGILL UNIVERSITY, MONTREAL, CANADA., AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF SPORT, CAN-<br />

BERRA, AUSTRALIA<br />

Triathlon success depends primarily on a triathlete’s ability to run after cycling. As the neuromuscular system effectively translates cardiorespiratory<br />

capacity into efficient movement and therefore into optimal performance, triathletes’ performance relates closely to their ability<br />

to maintain neuromuscular control (muscle recruitment and movement patterns) that is specific to running and not adversely influenced<br />

by the preceding bike-leg1. However, a previous study has shown that running muscle recruitment is influenced by cycling in 36% <strong>of</strong><br />

highly-trained triathletes2, despite their years <strong>of</strong> training. This altered muscle recruitment is due to a direct influence <strong>of</strong> cycling on neuromuscular<br />

control during running, is independent <strong>of</strong> fatigue, and is associated with a decrease in running economy and a 2.5 times<br />

greater likelihood <strong>of</strong> exercise related leg pain3. However, it is not known if cycling has the same direct influence on neuromuscular control<br />

during running in lesser-trained triathletes. PURPOSE To investigate the direct influence <strong>of</strong> cycling on running muscle activity and<br />

movement patterns in lesser-trained triathletes. METHODS 15 lesser-trained triathletes participated. 3-D kinematics <strong>of</strong> the pelvis and<br />

lower limbs and recruitment <strong>of</strong> 11 leg and thigh muscles were compared between a control run (no prior exercise) and a 30 min run that<br />

was preceded by a 15 min cycle (transition run). RESULTS Neuromuscular control was not different between control and transition runs, or<br />

differences were only transient, in most triathletes. Changes in joint position (mean difference <strong>of</strong> 3°) were evident in 5 triathletes, but these<br />

changes persisted beyond 5 min <strong>of</strong> running in only 1 triathlete. One triathlete displayed altered recruitment <strong>of</strong> the biceps femoris muscle<br />

(7.4% decrease in average amplitude over the running stride), which was not associated with a change in kinematics, and persisted for<br />

20 min <strong>of</strong> the transition run. DISCUSSION Short periods <strong>of</strong> cycling have no direct influence on running muscle activity in most lesser-trained<br />

triathletes. Muscle recruitment during running was influenced by cycling in only 1 <strong>of</strong> 15 lesser-trained triathletes (< 7%), compared to 36%<br />

<strong>of</strong> highly-trained triathletes2, and the magnitude <strong>of</strong> this change was less than previously reported in highly-trained triathletes (7.4% vs. 10-<br />

20%). Cycling did cause some transient changes to running kinematics in 30% <strong>of</strong> lesser-trained triathletes. Our findings suggest that<br />

optimal neuromuscular control for running is preserved after cycling in lesser-trained triathletes. The differing influence <strong>of</strong> cycling on<br />

neuromuscular control during subsequent running in lesser-trained and highly-trained triathletes is likely related to training history.<br />

1Bonacci et al. Sports Medicine. in press<br />

2Chapman et al. (2008) J Sci Med Sport, 11, 371-380<br />

3Chapman et al. (2008) Med Sci Sports Exerc. 40: p. s87<br />

RIGHT OR LEFT – IS THERE AN OPTIMAL INITIAL PRACTICE SIDE IN MOTOR LEARNING?<br />

STÖCKEL, T.<br />

UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG<br />

Introduction: Findings from neuro<strong>science</strong>s indicate, that the two hemispheres in the human brain are specialized for the processing <strong>of</strong><br />

distinct movement features (i.e. Serrien, Swinnen & Ivry, 2006). How this knowledge can be useful in motor learning remains unclear. In<br />

the present study two experiments on the acquisition <strong>of</strong> complex <strong>sport</strong>s motor skills are carried out to prove the relation between the<br />

initial practice side and inherent task de-mands.<br />

Methods<br />

Within a transfer design two groups practiced a novel motor task with same amount <strong>of</strong> practice on each hand, but in opposite handorder.<br />

Performance changes are measured on both sides separately after a practice period and after a period without practice. In experiment<br />

I subjects were asked to learn a throwing task with high demand on maxi-mum force production. Subjects initially practiced<br />

with their preferred hand and changed to the non-preferred (P-NP) benefited more from practice. In experiment II subjects were asked to<br />

learn a dribbling task with high demand on movement coordina-tion and speed. Subjects initially practiced this task with their nonpreferred<br />

hand before changing to preferred hand (NP-P) benefited more from practice than subjects practiced in opposite order.<br />

Results & Discussion: The results indicate, that tasks with high demand on spatial accuracy and movement coordination are learned<br />

better through initial practice with the non-preferred hand, whereas initial practice with the preferred hand seems to be more efficent for<br />

tasks with high demand on maximum force production. These findings suggest a strong relation between the initial practice side and the<br />

hemispherical specialization for different task demands. The present findings can be used to optimize early motor learning processes.<br />

References<br />

Serrien, D. A., Ivry, R. B. & Swinnen, S. P. (2006). Dynamics <strong>of</strong> interhemispheric spe-cialization and integration in the context <strong>of</strong> motor<br />

control. Nature Review Neuro<strong>science</strong>, 7, 160-167.<br />

OSLO/NORWAY, JUNE 24-27, 2009 195

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!