23.12.2012 Views

european college of sport science

european college of sport science

european college of sport science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Wednesday, June 24th, 2009<br />

Hasegawa, H., Yamauchi, T., and Kraemer, W.J. (2007) Foot strike patterns <strong>of</strong> runners at the 15-km point during an elite level half marathon.<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Strength and Conditioning Research 21(3): 888-893.<br />

13:00 - 14:00<br />

Poster presentations<br />

PP-CO02 Coaching 2<br />

THE MEETING IN A SUCCESSFULLY COACH-ATHLETE RELATIONSHIP<br />

JOHANSEN, B.T., SVELA, A.E.<br />

UNIVERSITY OF AGDER<br />

Introduction: The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to investigate the meeting that take place in pr<strong>of</strong>essional coaching in a coach-athlete relationship,<br />

all facets related to the process leading up to a successfully coach-athlete relationship (Jowett, 2008), communication in the<br />

relationship, type <strong>of</strong> leadership, and factors related to their satisfaction with performance and instruction <strong>of</strong> their coach-athlete relationship.<br />

Method<br />

Due to the two different types <strong>of</strong> <strong>sport</strong>s that exist, individual and team <strong>sport</strong>s, two different coach-athlete relationships were included in<br />

this study, but only results from the team dyad will be presented in this paper. The team <strong>sport</strong> coach and athlete are performing at top<br />

national level in football, and the dyad is respectively the head coach and the captain <strong>of</strong> the team. They share a history <strong>of</strong> three years<br />

together. The coach is 42 years <strong>of</strong> age, coaching experience from top national level for eight years with national cup trophy in 2000. The<br />

athlete is 35 years <strong>of</strong> age and has been playing at top national and international level for more than fifteen years.<br />

In-depth interviews were conducted and arranged to take place individually. An interview guide was used for gathering data and an<br />

Ipod recorder was used during the interview. Both interviews lasted for approximately 1 hours and 10 minutes.<br />

The analyses <strong>of</strong> the data obtained followed a phenomenological procedure (Aanstoos, 1983) trying to grasp and identifying meaning<br />

units, specifying central themes, and then articulating their psychological sense or meaning in order to examine the nature <strong>of</strong> the meeting<br />

in a successfully coach-athlete relationship.<br />

Results: Results from interviews with both the coach and the athlete in the team <strong>sport</strong> coach-athlete relationship indicated that factors<br />

such as social support, commitment, humor, use <strong>of</strong> time, attention, and carefulness are all important facets for the dimension building a<br />

successfully relationship. In the dimension communication vital facets appear to be thoroughly, the frequency, the consistency between<br />

verbal and non verbal communication, and the art <strong>of</strong> the informal communication during everyday practice. For the dimensions leadership<br />

and performance and instruction it seems to be respectively consistency for the coaching process, and focus on the impact <strong>of</strong> intrinsic<br />

motivation (Jowett, 2008) and evaluation <strong>of</strong> own development as most important.<br />

Discussion: In general both the coach and the athlete underlined the significance <strong>of</strong> consistency and commitment for a successfully<br />

relationship in order to perform in <strong>sport</strong>. The study also revealed that communication and democratic leadership is vital factors for the<br />

meeting in the relationship for both the coach and athlete to grow and develop which is in line with former research.<br />

References<br />

Aanstoos CM (1983). J Pheno Psych, 14, 243-266.<br />

Jowett S (2008). Scand J Med Sci, 18, 664-673.<br />

LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS AND COACH-ATHLETE RELATIONSHIPS IN SCANDINAVIAN COACHES<br />

JOHANSEN, B.T., CHRISTENSEN, J.B., ENOKSEN, E., FAHLSTRÖM, P.G., HAGESKOG, C.A., HØIGAARD, R.<br />

UNIVERSITY OF AGDER<br />

Introduction: The purpose <strong>of</strong> the study was to investigate in a sample <strong>of</strong> Scandinavian elite coaches, the relationship between perceptions<br />

<strong>of</strong> their own leadership behavior and their perception <strong>of</strong> the coach-athlete relationship.<br />

Method<br />

149 elite coaches (e.g. national top and/or international level) from Denmark (n=50), Norway (n=50) and Sweden (n=49) participated (134<br />

male, mean age 38.3±9.8yrs; 15 female, mean age 39.1±8.4). 58 percent <strong>of</strong> the coaches were coaches <strong>of</strong> individual <strong>sport</strong>s and 42<br />

percent were coaches <strong>of</strong> team <strong>sport</strong>s. 59 percent <strong>of</strong> the participants had at some point, undertaken academic study related to <strong>sport</strong> at<br />

university level. A paper-copy questionnaires were distributed by post to all coaches listed in each country’s athletic federation index.<br />

Leadership behaviour: Coaches self reported their perceptions <strong>of</strong> their own leadership behaviors using the Leadership Scale for Sport<br />

(Chelladurai & Saleh, 1980). The Cronbach’s alpha for self reported leadership behavior was: .79 training and instruction, .59 positive<br />

feedback, .66 social support, .78 democratic behavior, and .46 autocratic.<br />

Coach-athlete relationship: The nature <strong>of</strong> the coach-athlete relationship was evaluated using the 13-item Nordic Coach–Athlete Relationship<br />

Questionnaire (NOR-CART-Q; Jowett & Ntoumanis, 2003). The Cronbach’s alpha for closeness, commitment, and complementarity<br />

was .83, .72 and .67 respectively.<br />

Results: Positive feedback, training and instruction, and democratic behavior were the most frequent self-reported behavior subscales<br />

amongst the coaches. Moreover, it is a positive relationship between commitment and training and instruction (r=.25, p < 0.01) positive<br />

feedback (r= 22, p < 0.01) and social support behavior(r=.22 p < 0.01). Complementarity was positively related to training and instruction<br />

behavior (r=.17, p < 0.01). Multilevel logistic regression analyses indicated a significant difference between coaches in Denmark and<br />

Sweden on commitment (5.39 vs. 5.95) and complementarity (5.82 vs. 6.26) and coaches who are educated in <strong>sport</strong> use more positive<br />

feedback (4.25 vs. 4.41). Moreover, coaches with more than 10 years experiences in coaching us significantly more training and instruction<br />

(3.65 vs. 3.82) and social support (3.02 vs. 3.23) than coaches with less experiences. Furthermore, coaches in individual <strong>sport</strong> reported<br />

more democratic behavior (3.80 vs. 3.23) and less autocratic behavior (2.56 vs. 2.78) then coaches in team <strong>sport</strong>.<br />

OSLO/NORWAY, JUNE 24-27, 2009 31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!