23.12.2012 Views

european college of sport science

european college of sport science

european college of sport science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

14:15 - 15:15<br />

Poster presentations<br />

PP-TT09 Training and Testing 9<br />

DOES PLYOMETRIC TRAINING IMPROVE STRENGTH PERFORMANCE? A META-ANALYSIS<br />

SAEZ-SAEZ DE VILLARREAL, E., REQUENA, B.<br />

UNIVERSITY PABLO DE OLAVIDE (SEVILLA)<br />

PP-TT09 Training and Testing 9<br />

Plyometric training (PT) improves strength performance. However, the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> PT depends upon various factors. A meta-analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> 15 studies with a total <strong>of</strong> 24 effect sizes (ES) was carried out to analyze the role <strong>of</strong> various factors on the effects <strong>of</strong> PT on strength performance.<br />

The inclusion criteria for the analysis were: a) studies using PT programs for lower limb muscles b) studies employing true<br />

experimental design and valid and reliable measurements; c) studies including enough data to calculate ES. When subjects can adequately<br />

follow plyometric exercises, the training gains are independent <strong>of</strong> fitness level. Subjects in either good or bad physical condition,<br />

benefit equally from plyometric work, although men obtain similar strength results with women following PT. With relation to the variables<br />

<strong>of</strong> performance, training volume for less than 10 weeks and with more than 15 sessions, as well as the implementation <strong>of</strong> high intensities<br />

programs- with more than 40 jumps per session-, were the strategies that seem to maximize the probability to obtain significant greater<br />

improvements in performance (p< 0.05). In order to optimize strength enhancement, the combination <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> plyometrics<br />

with weight-training would be recommended, rather than utilizing only one form (p< 0.05). However, no extra benefits were found to be<br />

gained from doing plyometrics with added weight. The responses identified in this analysis are essential and should be considered by<br />

the strength and conditioning pr<strong>of</strong>essional with regard to the most appropriate dose-response trends PT to optimized strength gains.<br />

NEUROMUSCULAR AND METABOLIC FATIGUE WITH THE SAME ABSOLUTE AND RELATIVE INTENSITY AFTER STRENGTH<br />

TRAINING<br />

IZQUIERDO, M., IBAÑEZ, J., CALBET, J.A.L., GONZÁLEZ-IZAL, M., NAVARRO-AMEZQUETA, I., MALANDA, A., GONZÁLEZ-<br />

BADILLO, J.J., HÄKKINEN, K., KRAEMER, W.J., GOROSTIAGA, E.M.<br />

GOVERNMENT OF NAVARRA<br />

Introduction: Muscle hypertrophy (1,3), increases in maximal strength and power output (2-3) and enhanced agonist EMG activity (1,3) are<br />

typical adaptations during short-term heavy resistance training (i.e. 7-10 weeks). However, the effects <strong>of</strong> resistance training on dynamic<br />

exercise-induced fatigue with the same absolute and relative loading as in pretraining remain to be elucidated. This study examined the<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> heavy resistance training on dynamic exercise-induced fatigue task (5X10RM leg-press) after two loading protocols with the<br />

same relative intensity (%)(5x10RMRel) and the same absolute load (kg)(5x10RMAbs) as in pretraining in men(n=12).<br />

Methods: Maximal strength and muscle power, surface EMG changes [amplitude and spectral indices <strong>of</strong> muscle fatigue], and metabolic<br />

responses (i.e.blood lactate and ammonia concentrations) were measured before and after exercise.<br />

Results and Discusion<br />

The main findings <strong>of</strong> this study were that after short-term heavy resistance training, when the relative intensity <strong>of</strong> the fatiguing dynamic<br />

protocol was kept the same 1) the magnitude <strong>of</strong> exercise-induced loss in maximal strength was greater than that observed before training,<br />

2) the peak power lost after 5x10RMRel (58-62%, before and after training) was greater than the corresponding exercise-induced<br />

decline observed in maximal dynamic (23-34%) and isometric strength (12-17%), but this was followed by a more rapid and complete<br />

recovery, 3) the magnitude <strong>of</strong> the exercise-induced neuromuscular changes were similar than before training, as well 4) higher accumulation<br />

<strong>of</strong> blood lactate and ammonia concentration after training were observed. After a short-term strength training period, the main<br />

mechanisms responsible for the increased capacity to work with the same relative intensity are mainly <strong>of</strong> a peripheral nature, since<br />

similar neural adjustments but higher accumulated fatigue and metabolic demand (i.e. blood lactate and ammonia accumulation) were<br />

observed after multiple sets <strong>of</strong> dynamic fatiguing high-power contractions with the same relative load as in pretraining. This result may<br />

indicate that rate <strong>of</strong> fatigue development (i.e. power and MVC) was faster and more pr<strong>of</strong>ound after training despite using the same<br />

relative intensity. The fact that the same relative loading leads to increased rate <strong>of</strong> fatigue development after training has important<br />

practical implications. This may suggest that despite the enhanced ability to produce maximal strength and muscle power after a<br />

strength training program, it is important to note that when prescribing training programs a similar relative load as in pretraining could<br />

lead to a greater rate <strong>of</strong> fatigue development and, therefore, may induce different training effects.<br />

References<br />

1.Aagaard P, Simonsen EB, Andersen JL, et al. J Appl Physiol 2002; 93(4):1318-26.<br />

2.Häkkinen K, Alén M and Komi PV. Acta Physiol Scand 1985; 125(4):573-585.<br />

3.Izquierdo M, Ibañez J, González-Badillo JJ, et al. J Appl Physiol 2006; 100(5):1647-56.<br />

Supported by the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Education <strong>of</strong> Spain (Sport and Physical Activity DEP2006-56076)<br />

MAXIMAL DYNAMIC FORCE DEVELOPMENT IN THE SHOULDERS UNDER STABLE AND UNSTABLE CONDITIONS<br />

RUSTAD, O., SEILER, S.<br />

UNIVERSITY OF AGDER<br />

Purpose: The use <strong>of</strong> surface instability has gained popularity in strength training. However, the impact <strong>of</strong> unstable conditions during<br />

training on functional changes in force production is not well established and methods <strong>of</strong> isolating instability to specific joint complexes<br />

are lacking. In this study we have quantified the impact <strong>of</strong> surface instability on maximal force development <strong>of</strong> the shoulder complex<br />

during a weight bearing (closed kinetic chain) push-up task. In addition, the test-retest reliability <strong>of</strong> maximal dynamic force measurements<br />

was quantified under both conditions.<br />

Methods: 20 physically active university students (14 males, 6 females) performed 2 maximal dynamic force tests under stable and unstable<br />

conditions. Maximally explosive push-ups were performed on a force platform while holding push-up bars (Stable condition). This<br />

436 14 TH<br />

ANNUAL CONGRESS OF THE EUROPEAN COLLEGE OF SPORT SCIENCE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!