23.12.2012 Views

european college of sport science

european college of sport science

european college of sport science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10:15 - 11:45<br />

Oral presentations<br />

OP-HF01 Health and Fitness 1<br />

OP-HF01 Health and Fitness 1<br />

EFFECT OF AEROBIC DANCE ON BLOOD PRESSURE IN PREVIOUSLY INACTIVE PREGNANT WOMEN - A RANDOMIZED<br />

CONTROLLED TRIAL<br />

EDVARDSEN, E., HAAKSTAD, L.A., HALVORSEN, S., BØ, K.<br />

NORWEGIAN SCHOOL OF SPORT SCIENCES<br />

Introduction: In pregnant women, regular exercise has showed beneficial effects on numerous <strong>of</strong> health outcomes such as gestational<br />

diabetes and pregnant induced hypertension (1). Limited data are available on how regular training affects blood pressure (BP) in pregnant<br />

women in rest and during exercise. The aim <strong>of</strong> the present study was to evaluate the effect <strong>of</strong> a supervised exercise program on<br />

blood pressure at rest (BPrest) and during exercise (BPexercise) in previously inactive non-hypertensive pregnant women.<br />

Methods: 105 healthy sedentary primiparous pregnant women, mean gestational week 17 (SD ± 4,19), mean age 31 yrs (SD ± 4,05), mean<br />

BMI 25 (SD ± 4,18), were included in the study. After measurement <strong>of</strong> BPrest, the subject walked on a treadmill for measuring <strong>of</strong> BPexercise,<br />

heart rate and blood lactate concentration at different sub maximal workloads for establishment <strong>of</strong> anaerobic threshold (AT). They<br />

were then randomized to either an intervention or a control group. The intervention consisted <strong>of</strong> two to three aerobic dance sessions per<br />

week and minimum 30 minutes <strong>of</strong> daily self-exposed activity the rest <strong>of</strong> the days. All participants performed a post exercise test at mean<br />

gestation week 37 (SD ± 1,03). Mean differences in BT between exercise and control group were analysed by Independent Sample Student’s<br />

T-test in rest and during AT.<br />

Results: During the training period, drop-out rates were 34,6 % in the exercise group and 47,2 % in the control group. In addition, those<br />

subjects who participated in < 80 % <strong>of</strong> the aerobic dance sessions, or who did not reach AT during the pre-post exercise testing were<br />

excluded.<br />

BPrest before intervention was in the exercise (n= 52) and the control group (n=47) 115/66 mmHg (SD ± 11,73/7,30) and 115/67 mmHg (SD<br />

± 10,07/9,06) [mean sys/dia (SD)], respectively (sys: p=0,997, dia: p=0,349). BPrest after the intervention did not change significantly<br />

between the exercise (n= 19) and the control group (n=26);3,7/7,6 mmHg (SD ± 9,55/7,52) and 1,3/8,3 mmHg (SD ± 11,54/7,22), respectively.<br />

BPexercise at AT before intervention was in the exercise (n=13) and the control group (n=16) 149/61 mmHg (SD ± 14,54/7,26) and<br />

157/62 mmHg (SD ± 9,95/8,53), respectively, and did not change significantly after the intervention (sys: p=0,31, dia: p=0,68).<br />

Discussion: Regular exercise training in previously inactive non-hypertensive pregnant women seems to have no effect on blood pressure<br />

at rest and during exercise. Further, rise in blood pressure from rest to AT seems normal in both intervention- and control group in second<br />

as well as in third trimester.<br />

References<br />

1. Dye TD, Knox KL, Artal R, Aubry RH, Wojtowycz MA. Physical activity, obesity, and diabetes in pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol 1997;146:961-<br />

5.<br />

IS PELVIC FLOOR MUSLCE STRENGTH TRAINING EFFECTIVE WHEN TAUGHT IN A GENERAL FITNESS CLASS FOR PREG-<br />

NANT WOMEN? A SINGLE BLIND RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL<br />

BØ, K., HAAKSTAD, L.A.H.<br />

NORWEGIAN SCHOOL OF SPORT SCIENCES<br />

Introduction: A Cochrane review has shown that pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is effective in prevention and treatment <strong>of</strong> urinary and<br />

fecal incontinence in the peripartum period (1). The training programs used in the different randomized controlled trials followed vaginal<br />

palpation <strong>of</strong> ability to perform a correct contraction and were taught individually by trained physical therapists. The aim <strong>of</strong> the present<br />

study was to evaluate the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> PFMT given in a general fitness class for pregnant women instructed by lay instructors and with<br />

no vaginal palpation.<br />

Methods: One hundred and five primiparous women, mean age 30.7 years (SD 4.1) were randomized to either participation in two<br />

weekly one hour fitness classes including 35 minutes <strong>of</strong> low impact aerobic dance, 20 minutes <strong>of</strong> strength training with emphasize <strong>of</strong> the<br />

abdominals- back and pelvic floor muscles (3 sets <strong>of</strong> 8-12 close contractions) and 5 minutes <strong>of</strong> stretching/ relaxation. Outcome measure<br />

was number <strong>of</strong> women reporting urinary, flatus or anal incontinence based on questions from the Severity index and the International<br />

Consultation <strong>of</strong> Incontinence Questionnaire Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ UI-SF). Comparison <strong>of</strong> prevalence was done before the<br />

intervention (mean gestational week 17.7), after the intervention (mean gestational week 6.6) and postpartum (mean week 7.7). Chi-<br />

Square and Fischer Exact tests were used for analyses and p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.<br />

Results: There was no difference in number <strong>of</strong> women with any type <strong>of</strong> incontinence before the intervention. Drop-out rates were 21.1 %<br />

and 24.5% in the training and control groups, respectively. 27.5% followed all training sessions, with a mean adherence <strong>of</strong> 17.2 (SD 12.5,<br />

range 1-55) out <strong>of</strong> 24 possible training cessions. Twenty-one women (40.4%) attended &#8805; 80% <strong>of</strong> the training sessions. Number <strong>of</strong><br />

women reporting urinary, flatus or anal incontinence immediately after the intervention were 17/42, 11/42, 1/42 and 16/42, 9/42, 1/42 in<br />

the training and control groups, respectively. Postpartum the corresponding numbers were: 12/43, 10/43, 1/43 and 13/47, 8/47, 3/47,<br />

respectively. No significant differences were found between the training and control groups at any evaluation point.<br />

Discussion: There was no effect <strong>of</strong> a general fitness program including PFMT on reported urinary, flatus or fecal incontinence during<br />

pregnancy or after childbirth. The negative findings may be explained by an exceptional low adherence rate, instruction by lay instructors<br />

and no assessment <strong>of</strong> ability to conduct a correct PFM contraction. Future studies are recommended with larger sample size and use <strong>of</strong><br />

more adherence strategies.<br />

References:<br />

1. Hay-Smith J et al. Pelvic floor muscle training for prevention and treatment <strong>of</strong> urinary and faecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal<br />

women. Cochrane Database <strong>of</strong> Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD007471. doi:10.1002/ 14651858. CD007471.<br />

136 14 TH<br />

ANNUAL CONGRESS OF THE EUROPEAN COLLEGE OF SPORT SCIENCE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!