23.12.2012 Views

european college of sport science

european college of sport science

european college of sport science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PP-TT11 Training and Testing 11<br />

conclusion, the equation <strong>of</strong> this study can be used for the estimation <strong>of</strong> vVO2max, so as to use this variable for the prescription <strong>of</strong> interval<br />

endurance training.<br />

References<br />

1. Leger, LA et al. (1988), J Sports Sci, 93-101.<br />

2. Billat, V. (2001), Sports Med, 31 (1):13-31.<br />

3. Malek, M et al. (2004), Med. Sci. Sports. Exerc. 36(8): 1427- 1432.<br />

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MAXIMAL ISOMETRIC STRENGTH AND MUSCLE ENDURANCE<br />

NIEMI, J., VAARA, J., OHRANKÄMMEN, O.,3, SANTTILA, M., HÄKKINEN, K., FORSSTEN, A.S., KYRÖLÄINEN, H.,2<br />

1. NATIONAL DEFENCE UNIVERSITY, 2. UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ, FINLAND, 3. TRAINING DIVISION OF DEFENCE COMMAND<br />

Introduction: Good levels <strong>of</strong> both aerobic and neuromuscular fitness are <strong>of</strong> great importance in order to ensure sufficient physical performance<br />

<strong>of</strong> soldiers. Thus, it is essential to further develop field fitness tests which are valid to measure the true aerobic and neuromuscular<br />

performance. The purpose <strong>of</strong> the present study was to examine how well the present muscle fitness tests can evaluate maximal<br />

strength <strong>of</strong> different muscle groups. More specifically, our interest was to examine the relationships between bilateral isometric maximal<br />

strength <strong>of</strong> the arm and leg extensors and muscle endurance <strong>of</strong> the respective muscles.<br />

Methods: Bilateral isometric maximal strength <strong>of</strong> the arm and leg extensors, grip strength, muscle endurance (recording <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong><br />

repetitions in one-minute push-up, sit-up and squat actions) and VO2max were measured from a total <strong>of</strong> 783 reservists. Their mean age<br />

was 24 ± 2.8 yrs., height 1.80 ± 0.06 m, body mass 80.3 ± 13.5 kg, and percentage <strong>of</strong> body fat 17.8 ± 7.2 %. Muscle fitness index (MFI)<br />

was calculated from the results <strong>of</strong> muscle endurance tests. Overall physical fitness index (PFI) was further calculated from MFI and<br />

VO2max.<br />

Results: Mean (±SD) bilateral isometric strength was 2917 ± 868 N for the leg extensors and 898 ± 201 N for the arm extensors, and that<br />

<strong>of</strong> grip strength 53 ± 9 kg. The number <strong>of</strong> reps/min was 38 ± 10 in sit-ups, 28 ± 12 in push-ups and 43 ± 8 in squats. Mean VO2max was<br />

41.6 ± 8.1 ml&#61655;kg-1&#61655;min-1. Significant correlations were found between maximal strength <strong>of</strong> the arm extensors and repeated<br />

push-ups (r = 0.58, p < 0.001) as well as between repeated squats and VO2max (r = 0.55, p < 0.001). Bilateral isometric maximal<br />

force <strong>of</strong> the arm extensors correlated significantly with MFI and PFI (r = 0.51, p < 0.001; and r = 0.47, p = 0.001, respectively). No significant<br />

relationships were observed between maximal isometric strength <strong>of</strong> the arm or leg extensors and that <strong>of</strong> VO2max as well as between<br />

grip strength and MFI or PFI.<br />

Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that in a large group <strong>of</strong> subjects with great interindividual variation in physical fitness, the<br />

present muscle endurance tests seem to measure not only the level <strong>of</strong> muscle fitness, but also to some extent that <strong>of</strong> maximal strength.<br />

The relationship between maximal strength and muscle fitness was found in push-ups but not in repeated squats. However, the performance<br />

in repeated squats was related with VO2max, whereas that <strong>of</strong> push ups did not. Thus, it seems that muscle fitness measured<br />

by push-ups also relies on maximal strength, while the level <strong>of</strong> aerobic capacity contributes to performance in repeated squats. This may<br />

be explained by a higher relative load (body weight) <strong>of</strong> maximal strength in push-ups than in repeated squats. In conclusion, the present<br />

muscle fitness tests seem to measure rather well the overall fitness pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> soldiers, and the contributive role <strong>of</strong> maximal strength could<br />

be indentified for the arm but not for leg extensor muscles.<br />

THE VALIDITY OF POLAR FITNESS TEST IS ASIAN POPULATION<br />

LAUKKANEN, R., KANG, S.<br />

UNIVERSITY OF OULU, SANG MYUNG UNIVERSITY<br />

THE VALIDITY OF POLAR FITNESS TEST IN ASIAN POPULATION<br />

Raija Laukkanen*,** & Suhjung Kang***<br />

*Polar Electro Oy, Finland, ** University <strong>of</strong> Oulu, Finland, ***Sang Myung University, Seoul, Korea<br />

Introduction: Polar Fitness Test (PFT) is a simple method to predict cardiorespiratory fitness. PFT predicts maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max)<br />

based on age, gender, height, weight, resting heart rate and heart rate variability measurements and amount <strong>of</strong> physical activity. The test<br />

has been developed and validated in Caucasian population (Väinämö 1996, Kinnunen 2000). The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to examine<br />

the validity <strong>of</strong> PFT in predicting the VO2max in Asian (Korea) population.<br />

Methods: Sixty volunteer 20~49 years old female (n=30) and male (n=30) subjects participated in this study. All subjects were healthy and<br />

they did not use any medication. The mean(SD) <strong>of</strong> weight and height for the groups were: male 72.8 (8.4) kg, female 58.6 (9.4) kg and<br />

male 174.7 (5.9) cm, female 162.6 (5.6) cm.<br />

Prior to maximal stress test, PFT was tested using Polar FT60 training computer (Polar Electro Oy, Finland). Activity level was classified<br />

according frequency and intensity <strong>of</strong> weekly exercise during past 3 months. The subjects resting HR and R-R intervals were recorded<br />

during quiet lying on the bed for 5 minutes.<br />

Maximal stress test was performed using Bruce protocol. At each stage during the stress test, expired gases were collected and analyzed<br />

continuously (Trueone2400, USA). Criteria for attaining VO2max were as follows: heart rate at least 85% <strong>of</strong> the age-specific maximum<br />

(220-age), respiratory quotient (RQ) over 1.1, and voluntarily maximum (RPE higher than 17).To exam the mean differences <strong>of</strong> PFT and<br />

VO2max from laboratory test in each group, paired t-test was used. Also, the data was analyzed using the principle presented by Bland<br />

& Altman, and the total error <strong>of</strong> the prediction (E) was calculated.<br />

Results: The mean(SD) values and E <strong>of</strong> PFT and VO2max by the laboratory test in ml/kg/min are as follows. Male: PFT 43.3 (7.8),<br />

VO2maxlab 43.5 (7.0), (E 12.3), Female: PFT 34.3 (4.4), VO2maxlab 35.7 (6.7), (E 10.4). The mean differences by two methods in male (t=-<br />

.182, Sig=.857) and female (t=-1.258, Sig=.218) were not significantly different.<br />

Discussion: Measurements during exercise are the most common methods used to predict cardiorespiratory fitness. However, the current<br />

results showed that measurement from resting can be used to predict cardiorespiratory fitness. Our results show that PFT is a valid<br />

test to predict cardiorespiratory fitness in Koreans. However, in some individuals PFT may under-or overestimate the laboratory VO2max.<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> this study should be confirmed in other Asian populations and in individuals with various ages and activity status.<br />

References<br />

Kinnunen et al (2000). Med Sci Sports Exerc 32(5), 1535.<br />

Väinämö et al. (1996).Proceeding <strong>of</strong> ICNN, Washington DC, June 3-6, 1939-1949.<br />

610 14 TH<br />

ANNUAL CONGRESS OF THE EUROPEAN COLLEGE OF SPORT SCIENCE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!