23.12.2012 Views

european college of sport science

european college of sport science

european college of sport science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

OP-HF05 Health and Fitness 5<br />

pocket-in activity monitor. METHODS: Twenty Japanese adults equipped a shirt pocket-in activity monitor (AM-101, D30×W 80×H17, 19<br />

grams; TANITA Co. Ltd) while in a whole body indirect calorimetry for 24 hours (6 PM to 6 PM the next day). The triaxial accelerometers<br />

measure acceleration in three dimentional directions. It samples acceleration at 16 Hz and assesses values from – 2 to 2 G (1 G is equal<br />

to the acceleration <strong>of</strong> free fall). The acceleration count was calculated as the average <strong>of</strong> the absolute values for acceleration for a given<br />

interval (1 minute). The protocol time was composed <strong>of</strong> sleep (8 hours) and various structured activity periods. Acceleration data from<br />

various activities and their relationship to energy expenditure obtained from the whole body indirect calorimetry allowed for the development<br />

<strong>of</strong> EE equations for daily physical activities. The developed EE equation was cross-validated on 9 Japanese adults. RESULTS: The<br />

acceleration data <strong>of</strong> various activities was strongly correlated with the actual EE measured by the whole body indirect calorimetry. The<br />

predicted physical activity EE (PAEE) was highly correlated with the actual PAEE measured by the indirect calorimetry, although the predicted<br />

PAEE was slightly higher than the measured PAEE. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we found that the total acceleration obtained from<br />

the shirt pocket-in activity monitor was strongly and linearly correlated with the EE measured by the indirect calorimetery. The attachment<br />

<strong>of</strong> a triaxial accelerometer in a shirt-pocket is an ideal method to pick up the upper body movement in daily physical activity.<br />

HEALTH-RELATED PHYSICAL FITNESS AMONG ADULTS AND ELDERLY POPULATION. PILOT DATA FROM THE KAN<br />

PROJECT PHASE II.<br />

LOHNE-SEILER, H., HANSEN, B.H.<br />

UNIVERSITY OF AGDER, NORWEGIAN SCHOOL OF SPORT SCIENCES<br />

Introduction: On instructions <strong>of</strong> the Public Health Department, the work with KAN (Kartlegging Aktivitet Norge) is part <strong>of</strong> the follow-up <strong>of</strong> the<br />

national plan “Working together for physical activity”, and the goal is to make a system to monitor the level <strong>of</strong> physical activity (phase I)<br />

and health-related physical fitness (phase II) among the adults and the elderly population in Norway. The project is financed by the Norwegian<br />

Directorate <strong>of</strong> Health. The Norwegian School <strong>of</strong> Sport Sciences is in charge <strong>of</strong> the project in cooperation with 9 educational institutions<br />

at university and <strong>college</strong> level. Phase 2 will measure health-related physical fitness in an objective way. Therefore, the purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

this pilot study was to accomplish a pilot study based on standardized test battery for registering health-related fitness in the age group<br />

30-85 years.<br />

Methods: A total <strong>of</strong> 31 men (n=16) and women (n=15), initially 56.3±14.2 years participated in the pilot study. The test battery is partly<br />

based on the ALPHA group recommendation by Suni et al. (2008), measuring muscle strength and motor fitness. Tests measuring flexibility<br />

were also chosen because <strong>of</strong> the connection between mobility and the ability to cope with activities <strong>of</strong> daily living according Rikli and<br />

Jones (1999).<br />

Results: The participants (n=31) used 114.6 sec (SD 68.3) in the Static back extension test. In the Handgrip test (n=31) the score was 44.7 kg<br />

(SD 14.1). The results in the One leg standing test (n=31) was 33.0 sec (SD 20.6) and in the Modified push-up test the participants (n=24)<br />

accomplished 15.0 push-ups (SD 5.7) in 40 sec. Seven participants carried through the test on their knees and managed to do 9.6 pushups<br />

(SD 3.8) in 40 sec. The results from the Chair Sit-and-Reach and Back Stretch tests 6.7 cm (n=30, SD 14.2), left arm over 0.6 cm (n=30,<br />

SD 13.3) and right arm over -4.1 (n=30, SD 10.4) respectively.<br />

Discussion: Based on the high standard deviation shown on some <strong>of</strong> the tests and our subjective test experience, it is necessary to standardize<br />

all the tests in a way it makes it possible to implement the KAN test battery to all the 10 involved educational institutions.<br />

References<br />

Rikli R.E. and Jones C.J. (1999) Development and validation <strong>of</strong> a Functional Fitness Test for Community-residing older adults. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Aging and Physical Activity. 7:129-161.<br />

Suni J., Ruiz J.R., Castillo M.J., Husu P., Sjöström. (2008) Instruments for Assessing Levels <strong>of</strong> Physical Activity and Fitness (ALPHA project),<br />

Work package 6: Assessing Health-Related Fitness. Vrije University, Amsterdam 12. april.<br />

CONCURRENT VALIDITY OF SIMPLE BODY FAT COMPOSITION ASSESSMENT METHODS IN RECREATIONAL ATHLETES<br />

TRAN, H., THIEL, C., VOGT, L., ROSENHAGEN, A., BANZER, W.<br />

INSTITUTE OF SPORTS SCIENCES<br />

Introduction: A variety <strong>of</strong> methods can be used to determine percent body fat (% BF) as a cardiovascular risk factor and to classify recreational<br />

athletes <strong>of</strong> under-, normal- or overweight. However, various assessment methods may yield different results. Therefore the present<br />

study compared the most commonly used inexpensive, operationally simple, non-invasive techniques: bioelectrical impedance analysis<br />

(BIA), near infrared body composition analyzer (NIR) and hand-held caliper (Cal) measurements.<br />

Methods: The sample <strong>of</strong> 120 young recreational athletes (80 male (M), 40 female (F), 23.9±2.8 yrs, 1.76±0.08 m, 73.63±10.16 kg and BMI<br />

23.58±2.21 kg/m2) with a history <strong>of</strong> at least 3 years active participation in organized <strong>sport</strong> (>2 times activity/week) was measured by<br />

experienced examiners. For assessment, 3-point skinfold thickness (Lange skinfold caliper, Beta Technology, Santa Cruz, USA), near<br />

infrared body composition analyzer (Futrex, Futrex S<strong>of</strong>tware Services Europe, Bitburg, Germany) in a standardized sitting position and two<br />

different bioelectrical impedance analysis, standing (BIA-st) (Omron BF-500, Omron Healthcare, Mannheim, Germany) and prone lying<br />

(BIA-ly) (Nutriguard-S, Data-Input, Darmstadt, Germany) were performed in a randomized order. Percentage body fat calculations were<br />

used for device comparison and classification into the body fat categories (% BF) normal (10-19.9% (M), 20-29.9% (F)), underweight (35% (F)).<br />

Results: The subjects show different percentage BF (mean±SD) in accordance to the four measurement methods used: BIA-ly 18.5±6.2%,<br />

BIA-st 20.3±7.0%, NIR 17.5±6.0% and Cal 12.0±6.6%. Due to BIA-ly/ BIA-st and NIR measurements the study population is classified into<br />

the categories underweight (7-15%), normal (71-77%), overweight (7-20%) and obese (0-7%). In contrast caliper measures lead to a<br />

somewhat different frequency distribution: underweight (70%), normal (27%), overweight (2%) and obese (1%).<br />

Discussion: Many commonly used body fat assessment methods can be used at reasonable costs within minimal time (< 5 minutes) and<br />

require only limited investigator experience. However, the current results illustrate varying body composition classification according to<br />

the assessment method used in recreational athletes. The magnitude <strong>of</strong> difference seems to be linked to the underlying measuring<br />

mechanism. Whereas BIA and NIR measures revealed almost comparable results, great differences were observed in relation to the<br />

caliper method.<br />

506 14 TH<br />

ANNUAL CONGRESS OF THE EUROPEAN COLLEGE OF SPORT SCIENCE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!