23.12.2012 Views

european college of sport science

european college of sport science

european college of sport science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Saturday, June 27 th , 2009<br />

08:30 - 10:00<br />

Oral presentations<br />

OP-ST06 Sports 6<br />

OP-ST06 Sports 6<br />

THE EXTERNAL FORCES ACTING IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL AND THEIR RELATION TO MECHANICAL ENERGY DISSI-<br />

PATION IN SLALOM.<br />

GILGIEN, M., REID, R., HAUGEN, P., SMITH, G.<br />

NORWEGIAN SCHOOL FOR SPORT SCIENCES<br />

Introduction:<br />

The literature quantifying the external forces acting on an alpine skier is limited in general, but particularly in the slalom discipline. This<br />

study therefore describes the size and time course <strong>of</strong> the external forces acting on a skier parallel to the direction <strong>of</strong> travel based on the<br />

kinematics <strong>of</strong> a group <strong>of</strong> highly skilled slalom racers. Subsequently, the braking forces <strong>of</strong> ski-snow friction and wind drag are related to<br />

mechanical energy dissipation.<br />

Method:<br />

The derivation <strong>of</strong> the external forces was based on the kinematics <strong>of</strong> 6 members <strong>of</strong> the Norwegian Europa Cup team (aged 17-20). Skier<br />

kinematics were captured during 2 turns <strong>of</strong> a slalom race simulation by 4 panning and synchronized camcorders [1]. The centre <strong>of</strong> mass<br />

(COM) position calculation was based on the Zatsiorsky body segment parameter model and the de Leva adjustments. The component<br />

<strong>of</strong> gravity accelerating the skier downhill and the resultant force were both calculated from the COM position data. To calculate the air<br />

drag force, frontal area was estimated using a kinematics-based procedure, drag coefficients were adapted from a study <strong>of</strong> cross country<br />

skiers [2], and COM velocity was calculated using finite central differences. The remaining frictional force in the ski snow interaction<br />

was calculated as the difference between the resultant force, the air drag force and the component <strong>of</strong> gravity accelerating the skier<br />

downhill.<br />

Skier mechanical energy dissipation, defined as the amount <strong>of</strong> total mechanical energy dissipated to the surroundings per meter altitude<br />

skied [3], was derived from the COM position data. The braking forces were then correlated to mechanical energy dissipation.<br />

Results:<br />

The air drag force acting in slalom is rather small and constant (25 - 50N), while the frictional force between ski and snow alters rapidly<br />

during a turn cycle with peak values as high as 500N occurring at about gate passage.<br />

Energy dissipation showed a strong inverse statistical correlation with the frictional force in the ski-snow interaction (R2 = -0.96, p < 0.001),<br />

while the relation between energy dissipation and the air drag force was not significant.<br />

[1] Nachbauer, W., et al. (1996). J Appl Biomechanics, 12, 104-115<br />

[2] Spring, E., et al. (1988). Int. J. Sport Biomechanics, 4<br />

[3] Supej, M. (2008). J. Appl Biomechanics, 24, 121–129<br />

PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE OF ELDERLY ALPINE SKIERS DEPENDS ON INDIVIDUAL MOVEMENT PATTERN.<br />

SCHEIBER, P., SEIFERT, J., MÜLLER, E.<br />

UNIVERSITY OF SALZBURG, DEPARTMENT OF SPORT SCIENCE & KINESIOLOGY<br />

Introduction: It has been demonstrated that there are skiers who have a low physiological response when skiing, while other skiers have<br />

greater physiological responses at similar skiing velocities (Scheiber et al. 2009). Interestingly, the aerobic capacity <strong>of</strong> these skiers seemed<br />

to have little effect on the physiological responses <strong>of</strong> these technically homogenous skiers while skiing. It has also been reported that<br />

blood lactate is a valid predictor for cumulative physiological stress in alpine skiing (Seifert et al. 2008). It can be speculated that the interindividual<br />

variation in kinematical variables <strong>of</strong> subjects skiing technique may also influence physiological response. Thus, the purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

this study was to quantify the influence <strong>of</strong> kinematic variables on the physiological response in recreational alpine skiing.<br />

Method: Nineteen older alpine skiers (61.1±5.7 years) performed two different ski-instructor paced (LP and HP) and one self paced (SP)<br />

skiing mode on a medium pitch, well prepared slope. Blood lactate (LA), HR, blood pressure (BP), and knee angle were determined.<br />

Mean knee angle (MKA), as well as the range <strong>of</strong> knee angle (RKA) <strong>of</strong> twenty double turns were calculated for each run. Pearson correlations<br />

were obtained between kinematical and physiological variables. Independent t-tests were performed to calculate mean group<br />

differences in kinematic and physiological variables <strong>of</strong> low (LO) vs. high lactate (HI) skiers.<br />

Results: The most interesting physiological findings were found for LA. Mean LA <strong>of</strong> the whole group was 1.40±0.34 mmol.L-1 for LP runs,<br />

1.94±0.59 mmol.L-1 for HP runs, and 2.34±0.87 mmol.L-1 for SP runs. MKA <strong>of</strong> LP runs was 123.8±6.1°, for HP runs 117.5±6.0° and for SP<br />

runs 117.1±6.0°. The RKA <strong>of</strong> LP runs was 19.0±3.9°, for HP runs 20.3±3.7° and for SP runs 17.7±3.6°. A significant correlation was found<br />

only for RKA and LA during SP runs, (r²=.465; p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!