23.12.2012 Views

european college of sport science

european college of sport science

european college of sport science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PP-CO03 Coaching 3<br />

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE ROTATIONAL THROW AND THE GLIDE THROW TECHNIQUES ON SHOT PUT EVENT<br />

AOYAMA, S., FUKUDA, S., AOYAMA, T., TSUNODA, N.<br />

UNIVIRSITY OF KOKUSHIKAN<br />

Introduction: In recently, many shot put throwers performing the rotational throw technique is increasing in shot put event. What are some<br />

<strong>of</strong> the advantage and disadvantage <strong>of</strong> the rotational throw and the glide throw techniques. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to clarify the<br />

difference <strong>of</strong> technical factors between the rotational throw and the glide throw techniques for design <strong>of</strong> skill training program.<br />

Methods: Subjects were seven male Japanese right-handed elite shot put throwers who can use the rotational throw and the glide throw<br />

techniques (age:22.7±2.3yrs, height:176.6±6.8cm, body weight:107.6±15.1kg, rotational throw:14.1±1.3m, glide throw:13.4±1.5m). All the<br />

subjects performed total six throws that three rotational throw technique and three glide throw technique same as a competition rules.<br />

Rotational throw technique and glide throw technique were measured by 3-D analysis (APAS) that was analyzed for release speed,<br />

release angle, release high, shot acceleration (horizontal, vertical and total acceleration) and shot movement speed. Throwing movement<br />

was divided by turn-phase and push-phase during shot put movement.<br />

Results: Shot put performance was significantly related to the release speed in both throw techniques (rotational throw: r=0.501, glide<br />

throw: r=0.579). Shot acceleration <strong>of</strong> vertically and total acceleration in rotational throw technique were significantly higher than glide<br />

throw technique during the push-phase. Similarly, shot moved speed in the rotational throw technique was significantly higher than the<br />

glide throw technique during the on turn-phase.<br />

Discussion: From these results, it was cleared that developing <strong>of</strong> the release speed is most important factor in shot put for both throwing<br />

techniques. The rotational throw technique to the pushing vertical direction may important factor during the push-phase. And also, the<br />

rotational throw technique may energy stored on lower limb and trunk during the turn-phase in the rotational throw skill training.<br />

References<br />

Luhtanen P, Blonqvist M, Vanttinen T. (1997) New studies in athletics 12 (4), 25-33<br />

Redding J.A. (1988) Track and field quarterly review 3 15-18<br />

KINEMATIC ANALYSIS OF THREE DIFFERENT SPRINT START POSITION IN NOVICE ATHLETES<br />

MILANESE, C.<br />

FACULTY OF MOTOR SCIENCES<br />

KINEMATIC ANALYSIS OF THREE DIFFERENT SPRINT START POSITIONS IN NOVICE ATHLETES<br />

Milanese Chiara*,**, Bertucco Matteo*,***, Ferrari Giorgia*, Zancanaro Carlo*,**<br />

*Faculty <strong>of</strong> Motor Sciences, **Department <strong>of</strong> Morphological and Biomedical Sciences, ***Department <strong>of</strong> Neurological and Visual Sciences,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Verona, Italy<br />

Introduction: The kinematic patterns <strong>of</strong> elite athletes performing the sprint start in the track received considerable attention (1-5) in attempt<br />

to provide coaches and athletes an invariant biomechanical model for training; however, little information regarding novice athletes is<br />

available. Novice athletes tend to stand up too soon when leaving the blocks, thereby gaining little benefit, if any, from the original block<br />

position. This study was aimed at examining whether changing the angle at the knee joint in the rear leg in the set position, influence<br />

step length and velocity <strong>of</strong> the centre <strong>of</strong> mass (COM) in the first two steps. Results would help defining the best start position <strong>of</strong> novice<br />

sprinters.<br />

Methods: Eleven novice sprinters (6 males and 5 females, age 23,5 ± 2,12 yrs, height 1,72 ± 0,05 m, weight 60,9 ± 5,52 kg) took part in<br />

this study. Participants were asked to perform the sprint start at three different knee angles <strong>of</strong> the rear leg (90°, 115°, 135°). The block was<br />

placed at a medium block spacing according to Schot & Knutzen (1992). Each subject performed 10 trials at each knee angle. Kinematic<br />

analyses were performed with a VICON (8 cameras, 250Hz) system and s<strong>of</strong>tware to yield the traveled distance and the COM velocity in<br />

the two first steps in the horizontal direction.<br />

Results: The results indicate that horizontal velocity <strong>of</strong> COM at the first step is greater at 90° (p=0,019 and p=0,05 vs 115° and 135°, respectively);<br />

at the second step, the COM velocity was greater at 90° than 115° or 135°; however, a significant difference was only present<br />

at 115° vs 135° (p=0,020). No significant difference was found in the length <strong>of</strong> the first two steps, although the greatest value was at 90°.<br />

Discussion: These preliminary results indicated that novice sprinters produce greater velocity and step length with a rear leg knee angle<br />

between 90° and 115°. It can be hypothesized that, in novice athletes and in the given block setting, lower angles allow to develop larger<br />

force in the muscle groups involved in sprint start. Analysis <strong>of</strong> EMG data is presently being undertaken to validate such hypothesis. Further,<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> the thrust angle will show whether lower angles at the knee make the novices’ performance closer to that <strong>of</strong> experienced<br />

sprinters. This would help coaches in choosing the more effective angle at the knee <strong>of</strong> the rear leg, which is currently suggested in the<br />

134° -145° range.<br />

References<br />

1. Mero et al. (1983). Scand J Sport Sci, 5(1) 20-26<br />

2. Schot & Knutzen (1992). Res Q Exerc Sport, 63(2), 137-147<br />

3. Harland & Steele (1997). Sports Med, 23(1), 11-20<br />

4. Coh et al. (1998). Gymnica, 28, 33-42<br />

5. Coh & Tomazin (2006). New Studies in Athletics, 21(3), 23-33.<br />

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN VISUAL ACUITY AND GAME PERFORMANCE IN WATER POLO<br />

KOMORI, Y., MOCHIZUKI, K., ENOMOTO, I., MAEDA, A., KONO, I.<br />

DOSHISHA UNIVERSITY<br />

Introduction: Recently the number <strong>of</strong> people who are shortsighted have increased in Japan. Likewise the number <strong>of</strong> reports on the importance<br />

<strong>of</strong> correcting visual acuity from the standpoint <strong>of</strong> game performance and safety in <strong>sport</strong>s have also increased. Players <strong>of</strong> water polo<br />

are unable to correct their visual acuity since players are prohibited from using glasses or swimming goggles during play. Thus low<br />

visual acuity players use contact lenses in the water. Disposable type lenses are becoming popular with those players who use contact<br />

lenses. However, players without corrected visual acuity are also playing the game even though their uncorrected visual acuity is below<br />

0.1 (Komori, 1998.) It is known that a decline <strong>of</strong> vision affects game performance in baseball and table tennis. However, the relationship<br />

566 14 TH<br />

ANNUAL CONGRESS OF THE EUROPEAN COLLEGE OF SPORT SCIENCE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!